Standards Comparison

    ISO 56002

    Voluntary
    2019

    Guidance standard for innovation management systems

    VS

    CIS Controls

    Voluntary
    2021

    Prioritized cybersecurity framework reducing common attack surfaces

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 56002 provides guidance for building innovation management systems across organizations, while CIS Controls offer prioritized cybersecurity safeguards for threat defense. Companies adopt ISO 56002 for structured innovation governance and CIS Controls for practical cyber hygiene and resilience.

    Innovation Management

    ISO 56002

    ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA cycle aligned management system framework
    • High-Level Structure for seamless integration
    • Top management leadership and policy commitment
    • End-to-end innovation processes Clauses 4-10
    • Tool-agnostic adaptable guidance across sectors
    Cybersecurity

    CIS Controls

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
    • Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
    • Technology-agnostic, community-driven best practices
    • Mappings to NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001
    • Focus on asset inventory and vulnerability management

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 56002 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance is a generic framework providing guidance to establish, implement, maintain, and improve an Innovation Management System (IMS). Its primary purpose is to build organization-wide innovation capability for value realization across sectors and sizes. It uses a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with ISO High-Level Structure (HLS).

    Key Components

    • Seven core clauses (4-10): Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance evaluation, Improvement.
    • Eight principles including future-focused leadership, strategic direction, and uncertainty management.
    • No prescriptive requirements or tools; emphasizes adaptability.
    • Conformity via self-assessment or external audits, not formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances portfolio governance, reduces innovation theater, manages uncertainty, and integrates with systems like ISO 9001. Drives competitiveness, stakeholder trust, and sustained growth without legal mandates.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased roadmap: awareness, gap analysis, design, pilot, scale, sustain. Applicable to all organizations; tailored for SMEs via diagnostics. Involves leadership policy, KPIs, audits; optional external assurance.

    CIS Controls Details

    What It Is

    CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven cybersecurity framework providing prioritized, actionable safeguards to mitigate prevalent threats. Its control-based approach focuses on reducing attack surfaces through technology-agnostic best practices applicable to hybrid and cloud environments.

    Key Components

    • 18 Controls across asset management, access control, vulnerability management, logging, and incident response.
    • 153 Safeguards decomposed into measurable tasks.
    • Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3) scaling from basic hygiene (56 IG1 safeguards) to advanced practices.
    • No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment and audits using tools like CIS RAM.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Maps to NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001 for multi-framework efficiency.
    • Reduces breach likelihood and recovery time; supports insurance discounts and regulatory safe harbors.
    • Delivers operational efficiencies, market trust, and competitive differentiation across industries and sizes.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: governance, gap analysis, foundational controls (IG1 in 3–9 months), expansion to IG2/IG3.
    • Activities include asset inventories, automated scanning, training.
    • Suited for all sizes/industries; SMBs target IG1, enterprises IG3.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 56002
    Innovation management systems guidance
    CIS Controls
    Cybersecurity best practices and safeguards

    Industry

    ISO 56002
    All sectors, sizes, global applicability
    CIS Controls
    All industries, sizes, technology-agnostic

    Nature

    ISO 56002
    Voluntary guidance, non-certifiable
    CIS Controls
    Voluntary prioritized controls framework

    Testing

    ISO 56002
    Internal audits, management reviews
    CIS Controls
    Self-assessments, maturity evaluations

    Penalties

    ISO 56002
    No legal penalties
    CIS Controls
    No formal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 56002 and CIS Controls

    ISO 56002 FAQ

    CIS Controls FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages