Standards Comparison

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    Voluntary
    2023

    International standard for AI management systems

    VS

    MAS TRM

    Mandatory
    2021

    Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 provides voluntary global AI governance certification for all organizations, while MAS TRM enforces technology risk management for Singapore FIs via supervisory scrutiny. Companies adopt 42001 for trust and compliance; TRM to avoid fines and ensure resilience.

    AI Management

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA methodology for AI lifecycle governance
    • Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
    • Annex A 38 AI-specific controls
    • High-Level Structure integrates with ISO MSS
    • Risk-opportunity balance across AI roles
    Technology Risk Management

    MAS TRM

    MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board and senior management accountability for oversight
    • Proportional controls based on asset criticality
    • Third-party risk assessment and ongoing monitoring
    • Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
    • Comprehensive TRM framework with risk lifecycle

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It provides requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve AIMS using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology, applicable to any organization developing, providing, or using AI.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
    • Annex A lists 38 AI-specific controls for risks like bias, transparency, and resiliency.
    • Built on High-Level Structure (HLS/Annex SL) for ISO interoperability.
    • Optional certification via accredited third-party audits, with 3-year validity and surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives ethical AI, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU AI Act), risk mitigation, and innovation. Enhances trust, reputation, procurement advantages, and insurance savings. Supports UN SDGs and competitive differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased gap analysis, AIIAs, training, and tools like ISMS.online. Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with existing ISO systems. Requires leadership, documented processes, and continual monitoring.

    MAS TRM Details

    What It Is

    MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidance issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based framework focused on managing technology and cyber risks to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data. The approach emphasizes proportionality based on risk profile, complexity, and service criticality.

    Key Components

    • Covers 15 sections including governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, and audits.
    • Synthesizes 12 core principles like board accountability, asset classification, third-party oversight, and defence-in-depth.
    • No fixed controls; relies on policies, standards, and continuous improvement with independent assurance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines and enforcement.
    • Enhances cyber resilience, operational stability, and customer trust.
    • Supports digital transformation while mitigating ecosystem risks.
    • Builds competitive edge through robust governance and metrics.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Risk-based rolloutInventory assets, assess risks, design controls, test resilience.
    • Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size.
    • No formal certification; demonstrated via audits, metrics, and board reporting. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AI Management Systems (AIMS) lifecycle governance
    MAS TRM
    Technology/cyber risk across financial operations

    Industry

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    All sectors worldwide, any organization size
    MAS TRM
    Singapore financial institutions only

    Nature

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Voluntary international certification standard
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory guidelines with enforcement consideration

    Testing

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Third-party audits for certification, AIIAs
    MAS TRM
    Annual PT for internet systems, VA, DR tests

    Penalties

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    MAS TRM
    Fines, license revocation, executive prohibitions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and MAS TRM

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ

    MAS TRM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages