ISO 55001
International standard for asset management systems
CIS Controls
Prioritized cybersecurity controls framework for resilience
Quick Verdict
ISO 55001 establishes asset management systems for lifecycle value in infrastructure sectors, while CIS Controls deliver prioritized cybersecurity hygiene across all industries. Asset-heavy firms certify ISO 55001 for governance; all organizations adopt CIS for attack mitigation.
ISO 55001
ISO 55001:2024 Asset management — Management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- Requires Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) linking strategy to operations
- Formal asset management decision-making framework (new in 2024)
- Annex SL structure integrates with other ISO management systems
- PDCA cycle ensures continual improvement of AMS
- Balances asset performance, risks, and costs across lifecycle
CIS Controls
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalability
- Asset and software inventory foundations
- Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001
- Free Benchmarks and Navigator tools
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 55001 Details
What It Is
ISO 55001:2024 is the international certification standard specifying requirements for an Asset Management System (AMS). It applies a management systems approach to realize value from assets across lifecycles, using Annex SL high-level structure and PDCA cycle for structured, risk-based planning and continual improvement.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- 72 mandatory "shall" requirements.
- Core elements: Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP), decision-making framework, risk/opportunity actions.
- Certification via accredited third-party audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Optimizes asset performance, costs, risks in asset-intensive sectors.
- Meets regulatory, contractual demands; builds stakeholder trust.
- Enables integration with ISO 9001/14001; drives resilience, efficiency.
- Provides competitive edge through certified governance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, SAMP development, process integration, training.
- Suits all sizes/industries (utilities, infrastructure); 12-24 months typical.
- Involves EAM tools, competence building; optional certification with surveillance audits.
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It applies across industries and organization sizes, using Implementation Groups (IG1-IG3) for risk-based, scalable adoption.
Key Components
- 18 controls with 153 safeguards, from asset inventory to penetration testing.
- Focus on foundational hygiene (Controls 1-6), organizational defenses (7-16), and advanced capabilities (17-18).
- Built on real-world attack data; no certification, but self-assessable via tools like Controls Navigator.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates 85% of common attacks, cuts breach costs, accelerates compliance (NIST, HIPAA, PCI DSS).
- Builds trust with stakeholders, insurers, partners; enables efficiency and competitive edge.
- Voluntary but cited for "reasonable security" in regulations.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased roadmapGovernance, discovery, foundational (IG1), expansion (IG2/IG3), validation.
- Involves asset inventories, automation, metrics; suits SMBs to enterprises globally.
- No formal audits; uses KPIs, CIS Benchmarks for ongoing measurement. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 55001 | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Asset management systems, lifecycle value optimization | Cybersecurity best practices, attack mitigation |
| Industry | Asset-intensive sectors (utilities, infrastructure, manufacturing) | All industries, technology-agnostic |
| Nature | Voluntary certification management system standard | Voluntary prioritized cybersecurity framework |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits | Continuous monitoring, penetration testing, self-assessments |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No formal penalties, increased breach risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 55001 and CIS Controls
ISO 55001 FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
LGPD vs ISO 27018
Unlock LGPD vs ISO 27018: Brazil's GDPR-like law meets cloud PII privacy standard. Compare 10 principles, rights, fines & SCCs for seamless global compliance now!
NIS2 vs WCAG
Unpack NIS2 vs WCAG: Cybersecurity resilience vs web accessibility. Discover scopes, requirements, fines & conformance for EU entities. Boost compliant digital ops now!
Six Sigma vs GMP
Explore Six Sigma vs GMP: Data-driven DMAIC & belts reduce defects to 3.4 DPMO, while GMP ensures regulatory compliance via validation & QMS. Choose wisely for quality wins!