K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection
HIPAA
US regulation for health information privacy and security
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates granular consent and CPOs for Korean personal data handlers globally, while HIPAA enforces privacy, security, and breach rules for US healthcare entities. Companies adopt K-PIPA for Korea market access, HIPAA for health compliance.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
- Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
- Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
- Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
- Imposes fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
Key Features
- Risk analysis and management for ePHI safeguards
- Minimum necessary standard for PHI uses/disclosures
- Breach notification within 60 days presumption model
- Business associate agreements with direct liability
- Individual rights including access to PHI
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA, or Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data privacy regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information by public and private entities, including foreign operators targeting Koreans. Employing a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it emphasizes explicit opt-ins, data minimization, and accountability.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy.
- Obligations: mandatory CPOs, granular consents, security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
- Breach response: 72-hour notifications; cross-border transfers via consent or certifications like ISMS-P.
- Enforcement by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
Compliance avoids severe penalties (e.g., Google's $50M fine), builds trust, enables market access, and supports AI/data innovation via pseudonymization. Enhances reputation and aligns with GDPR for adequacy.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, CPO appointment, policy development, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all data handlers domestically/extraterritorially; no certification but PIPC guidelines and voluntary ISMS-P recommended. Suits all sizes, especially large entities with scaled duties.
HIPAA Details
What It Is
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) is a US federal regulation establishing national standards for protecting individuals' health information. It focuses on privacy, security, and breach notification for protected health information (PHI) and electronic PHI (ePHI), using a risk-based, flexible approach scalable to organization size.
Key Components
- **Three core rulesPrivacy Rule (uses/disclosures), Security Rule (safeguards), Breach Notification Rule.
- Over 100 requirements across administrative, physical, technical safeguards.
- Built on minimum necessary principle, individual rights, business associate agreements.
- Compliance via self-attestation, OCR audits, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for covered entities (providers, plans, clearinghouses) and business associates.
- Mitigates breach risks, penalties up to $2M annually.
- Enhances patient trust, operational efficiency, vendor management.
- Enables secure data flows for care, payment, operations.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assess risks, build controls, operate/monitor.
- Involves risk analysis, policies, training, BAAs, audits.
- Applies to US healthcare entities handling PHI; ongoing program.
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | HIPAA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data processing, consent, transfers | Health information privacy, security, breaches |
| Industry | All sectors handling Korean data | Healthcare providers, plans, associates |
| Nature | Mandatory national law, PIPC enforcement | Mandatory US regulation, OCR enforcement |
| Testing | CPO audits, security guidelines, no DPIAs | Risk analysis, periodic evaluations, audits |
| Penalties | 3% revenue fines, criminal up to 5 years | Tiered civil penalties up to $50K/violation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and HIPAA
K-PIPA FAQ
HIPAA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISA 95 vs HITRUST CSF
Discover ISA 95 vs HITRUST CSF: Compare manufacturing integration models with cybersecurity frameworks for secure enterprise-control systems. Boost compliance now!
Six Sigma vs PRINCE2
Compare Six Sigma vs PRINCE2: DMAIC data-driven quality vs structured governance & stages. Key principles, belts, tools—choose the best for process excellence. Dive in!
GMP vs AS9110C
Discover GMP vs AS9110C: Compare pharma/food quality standards with aerospace MRO systems. Key differences in compliance, risks & controls for global ops. Optimize yours now!