What is the primary objective of **ISO 56002**?

**ISO 56002 provides guidance for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an **Innovation Management System (IMS)** to create value through innovation.** Published in 2019, it uses a **High-Level Structure (HLS)** with Clauses 4–10 aligned to the **PDCA cyclePlan (Clauses 4–6: context, leadership, planning), Do (Clauses 7–8: support, operation), Check (Clause 9: performance evaluation), Act (Clause 10: improvement). The IMS reframes innovation as a repeatable capability, managing uncertainty via portfolio governance, without prescribing tools.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 56002**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 56002, as it is voluntary guidance applicable to all established organizations regardless of size, sector, or innovation type.** It targets executives building sustained innovation capability, users seeking confidence in IMS maturity, and providers of training/assessment. Start-ups and temporary entities may adopt elements partially. Professional drivers include stakeholder demands for demonstrable governance in partnerships or procurement.

Does **ISO 56002** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 56002 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being explicit guidance rather than a requirements standard.** Organizations conduct internal audits (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3) for IMS effectiveness. Conformity assessments or assurance may be pursued voluntarily via accredited bodies, often preparing for ISO 56001 certification where applicable.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 56002** be performed?

**ISO 56002 requires regular performance evaluations, including internal audits and management reviews, with frequency determined by the organization based on IMS risks and objectives.** Clause 9 mandates defining criteria, KPIs, methods, and responsibilities; Clause 10 drives continual improvement. Practical cadences include annual audits and quarterly reviews to address nonconformities and portfolio health.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 56002**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 56002 carries no legal penalties, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Potential business consequences include resource waste on "zombie projects," stalled innovation portfolios, reduced competitiveness, and diminished stakeholder confidence. Without IMS governance, organizations risk poor value realization, unmanaged uncertainty, and integration gaps with other management systems.

Can **ISO 56002** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 56002 aligns structurally with other ISO management system standards via its shared High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle.** Clauses 4–10 enable integration of IMS with existing systems, sharing leadership reviews, audits, documented information, and improvement processes. This reduces duplication while embedding innovation into broader governance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 56002**?

**The first step to implement ISO 56002 is building awareness and conducting a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10.** Educate stakeholders on IMS benefits, assess current practices via tools like maturity diagnostics, and define context (Clause 4), securing top management commitment (Clause 5) for policy, roles, and resources.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 28000**?

**ISO 28000 specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a security management system (SMS) with explicit relevance to supply chain security.** It operationalizes a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle across Clauses 4–10, requiring organizations to assess security risks—including malicious acts, functional failures, and disruptions—while integrating top management leadership, risk treatment aligned with **ISO 31000**, and performance evaluation through audits and reviews. The standard is sector-agnostic, applicable to all organization sizes, emphasizing holistic governance over prescriptive controls.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 28000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 28000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** Professionally, it applies to any entity influencing supply chain security, including logistics providers, manufacturers, retailers, ports, and government agencies handling goods transport, storage, or related activities. Adoption is driven by customer contracts, insurer demands, trade facilitation programs, or risk reduction needs, with top management accountable for SMS integration into business processes per Clause 5.

Does **ISO 28000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 28000 does not require external audit or third-party certification; conformity may be verified through internal or external auditing.** Certification follows ISO 28003 guidelines via accredited bodies, typically involving Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (implementation audit), with annual surveillance. Organizations pursue it for assurance, market access, or partner requirements, but the standard mandates only internal audits at planned intervals (Clause 9.2) and management reviews (Clause 9.3).

How often should an assessment for **ISO 28000** be performed?

**Risk assessments under ISO 28000 must be maintained as an ongoing process per Clause 8.3, with frequency determined by organizational context, risk levels, and changes.** Internal audits occur at planned intervals via a risk-based program (Clause 9.2), considering process importance and prior results. Management reviews happen at planned intervals (Clause 9.3), typically annually, reviewing performance data, nonconformities, and context changes. Full reassessments align with PDCA continual improvement (Clause 10).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 28000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 28000 carries no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but results in unmitigated security risks like theft, sabotage, or disruptions.** Operationally, it leads to supply chain failures, financial losses, reputational damage, lost contracts, higher insurance premiums, and exclusion from security-demanding markets. Internally, Clause 10 requires addressing nonconformities via corrective actions, risk-reviewed to prevent recurrence, ensuring SMS effectiveness.

Can **ISO 28000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 28000:2022 aligns with ISO high-level structure (Annex SL), enabling mapping to frameworks like ISO 31000 for risk management and ISO 22301 for business continuity.** Its PDCA cycle and clauses (4–10) support integrated management systems, sharing elements like context analysis (Clause 4), leadership (Clause 5), and performance evaluation (Clause 9). Bibliography references facilitate consistency in audits, documentation, and security plans without requiring separate implementations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 28000**?

**The first step is determining the organization’s context, interested parties, and SMS scope per Clause 4.** This involves mapping internal/external issues, supply chain dependencies, legal requirements, and externally provided processes, documenting boundaries as evidenced information. It informs risk/opportunity planning (Clause 6), ensuring tailored applicability across all organization types and sizes.

ISO 56002 vs ISO 28000

Standards Comparison

ISO 56002

Voluntary

2019

International guidance standard for innovation management systems

ISO 28000

Voluntary

2022

International standard for supply chain security management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 56002 provides guidance for building innovation management systems to drive value creation across organizations, while ISO 28000 specifies requirements for supply chain security management systems to protect against risks and disruptions. Companies adopt them for systematic governance, resilience, and stakeholder credibility.

Innovation Management

ISO 56002

ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

PDCA cycle for IMS continual improvement
HLS alignment enables integration with ISO standards
Top management commitment and policy required
Risk-opportunity management for innovation uncertainty
Tool-agnostic guidance adaptable across sectors

Supply Chain Security

ISO 28000

ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based supply chain security assessment
PDCA cycle for continual improvement
Leadership commitment and policy requirements
Operational controls for suppliers and processes
Integration with ISO 31000 and 22301

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It provides a generic framework applicable to all organization types, focusing on value creation through innovation via a PDCA cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Eight principles including future-focused leadership, uncertainty management, and continual learning.
Non-prescriptive; no fixed controls, emphasizes adaptability.
Conformity via self-assessment or third-party audits; pairs with ISO 56001 for certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives strategic innovation governance and portfolio discipline.
Reduces "zombie projects" and resource waste.
Enhances competitiveness, stakeholder trust, and integration with standards like ISO 9001.
Manages uncertainty while enabling radical/incremental innovation.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: diagnosis, design, pilot, scale, sustain.
Involves policy creation, role definition, KPI setup, audits.
Suits all sizes/sectors; voluntary with staged adoption for SMEs.

ISO 28000 Details

What It Is

ISO 28000:2022 — Security management systems — Requirements — is an international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a security management system (SMS) with supply chain focus. It uses a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology aligned with ISO management systems.

Key Components

Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
Risk assessment/treatment per ISO 31000
Operational controls, security plans, supplier management
Certification via ISO 28003-accredited bodies

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates theft, sabotage, disruptions
Meets contractual/regulatory demands (e.g., C-TPAT equivalents)
Boosts resilience, insurance savings, market access
Builds stakeholder trust, competitive edge

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, policy design, rollout, audits
Scalable for all sizes/industries
Involves training, internal audits, management reviews

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 56002	ISO 28000
Scope	Innovation management systems, value creation through innovation	Supply chain security management, risk protection and resilience
Industry	All sectors, organizations, sizes; established focus	Logistics, manufacturing, supply chains; all sizes
Nature	Guidance standard, voluntary, non-certifiable directly	Requirements standard, voluntary certification possible
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews, conformity assessment	Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits
Penalties	No legal penalties, loss of conformity or credibility	No legal penalties, loss of certification or contracts

Scope

ISO 56002

Innovation management systems, value creation through innovation

ISO 28000

Supply chain security management, risk protection and resilience

Industry

ISO 56002

All sectors, organizations, sizes; established focus

ISO 28000

Logistics, manufacturing, supply chains; all sizes

Nature

ISO 56002

Guidance standard, voluntary, non-certifiable directly

ISO 28000

Requirements standard, voluntary certification possible

Testing

ISO 56002

Internal audits, management reviews, conformity assessment

ISO 28000

Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

Penalties

ISO 56002

No legal penalties, loss of conformity or credibility

ISO 28000

No legal penalties, loss of certification or contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 56002 and ISO 28000

ISO 56002 FAQ

ISO 28000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CIS Controls vs APRA CPS 234

Compare CIS Controls v8.1 vs APRA CPS 234: Maps, implementation guides, pitfalls, and strategies for compliance & cyber resilience in finance. Boost security now!

EPA vs ISO 56002

Compare EPA standards vs ISO 56002: Master environmental compliance & innovation systems for strategic edge. Key differences, implementation tips—boost efficiency now!

K-PIPA vs Basel III

Explore K-PIPA vs Basel III: Contrast Korea's consent-driven privacy law with banking capital/liquidity rules. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & best practices for resilient ops now.

ISO 56002

ISO 28000

Quick Verdict

ISO 56002

Key Features

ISO 28000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 56002 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 28000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 56002 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 56002?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 56002?

Does ISO 56002 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 56002 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 56002?

Can ISO 56002 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 56002?

ISO 28000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 28000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 28000?

Does ISO 28000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 28000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 28000?

Can ISO 28000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 28000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CIS Controls vs APRA CPS 234

EPA vs ISO 56002

K-PIPA vs Basel III