ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
SAMA CSF
Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 offers voluntary global AI governance for all sectors via PDCA and certification, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi finance firms through audits and penalties, ensuring compliance and resilience.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence — Management system
Key Features
- World's first PDCA-based AI Management System standard
- Mandates AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- Annex A provides 38 AI-specific controls
- Integrates with ISO 27001 via High-Level Structure
- Manages full AI lifecycle risks and opportunities
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
- Four domains including third-party security
- Board and CISO governance requirements
- Principle-based risk management approach
- Sector-specific controls for payments and e-banking
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence — Management system is the world's first international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It uses a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology and High-Level Structure (HLS) to govern AI risks and opportunities across the full lifecycle, applicable to any organization as AI developer, provider, producer, or user.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Annex A lists 38 AI-specific controls for data, transparency, integrity, and resiliency.
- Built on ISO references like 22989 (AI concepts) and 31000 (risk management).
- Third-party certification via accredited auditors, with 3-year validity and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives ethical AI, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU AI Act), risk mitigation (bias, drift), and competitive trust. Early adopters like Microsoft and UiPath gain procurement advantages, insurance discounts, and reputation.
Implementation Overview
Phased gap analysis, AIIAs, training, and tools (e.g., ISMS.online). Suited for all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical, faster with ISO 27001 integration. Requires audits and continual monitoring.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. Its primary purpose is to ensure cybersecurity resilience through governance, risk management, and controls, using a principle-based, risk-oriented approach with a six-level maturity model targeting at least Level 3.
Key Components
- Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
- Over 100 subcontrols across subdomains like IAM, incident response, payment systems.
- Built on NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; compliance via self-assessment and SAMA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for banks, insurers, financing firms to avoid penalties, audits.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, enables partnerships.
- Builds trust, competitive edge in digital finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, deployment, monitoring.
- Applies to all SAMA entities; board oversight, training key.
- Self-assessments, no external certification but SAMA review required. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | AI lifecycle governance, risks, ethics across PDCA | Cybersecurity domains: governance, risk, operations, third-party |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any AI role/size | Saudi financial institutions only (banks, insurance) |
| Nature | Voluntary international certification standard | Mandatory regulatory framework for compliance |
| Testing | Third-party audits, AIIAs, performance metrics | Self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model reviews |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Fines, audits, license risks, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and SAMA CSF
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PCI DSS vs CIS Controls
Compare PCI DSS vs CIS Controls: PCI's 12 payment-focused requirements vs CIS's 18 prioritized safeguards. Uncover overlaps, gaps & strategies to enhance compliance & cyber resilience today.
ISO 9001 vs BREEAM
ISO 9001 vs BREEAM: Compare quality management excellence with sustainable building certification. Uncover key differences, benefits & choose wisely for compliance success!
ISO 31000 vs LEED
Discover ISO 31000 vs LEED: Risk guidelines vs green building certification. Compare frameworks, integrate for resilient projects, and elevate compliance + sustainability now!