Standards Comparison

    J-SOX

    Mandatory
    2008

    Japan's ICFR regulation for listed companies under FIEA

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

    Quick Verdict

    J-SOX ensures reliable financial reporting for Japanese listed firms via ICFR assessments, while APRA CPS 234 mandates cyber resilience for Australian financials with strict testing and notifications. Companies adopt them for regulatory compliance and investor trust.

    Financial Reporting

    J-SOX

    Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory ICFR for 3,800 listed companies and subsidiaries
    • Principles-based flexibility with rigorous documentation demands
    • Explicit central focus on IT governance and controls
    • Management assessment plus external auditor attestation
    • Risk-based scoping using COSO plus IT response
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic risk-based testing of controls
    • Third-party information asset coverage required
    • Internal audit assurance including vendors

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    J-SOX Details

    What It Is

    J-SOX, or Japan's internal control over financial reporting under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) promulgated in 2006, is a regulatory framework effective April 2008. It mandates management assessment of ICFR for listed companies, emphasizing principles-based, risk-based approaches with COSO alignment plus explicit IT response.

    Key Components

    • Five COSO components plus IT response and asset preservation.
    • Entity-level, process-level, ITGC controls.
    • Risk-based scoping, key controls identification.
    • Management evaluation with external auditor attestation on report reliability.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for ~3,800 listed firms and subsidiaries to ensure financial transparency.
    • Mitigates misstatement risks, builds investor trust.
    • Enhances governance, reduces audit costs via efficiency.
    • Strategic benefits: operational resilience, automation leverage.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance, scoping, design, testing, monitoring.
    • Targets listed companies in Japan; multinationals with Japanese entities.
    • Requires documentation, evidence, annual reporting with auditor review.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority for regulated financial entities. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates maintaining information security capabilities commensurate with threats to minimize incidents impacting confidentiality, integrity, or availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach emphasizing governance, testing, and notification.

    Key Components

    • Governance: Board ultimate responsibility (para 13), defined roles (para 14).
    • Risk management: Asset classification by criticality/sensitivity (para 20), commensurate controls (para 21).
    • Incident response: Detection mechanisms, annual plan testing (paras 23-26).
    • Assurance: Systematic testing (paras 27-31), internal audit (paras 32-34).
    • Reporting: 72-hour material incident notification, 10-day control weakness alerts (paras 35-36). No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes with third-party extensions.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (ADIs, insurers, super funds). Drives cyber resilience, regulatory compliance, reduced operational risk, stakeholder protection, and supply-chain accountability. Enhances trust and avoids penalties.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls/testing, TPRM integration. Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; requires independent audits, no formal certification but APRA supervision.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    J-SOX
    ICFR for financial reporting
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security and cyber resilience

    Industry

    J-SOX
    Japanese listed companies
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial institutions

    Nature

    J-SOX
    Mandatory securities law
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential standard

    Testing

    J-SOX
    Annual management assessment, auditor review
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic testing, internal audit assurance

    Penalties

    J-SOX
    FSA fines, reputational damage
    APRA CPS 234
    APRA enforcement, supervisory actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about J-SOX and APRA CPS 234

    J-SOX FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages