ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 offers voluntary global AI governance certification for trustworthy systems, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity compliance for NY financial firms with strict audits and fines. Organizations adopt ISO for innovation trust, NYDFS for regulatory survival.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems
Key Features
- PDCA methodology tailored for AI lifecycle governance
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls
- High-Level Structure integrates with ISO 27001/9001
- Role-agnostic applicability to AI providers/users/developers
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Dual CEO/CISO annual compliance certification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged access
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
- TPSP security policy with contract mandates
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS). It provides a robust framework to manage AI risks and opportunities responsibly across the full AI lifecycle, using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology and High-Level Structure (HLS) for harmonization.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Annex A includes 38 AI-specific controls addressing data, transparency, integrity, and resiliency.
- Built on PDCA and HLS; supports AI Impact Assessments (AIIAs) for high-risk systems.
- Optional third-party certification via accredited auditors.
Why Organizations Use It
Adoption mitigates AI risks like bias and model drift, ensures ethical practices, and aligns with regulations such as the EU AI Act. Benefits include enhanced trust, competitive differentiation, regulatory preparedness, and supply chain resilience. Early adopters like Microsoft gain credibility and efficiencies.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy development, risk assessments, operational controls. Applicable to any size, sector, or AI role (developers, providers, users). Involves training, monitoring KPIs, internal audits; certification requires 3+ months data and external audits, typically 6-12 months total.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a prescriptive state-level framework for financial entities. It mandates risk-based cybersecurity programs to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and system integrity, with phased amendments effective through 2025 emphasizing evidence-based compliance.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO governance, MFA, encryption, TPSP oversight, penetration testing, and 72-hour incident reporting.
- Built on risk assessment foundation (NIST CSF or CRI Profile acceptable).
- Dual CEO/CISO annual certification by April 15, with five-year record retention; enhanced for Class A Companies (e.g., >$20M NY revenue).
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for NY-licensed financial services firms (banks, insurers, etc.).
- Reduces enforcement risks (multi-million fines like Robinhood's $30M).
- Enhances resilience, vendor management, and stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance first, then MFA/asset inventory (up to Nov 2025).
- Applies to Covered Entities in NY financial sector; risk-proportionate for size.
- No external certification but DFS examinations and evidence audits required. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | AI management systems lifecycle governance | Financial services cybersecurity program |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any AI role | NY financial services licensees only |
| Nature | Voluntary international certification standard | Mandatory state regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Third-party audits, AIIAs, performance metrics | Annual pen tests, vulnerability scans, CISO reports |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal fines | Multi-million fines, consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 23 NYCRR 500
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 17025 vs AS9120B
Compare ISO 17025 vs AS9120B: Lab competence & impartiality vs aerospace distributor QMS. Key differences, compliance tips & strategic insights—boost your ops now!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs C-TPAT
Unlock FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs C-TPAT: Compare electronic records compliance with supply chain security. Strategies, gaps & implementation for life sciences. Boost readiness now!
ITIL vs ISO 27701
Compare ITIL vs ISO 27701: ITSM excellence meets privacy governance. Align services with business via SVS & 34 practices, extend to PIMS controls. Choose wisely!