ISO 55001
International standard for asset management systems
23 NYCRR 500
New York regulation for financial services cybersecurity
Quick Verdict
ISO 55001 provides voluntary asset management certification for global infrastructure firms, optimizing lifecycle value. 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity compliance for NY financial entities, enforcing governance and rapid incident reporting to protect NPI.
ISO 55001
ISO 55001:2024 Asset management — Management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- Requires Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) linking strategy to operations
- Follows Annex SL structure for integration with other management systems
- Applies PDCA cycle across Clauses 4-10 for continual improvement
- Mandates formal asset management decision-making framework (2024 update)
- Separates risks and opportunities in planning with climate change consideration
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- CISO/CEO annual dual-signature compliance certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
- Risk-based third-party service provider oversight policy
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 55001 Details
What It Is
ISO 55001:2024 is the international certification standard specifying requirements for an Asset Management System (AMS). It enables organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and improve processes realizing value from assets across lifecycles. Applicable to asset-intensive sectors, it uses a risk-based, PDCA-aligned approach via Annex SL structure.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance Evaluation, Improvement.
- 72 'shall' requirements focusing on SAMP, decision framework, risks/opportunities.
- Built on ISO 55000 terminology and Annex SL for integration.
- Third-party certification via audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Optimizes asset performance, costs, risks amid regulations and stakeholder expectations.
- Voluntary but drives compliance, resilience, financial discipline.
- Enhances governance, breaks silos, builds trust (e.g., utilities, infrastructure).
- Provides competitive edge through certification.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, SAMP development, competence building, operational controls.
- Suits mid-to-large organizations in utilities, transport, manufacturing.
- Involves training, tools (EAM/CMMS), audits; 12-24 months typical.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation for financial services entities. It mandates a risk-based cybersecurity program to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems' confidentiality, integrity, and availability, applying to NY-licensed banks, insurers, and related firms.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements: cybersecurity program (§500.2), policy (§500.3), CISO (§500.4), MFA (§500.12), encryption (§500.15), TPSP oversight (§500.11), incident response (§500.16), 72-hour notification (§500.17).
- Pillars include governance, risk assessments, technical controls, testing, and annual CISO/CEO certification.
- Built on NIST CSF-like methodologies; no formal certification but DFS examinations and five-year record retention.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for Covered Entities to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, TPSP management, reduces incident risk.
- Builds board-level accountability, stakeholder trust, and competitive edge in financial services.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, asset inventory, MFA rollout, TPSP contracts over 0-24 months.
- Targets NY financial sector; Class A firms need enhanced audits/EDR.
- Focuses on evidence-based compliance via centralized repositories.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 55001 | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Asset management systems lifecycle governance | Cybersecurity for information systems and NPI |
| Industry | Asset-intensive sectors globally (utilities, infrastructure) | NY financial services (banks, insurers, licensees) |
| Nature | Voluntary ISO certification standard | Mandatory NY state regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, PDCA cycles | Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans, risk assessments |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Fines, consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 55001 and 23 NYCRR 500
ISO 55001 FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 14001 vs SQF
Discover ISO 14001 vs SQF: EMS for environmental excellence vs GFSI food safety certification. Key differences in structure, audits, lifecycle focus & benefits. Optimize compliance!
POPIA vs FSSC 22000
Discover POPIA vs FSSC 22000: SA's data privacy law meets global food safety certification. Uncover key differences, compliance tips & strategies for seamless integration. Achieve mastery now!
APPI vs HITRUST CSF
Compare APPI vs HITRUST CSF: Japan's privacy law vs certifiable security framework. Uncover key differences, compliance tips & implementation for global data handlers. Secure your edge now.