K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent personal data protection law
Australian Privacy Act
Australian federal law regulating personal information handling.
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates granular consent and CPOs for Korean data handlers, while Australian Privacy Act requires reasonable security steps and NDB for Aussie entities. Companies adopt K-PIPA for Korean market access, Privacy Act for Australian compliance and trust.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandatory CPO with independence and qualifications
- Granular explicit consent for sensitive data
- 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
- Extraterritorial reach targeting Korean users
- Revenue-based fines up to 3% turnover
Australian Privacy Act
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
Key Features
- 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) for data lifecycle
- Notifiable Data Breaches scheme with serious harm notifications
- APP 11 reasonable steps for information security and retention
- APP 8 accountability for cross-border disclosures
- OAIC enforcement with up to AUD 50M penalties
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information by public and private entities, including foreign operators targeting Koreans. Its consent-centric, risk-based approach emphasizes transparency, minimization, and accountability enforced by the PIPC.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, explicit consent.
- Obligations: mandatory CPO appointment, security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability in 10 days).
- Breach response: 72-hour notifications; cross-border transfers via consent or certifications.
- No fixed controls count; scaled for large entities with fines to 3% revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal mandate avoids fines (e.g., Google's $50M), builds trust, enables EU adequacy flows. Reduces breach risks, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization, enhances reputation in privacy-sensitive markets.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, CPO governance, technical controls, training, audits. Applies universally to data handlers; no certification but PIPC guidelines/ISMS-P. Demands Korean policies, vendor DPAs for multinationals.
Australian Privacy Act Details
What It Is
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's foundational federal privacy regulation for handling personal information by government agencies and private organizations exceeding AUD 3 million turnover. It employs a principles-based, risk-calibrated approach across the data lifecycle, balancing privacy protection with transborder flows.
Key Components
- 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) governing collection, use, disclosure, security, quality, and rights.
- Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme mandating notifications for serious harm risks.
- OAIC oversight with civil penalties up to AUD 50 million or 30% turnover. Compliance model relies on self-governance, audits, and enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance for in-scope entities avoiding penalties.
- Enhances risk management, breach resilience, and vendor governance.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supports data-driven innovation.
- Prepares for reforms like children's privacy codes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: discovery/gap analysis, policy/controls design, deployment/training, incident readiness, ongoing audits. Targets medium-large organizations with Australian links; no certification but OAIC assessments apply. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | Australian Privacy Act |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal/sensitive/UID data processing lifecycle | Personal/sensitive info handling via 13 APPs |
| Industry | All sectors, domestic/foreign targeting Koreans | Agencies/large private orgs, health/credit SBOs |
| Nature | Mandatory law, PIPC fines/criminal sanctions | Mandatory principles, OAIC civil penalties |
| Testing | CPO audits, security guidelines, no private DPIAs | Reasonable steps security, PIAs, OAIC audits |
| Penalties | 3% revenue cap KRW 3bn, up to 5yrs jail | AUD 50M or 30% turnover, civil penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and Australian Privacy Act
K-PIPA FAQ
Australian Privacy Act FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST 800-53 vs WELL
Explore NIST 800-53 vs WELL: Compare federal security/privacy controls with health-building standards for integrated risk management, compliance, and occupant wellness. Optimize now!
PMBOK vs GDPR UK
Compare PMBOK vs UK GDPR: Unlock compliance strategies, risk mitigation, and phased implementation frameworks for seamless project success in regulated UK environments. Dive in now!
ISO 9001 vs LGPD
Discover ISO 9001 vs LGPD: Compare quality management excellence with Brazil's data privacy law. Unlock integration strategies for compliance, risk reduction & growth. Dive in!