What is the primary objective of **J-SOX**?

**The primary objective of J-SOX is to ensure the reliability of financial reporting through effective internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for listed companies.** Embedded in the **Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)** promulgated June 14, 2006, and effective April 2008, J-SOX requires management to design, evaluate, and report on ICFR, covering consolidated financial statements, Securities Report disclosures, asset preservation, and IT response, supported by **Business Accounting Council (BAC)** Implementation Guidance from February 2007.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **J-SOX**?

**J-SOX applies to approximately 3,800 listed companies in Japan and their foreign subsidiaries.** Under the **FIEA**, these entities must establish and assess ICFR on a consolidated basis, including equity-method affiliates impacting financial reporting. Management bears primary responsibility, with external auditors attesting to the reliability of management's internal control reports.

Does **J-SOX** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, J-SOX requires external auditors to audit and attest to the reliability of management's internal control report.** Management performs the ICFR assessment and submits the report as part of Securities Report filings; independent accountants provide assurance on its reliability, distinct from direct ICFR attestation.

How often should an assessment for **J-SOX** be performed?

**J-SOX assessments are performed annually as part of fiscal year-end ICFR evaluations.** Management evaluates effectiveness at fiscal year-end for consolidated reporting, with ongoing monitoring and separate evaluations for changes like system implementations or acquisitions, aligned to the annual Securities Report filing cycle.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **J-SOX**?

**Non-compliance with J-SOX can result in FSA enforcement, fines, listing suspensions, reputational damage, and market penalties.** Deficient ICFR reports under FIEA may lead to administrative sanctions, share price declines (up to 19% post-material weakness disclosure), elevated audit costs (over 60% increase), and executive liability for inaccurate certifications.

Can **J-SOX** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, J-SOX aligns closely with the COSO Internal Control—Integrated Framework's five components.** It incorporates **Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information & Communication, and Monitoring**, augmented by explicit IT response and asset preservation objectives, facilitating risk-based ICFR design and evaluation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **J-SOX**?

**The first step is to establish governance with executive sponsorship and a cross-functional steering committee.** Secure CFO/CEO commitment, define scope using materiality thresholds (e.g., 5% of pre-tax income), appoint a program owner, and adopt COSO for risk assessment, ensuring ITGC prioritization and documentation standards.

What is the primary objective of **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for organizations that procure, store, split, and resell aerospace parts without altering product characteristics.** Built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause high-level structure, it adds over 100 aerospace-specific requirements addressing distribution risks like loss of traceability, counterfeit/suspected unapproved parts, documentation errors, and external provider controls. This ensures chain-of-custody integrity, product safety, and conformity in aviation, space, and defense supply chains.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B applies to stockist distributors, pass-through distributors, and those performing batch splitting in aviation, space, and defense industries.** It targets organizations procuring, storing, and reselling parts without modifying characteristics, excluding value-added activities like machining or maintenance/repair. Certification is not legally mandatory but is a commercial requirement from OEMs and primes for supply chain approval, with ~2,442 global certifications (836 in the U.S.) as of May 2023 enabling OASIS listing and market access.

Does **AS9120B** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9120B requires third-party certification through accredited registrars via a two-stage audit process.** Stage 1 reviews documentation and scope; Stage 2 verifies implementation and effectiveness per AS9101F criteria. Ongoing surveillance audits occur annually, with recertification every three years, ensuring IAQG oversight and OASIS database listing for supplier visibility.

How often should an assessment for **AS9120B** be performed?

**AS9120B requires internal audits at planned intervals to cover the entire QMS at least annually.** Management reviews occur at defined intervals, typically quarterly or semi-annually, evaluating performance data, risks, audits, and supplier trends. Risk-based monitoring of key processes like traceability and counterfeit prevention must be continuous, with effectiveness verified through Clause 9 evaluation.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9120B**?

**Non-compliance with AS9120B risks commercial exclusion from OEM supply chains, loss of OASIS listing, and audit nonconformities leading to certification denial or suspension.** It exposes organizations to contract penalties, recalls, reputational damage, and safety liabilities from counterfeit parts or traceability failures, potentially halting aerospace business participation.

Can **AS9120B** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**AS9120B aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, enabling seamless mapping and integration.** Its HLS facilitates compatibility with other management systems, though aerospace additions (e.g., counterfeit prevention, traceability) require specific augmentations. Organizations with ISO 9001 foundations can transition by addressing ~100 distributor-specific clauses.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9120B**?

**The first step is conducting a formal gap analysis against AS9120B clauses using a certified checklist to identify current QMS deficiencies.** Form a cross-functional team to document scope, context (Clause 4), and "not applicable" justifications (e.g., Clause 8.3 design), prioritizing high-risk areas like supplier controls and traceability for a risk-based implementation plan.

J-SOX vs AS9120B

Standards Comparison

J-SOX

Mandatory

2008

Japanese regulation for ICFR in listed companies

AS9120B

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace standard for distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention.

Quick Verdict

J-SOX mandates ICFR for Japanese listed firms to ensure financial reliability via management assessment and audits. AS9120B certifies aerospace distributors for traceability and counterfeit prevention. Companies adopt J-SOX for regulatory compliance, AS9120B for supply chain access.

Financial Reporting

J-SOX

Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates ICFR for 3,800 listed companies and subsidiaries
Principles-based flexibility with rigorous documentation demands
Explicit Response to IT controls beyond COSO framework
Management assessment audited for reliability by externals
Risk-based scoping emphasizing ITGC and key controls

Quality Management

AS9120B

AS9120B Quality Management Systems – Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
Enhanced external provider evaluation and flowdown
Configuration management in distribution operations
Risk-based thinking integrated with QMS planning

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

J-SOX Details

What It Is

J-SOX, or Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) internal control provisions, is a regulatory framework mandating internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for listed companies. Promulgated in 2006 and effective April 2008, it requires management-led design, evaluation, and reporting using a principles-based, risk-based approach aligned with COSO plus explicit IT response.

Key Components

Five COSO components plus Response to IT.
Entity-level, process-level, ITGC, and application controls.
Focus on material misstatement risks, key controls, and Securities Report disclosures.
Management assessment with external auditor attestation to report reliability.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances financial reporting reliability, investor trust, and market transparency. Mandatory for ~3,800 listed firms and subsidiaries; reduces restatement risks, audit costs via efficiency. Builds governance, IT resilience, and competitive edge in capital markets.

Implementation Overview

**Phased risk-based rolloutgovernance setup, scoping, control design, testing, monitoring. Targets listed Japanese firms/multinationals; involves documentation, ITGC, continuous monitoring. No certification but FSA oversight and annual filings.

AS9120B Details

What It Is

AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aerospace distributors, built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure. It targets organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without alteration, using a risk-based approach to address distribution risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.

Key Components

Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements beyond ISO 9001.
Pillars: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, preservation, supplier controls), performance evaluation, improvement.
Core principles: PDCA cycle, process approach.
Certification via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
Mitigates risks of nonconformities, counterfeits, recalls.
Builds stakeholder trust, enhances market access (2,442 global certifications).
Drives efficiency, reduces costs via standardized controls.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
Requires internal audits, management reviews, certification audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	J-SOX	AS9120B
Scope	Internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR)	Quality management for aerospace parts distribution
Industry	Japanese listed companies and subsidiaries	Global aerospace distributors and stockists
Nature	Mandatory securities regulation under FIEA	Voluntary IAQG certification standard
Testing	Annual management assessment and auditor review	Internal audits, certification audits, surveillance
Penalties	FSA fines, reputational damage, market consequences	Loss of certification, exclusion from supply chains

Scope

J-SOX

Internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR)

AS9120B

Quality management for aerospace parts distribution

Industry

J-SOX

Japanese listed companies and subsidiaries

AS9120B

Global aerospace distributors and stockists

Nature

J-SOX

Mandatory securities regulation under FIEA

AS9120B

Voluntary IAQG certification standard

Testing

J-SOX

Annual management assessment and auditor review

AS9120B

Internal audits, certification audits, surveillance

Penalties

J-SOX

FSA fines, reputational damage, market consequences

AS9120B

Loss of certification, exclusion from supply chains

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about J-SOX and AS9120B

J-SOX FAQ

AS9120B FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 19600 vs ISO 27017

Compare ISO 19600 vs ISO 27017: Compliance CMS guidelines (withdrawn, predates 37301) vs cloud security controls extending 27001/02. Build resilient governance—explore now!

EPA vs J-SOX

Explore EPA vs J-SOX: U.S. environmental standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) vs Japan's ICFR regime. Key differences, compliance risks & strategies for global execs. Master both now!

CCPA vs GLBA

CCPA vs GLBA: California's broad consumer rights (know, delete, opt-out) vs federal financial privacy notices & safeguards. Master key differences, compliance strategies & risks now.

J-SOX

AS9120B

Quick Verdict

J-SOX

Key Features

AS9120B

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

J-SOX Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9120B Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

J-SOX FAQ

What is the primary objective of J-SOX?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with J-SOX?

Does J-SOX require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for J-SOX be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with J-SOX?

Can J-SOX be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing J-SOX?

AS9120B FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9120B?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9120B?

Does AS9120B require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9120B be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9120B?

Can AS9120B be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9120B?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 19600 vs ISO 27017

EPA vs J-SOX

CCPA vs GLBA