ISO 9001
International standard for quality management systems
ISO 31000
International standard for risk management guidelines
Quick Verdict
ISO 9001 certifies quality management systems for consistent delivery across industries, while ISO 31000 provides non-certifiable risk management guidelines. Companies adopt ISO 9001 for market credibility and efficiency; ISO 31000 embeds risk thinking into strategy for resilience.
ISO 9001
ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems – Requirements
Key Features
- Over 1 million certifications in 189 countries
- Risk-based thinking across all processes
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement
- High-Level Structure integrates other standards
- Seven principles guide leadership commitment
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight principles for effective risk management
- Framework emphasizing leadership commitment
- Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
- Customized to organizational context and risks
- Focus on human cultural factors and improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 9001 Details
What It Is
ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems – Requirements is an international certification standard for establishing effective Quality Management Systems (QMS). It provides a flexible, process-oriented framework applicable to any organization, emphasizing risk-based thinking and PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle for consistent quality delivery and improvement.
Key Components
- 10 clauses (4-10 auditable): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
- Built on **7 Quality Management Principlescustomer focus, leadership, engagement of people, process approach, improvement, evidence-based decisions, relationship management
- Over 1 million certifications worldwide; voluntary third-party audits every 3 years with surveillance
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, risk mitigation
- Meets market/regulatory demands, boosts competitiveness and reputation
- Drives cost savings, waste reduction, continual improvement
Implementation Overview
- Gap analysis, process mapping, training, internal audits; 6-12 months typical
- Universal applicability across sizes/industries; integrates via Annex SL
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for enterprise-wide risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations systematically manage uncertainty affecting objectives, applicable to any size, sector, or type. It uses a principles-based, iterative approach emphasizing leadership integration and value creation/protection.
Key Components
- **Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
- No fixed controls; flexible, PDCA-aligned.
- Guidelines only, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and opportunity capture.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supports governance.
- Aligns with regulations indirectly; strategic benefits like better resource allocation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: leadership buy-in, gap analysis, pilot, scale, monitor.
- Universal applicability; focuses on culture, training, tools like GRC platforms.
- Internal audits for assurance; ~180 words.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 9001 | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Quality management systems for consistent product/service delivery | Enterprise risk management principles, framework, and process |
| Industry | All industries, sizes; sector adaptations like medical, petroleum | All organizations, sectors; any risk type, universal applicability |
| Nature | Certifiable standard with auditable requirements | Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary framework |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, third-party certification audits | Monitoring, review, internal evaluation; no formal certification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access restrictions | No penalties; internal governance and opportunity costs |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 9001 and ISO 31000
ISO 9001 FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 50001 vs BRC
Compare ISO 50001 vs BRC: Energy mgmt systems for efficiency vs food safety standards. Discover integration tips, compliance gains & implementation roadmap now. (152)
ISO 9001 vs CCPA
Compare ISO 9001 vs CCPA: Discover how global quality standards drive efficiency & trust, while privacy laws safeguard data. Optimize compliance now!
ISO 17025 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
ISO 17025 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Unpack key differences in lab competence, impartiality, risk management & cyber disclosures. Align standards, boost compliance—read now!