Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global framework for sustainable built environment certification

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA mandates strict data privacy for Korean operations with fines up to 3% revenue, while BREEAM voluntarily certifies sustainable buildings for market premiums. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance; BREEAM for ESG value, energy savings, and asset uplift.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer appointment for all handlers
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data processing
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Extraterritorial reach targeting foreign entities monitoring Koreans
    • Revenue-based fines up to 3% of annual turnover
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based scoring with weighted sustainability categories
    • Third-party certification by licensed assessors and BRE
    • Scheme-specific standards for buildings, infrastructure, in-use
    • Evidence-driven compliance via technical manuals and KBCNs
    • Focus on whole-life carbon, biodiversity, and resilience

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data privacy regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information by domestic and foreign entities processing Korean residents' data. Employing a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it covers personal, sensitive (e.g., health, biometrics), and unique ID data (e.g., resident numbers).

    Key Components

    • Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability.
    • Obligations: mandatory CPO appointment, granular consents, security measures per 2024 Guidelines, data subject rights (access, erasure, portability in 10 days).
    • Breach response: 72-hour notifications; cross-border transfers via consent or certifications.
    • Enforcement by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal compliance avoids massive fines (e.g., Google's $50M); enhances trust, enables EU adequacy flows, supports AI innovation via pseudonymization. Builds competitive edge in privacy-sensitive markets.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, data mapping, PbD integration, CPO governance, training, audits. Applies to all data handlers globally targeting Koreans; no certification but PIPC oversight and voluntary ISMS-P.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses buildings, infrastructure, and communities across lifecycles. Its credit-based, weighted scoring methodology evaluates environmental, health, and resilience performance.

    Key Components

    • 10 core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
    • Credits earned via evidence against scheme-specific manuals; weighted scores yield ratings (Pass to Outstanding).
    • Supported by Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs) and third-party assurance via licensed assessors and BRE audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction), asset value uplift (up to 30%), and ESG alignment.
    • Meets planning incentives, investor demands, and EU Taxonomy; mitigates risks like regulatory changes.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through credible, comparable certifications.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased integration: pre-assessment, design, construction, certification, In-Use monitoring.
    • Early assessor/AP appointment essential; applies globally to all sizes via schemes like New Construction, In-Use.
    • Requires evidence gathering, training, and BRE certification (voluntary but market-driven).

    Key Differences

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection and privacy
    BREEAM
    Building sustainability and environmental performance

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors processing Korean data
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory national privacy law
    BREEAM
    Voluntary sustainability certification

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    CPO audits, breach assessments
    BREEAM
    Assessor-led credit verification, BRE audits

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    Fines up to 3% revenue, imprisonment
    BREEAM
    No penalties, loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and BREEAM

    K-PIPA FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages