K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent personal data protection regulation
CMMI
Global framework for process maturity and improvement.
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates data privacy for Korean residents with consent, rights, and breach rules, enforced by fines up to 3% revenue. CMMI is a voluntary process maturity framework for predictable delivery via appraisals. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance, CMMI for operational excellence.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act
Key Features
- Mandatory independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
- Granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
- 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
- Extraterritorial scope targeting foreign Korean user services
- 10-day response deadlines for data subject rights
CMMI
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
Key Features
- Maturity Levels 0-5 for staged organizational progression
- 25 Practice Areas across Doing, Managing, Enabling, Improving
- Staged and continuous capability representations
- SCAMPI A/B/C appraisals for benchmarking
- Generic practices ensuring process institutionalization
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA, or Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and deletion of personal, sensitive, and unique identification information by domestic and foreign handlers targeting Korean residents. Adopting a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it emphasizes transparency, minimization, and accountability enforced by the PIPC.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, explicit consent.
- Obligations: mandatory CPOs, granular consents, security measures (encryption, logs), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability in 10 days).
- Breach response: 72-hour notifications; cross-border transfers via consent or certifications.
- No fixed controls count; compliance via audits, guidelines; fines up to 3% revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for data handlers, it mitigates KRW billions fines (e.g., Google $50M), builds trust, enables EU adequacy flows. Strategic benefits include privacy-by-design, reduced breaches, market access in Asia-Pacific.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, data mapping, PbD integration, training, audits. Applies universally to businesses processing Korean data; no certification but PIPC oversight, ISMS-P for transfers. Typical for multinationals via localized reps.
CMMI Details
What It Is
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a performance improvement framework developed by Carnegie Mellon’s SEI and now governed by ISACA. It provides a structured approach to process institutionalization across development, services, and acquisition, using maturity and capability levels to enhance predictability and quality.
Key Components
- 4 Category Areas (Doing, Managing, Enabling, Improving) with 12 Capability Areas and 25 Practice Areas in v2.0.
- Maturity Levels 0-5 (staged) or Capability Levels 0-3 (continuous).
- Generic practices for institutionalization; specific practices per area.
- SCAMPI appraisals (A/B/C) for certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Improves delivery predictability, reduces rework, boosts ROI (e.g., 34% cost savings).
- Meets contractual requirements in defense, regulated sectors.
- Enhances risk management, stakeholder trust, competitive bidding.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assessment, piloting, rollout, appraisal.
- Suits mid-to-large orgs in IT, software, services globally.
- Involves training, tooling, change management; formal appraisals optional but benchmarked.
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | CMMI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection, consent, rights, breaches | Process improvement, maturity levels, practice areas |
| Industry | All sectors handling Korean data, extraterritorial | Software, IT, defense, services worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory data privacy law, fines enforced | Voluntary process maturity framework, appraisals |
| Testing | Security audits, breach notifications, no formal cert | SCAMPI appraisals (A/B/C), periodic sustainment |
| Penalties | 3% revenue fines, imprisonment, orders | No legal penalties, loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and CMMI
K-PIPA FAQ
CMMI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers
Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27032 vs ISO 27017
Compare ISO 27032 vs ISO 27017: Internet cybersecurity guidelines vs cloud controls. Discover differences, synergies for ISMS, and implementation strategies to boost resilience now!
ISA 95 vs ISO 20000
Compare ISA 95 vs ISO 20000: Bridge enterprise-control gaps with ISA 95's manufacturing models; master IT services via ISO 20000's SMS. Optimize IT/OT now!
ISO 26000 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Compare ISO 26000 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023—guidance on SR meets certifiable AI management. Discover differences, synergies for ethical governance & sustainability. Dive in now!