ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for artificial intelligence management systems
ISO 56002
International standard for innovation management systems guidance
Quick Verdict
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certifies AI management systems for responsible AI governance, while ISO 56002 guides innovation systems for value creation. Companies adopt 42001 for AI compliance and trust; 56002 for structured, repeatable innovation.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system
Key Features
- World's first international standard for AI Management Systems
- PDCA methodology for AI lifecycle governance and improvement
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Annex A with 38 AI-specific risk controls
- HLS integration with ISO 27001 and 9001 standards
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle and HLS alignment for integration
- Leadership commitment with policy and roles
- Risk-opportunity planning and portfolio governance
- End-to-end innovation processes from opportunity to deployment
- KPIs, audits, and continual improvement mechanisms
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system, is the world's first international certification standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It provides a framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve responsible AI governance across the full lifecycle. The standard employs a risk-based Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology, aligned with ISO's High-Level Structure (HLS) for seamless integration.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Annex A38 AI-specific controls for risks like bias, transparency, integrity, resiliency.
- Annex B/C/D: implementation guidance and risk sources.
- Third-party certification by accredited auditors, with 3-year validity and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates AI risks (bias, drift, ethics) and captures opportunities.
- Aligns with EU AI Act, NIST, global regulations.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enhances reputation, accelerates procurement.
- Drives competitive differentiation, insurance savings, innovation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, AIIAs, controls deployment, audits.
- Universal applicability: any size, sector, AI role (provider/user/developer).
- 6-12 months typical, leveraging ISO 27001 synergies.
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard titled Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance. It provides a generic framework for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and improve an innovation management system (IMS). Applicable across all sectors, sizes, and innovation types, it uses a PDCA cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) for structured, adaptable innovation governance.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Eight principles including value realization, future-focused leadership, and uncertainty management.
- End-to-end processes: opportunity ID, concept validation, deployment.
- No prescriptive requirements; conformity via audits, links to certifiable ISO 56001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns innovation with strategy, reduces 'zombie projects'.
- Manages uncertainty, improves portfolio ROI.
- Builds stakeholder trust, competitive edge.
- Integrates with ISO 9001/27001 for efficiency.
- Voluntary but drives sustained value.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: awareness, gap analysis, design, pilot, monitor, improve.
- Involves policy, roles, KPIs, training, audits.
- Fits SMEs to enterprises globally; optional certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | AI management systems, lifecycle risks, ethics | Innovation management systems, value creation processes |
| Industry | All sectors using AI globally, any size | All sectors pursuing innovation globally, any size |
| Nature | Requirements standard, certifiable | Guidance standard, non-certifiable |
| Testing | Third-party audits, AIIAs, metrics monitoring | Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessment |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No certification or penalties, voluntary guidance |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and ISO 56002
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!
Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMI vs GDPR UK
Compare CMMI maturity models vs UK GDPR compliance: Boost process predictability and data security. Uncover synergies, gaps, and strategies for seamless IT integration now.
DORA vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
Compare DORA vs CSL: EU financial resilience meets China's data fortress. Key diffs in ICT risks, testing, third-party oversight & localization. Master global compliance now!
ISO 27017 vs Basel III
Compare ISO 27017 vs Basel III: Cloud security controls vs banking resilience standards. Gain key insights on compliance, risks & strategies for CSPs & finance. Dive in now!