Standards Comparison

    ISO 45001

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for occupational health and safety management

    VS

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law for risk-based information security management

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 45001 provides voluntary global OH&S management for all industries, emphasizing worker safety and continual improvement. FISMA mandates US federal cybersecurity via NIST RMF for agencies/contractors. Companies adopt ISO 45001 for safety certification; FISMA for legal compliance and contracts.

    Occupational Health & Safety

    ISO 45001

    ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates leadership accountability and worker participation
    • Requires hierarchy of controls for risks
    • Annex SL structure enables IMS integration
    • Risk-based planning addresses opportunities too
    • Explicit change and contractor management controls
    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management lifecycle
    • Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics program
    • Enforces FIPS 199 system impact categorization
    • Implements NIST SP 800-53 tailored controls
    • Demands annual IG independent maturity evaluations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 45001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 45001:2018 is an international certification standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSMS). It provides a framework to prevent work-related injuries and ill health, improve OH&S performance, using a risk-based approach aligned with Annex SL and PDCA cycle across Clauses 4-10.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses: Context (4), Leadership/participation (5), Planning (6), Support (7), Operation (8), Evaluation (9), Improvement (10).
    • Emphasizes hierarchy of controls, worker consultation, change management.
    • Built on high-level structure for integration; no fixed controls, scalable requirements.
    • Optional third-party certification via audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces incidents, legal risks, costs; enhances resilience, insurance savings.
    • Meets stakeholder expectations, supply-chain demands.
    • Builds safety culture, competitive edge via certification.
    • Drives continual improvement, reputation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, controls, audits (6-12 months typical).
    • Applicable all sizes/sectors; integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
    • Involves training, documented info, management reviews.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    The Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law modernizing the 2002 E-Government Act provision. It mandates a risk-based framework for federal agencies and contractors to develop, document, and maintain comprehensive information security programs protecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability of federal systems and data.

    Key Components

    • **NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)7 repeatable steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor).
    • NIST SP 800-53 controls (over 1,000, tailored via SP 800-53B baselines) and FIPS 199 categorization (Low/Moderate/High impact).
    • Continuous monitoring (SP 800-137), POA&Ms, SSPs; oversight by OMB, CISA/DHS, agency IGs.
    • No central certification; compliance via annual metrics and independent evaluations.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for federal executive agencies, contractors handling federal data.
    • Reduces breach risks, ensures resilience, enables FedRAMP cloud access.
    • Avoids IG downgrades, contract losses, debarment; builds stakeholder trust.
    • Strategic efficiency, competitive differentiation in federal markets.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased RMF lifecycle with governance, inventory, controls, assessments.
    • Key activities: risk assessments, SSP development, automation, training.
    • Applies to federal agencies/contractors all sizes; U.S.-focused.
    • Requires IG audits, continuous reporting; 12-24 months typical rollout.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 45001
    Occupational health & safety management
    FISMA
    Federal information & cybersecurity protection

    Industry

    ISO 45001
    All sectors worldwide, scalable
    FISMA
    US federal agencies & contractors

    Nature

    ISO 45001
    Voluntary international certification standard
    FISMA
    Mandatory US federal law & regulation

    Testing

    ISO 45001
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification
    FISMA
    Continuous monitoring, IG assessments, ATOs

    Penalties

    ISO 45001
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    FISMA
    Contract loss, fines, debarment, legal action

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 45001 and FISMA

    ISO 45001 FAQ

    FISMA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages