Standards Comparison

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    Voluntary
    2023

    International standard for artificial intelligence management systems

    VS

    AS9110C

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for aviation maintenance quality management.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 provides AI governance frameworks for all organizations worldwide, while AS9110C delivers quality management for aerospace MROs. Companies adopt 42001 for ethical AI compliance and trust; AS9110C for regulatory alignment, safety, and market access.

    AI Management

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
    • Provides 38 AI-specific controls in Annex A
    • Employs PDCA cycle for continual AI improvement
    • Uses High-Level Structure for ISO integration
    • Manages risks across full AI lifecycle stages
    Quality Management

    AS9110C

    AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
    • Configuration management and product traceability controls
    • Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention processes
    • Human factors integration in root cause analysis
    • Dedicated safety policy and leadership accountability

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems is the world's first international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS). It provides a risk-based framework using Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology and High-Level Structure (HLS) to govern AI responsibly across its lifecycle, applicable to any organization involved in AI development, provision, or use.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, and improvement.
    • Annex A lists 38 AI-specific controls for risks like bias, transparency, and resiliency.
    • Built on PDCA and HLS for integration with ISO 9001/27001.
    • Optional third-party certification via accredited audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives ethical AI, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU AI Act), risk mitigation, and innovation. Enhances trust, reputation, procurement advantages, and insurance savings.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased gap analysis, policy development, AIIAs, training, and audits. Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical, faster with existing ISO systems.

    AS9110C Details

    What It Is

    AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) certification standard for aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for continuing airworthiness, using a risk-based thinking approach via PDCA and Annex SL structure.

    Key Components

    • Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, preservation.
    • No fixed control count; focuses on documented information and process effectiveness.
    • Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA).
    • Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability for airworthiness.
    • Enhances market access via OASIS listing, improves on-time delivery.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through proven QMS maturity.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
    • Applies to MROs globally, any size.
    • Requires internal audits, management review before Stage 1/2 certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AI Management Systems across full AI lifecycle
    AS9110C
    Aerospace maintenance, repair, overhaul processes

    Industry

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    All sectors, universal AI applicability worldwide
    AS9110C
    Aerospace MRO organizations globally

    Nature

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Voluntary international certification standard
    AS9110C
    Voluntary aerospace quality management certification

    Testing

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Third-party audits, AIIAs, performance metrics
    AS9110C
    Internal audits, management reviews, surveillance audits

    Penalties

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Loss of certification, reputational damage
    AS9110C
    Loss of certification, regulatory/contract exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and AS9110C

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ

    AS9110C FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages