Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent personal data protection regulation

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA mandates data privacy for Korean residents with consent and breach rules, while ISO 13485 certifies medical device QMS for safety. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance in Korea, ISO 13485 for global market access and quality assurance.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer appointment for all handlers
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Extraterritorial scope targeting foreign entities monitoring Koreans
    • Fines up to 3% annual global revenue
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based controls for device safety and compliance
    • Design and development validation requirements
    • Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
    • Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
    • Traceability and medical device file mandates

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA, or Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data privacy regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal, sensitive, and unique identification information by domestic and foreign entities processing Korean residents' data. Employing a consent-centric, risk-based approach with extraterritorial reach.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability via mandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs).
    • Data subject rights: access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection to automated decisions (10-day responses).
    • Security: encryption, access controls, 72-hour breach notifications.
    • No certification model; enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal compliance avoids massive fines (e.g., Google's KRW 70B); enables market access, builds trust, supports EU adequacy for transfers. Mitigates risks from breaches, enhances governance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, data mapping, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all data handlers globally targeting Koreans; no certification but PIPC guidelines and ISMS-P aid compliance.

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It is a certifiable QMS framework specifically for medical device organizations, emphasizing risk-based controls to ensure devices meet customer and regulatory requirements across the lifecycle, from design to post-market surveillance.

    Key Components

    • Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
    • Over 20 documented procedures required, built on process approach and ISO 9001 compatibility.
    • Core principles: traceability, validation, risk management (per ISO 14971), and regulatory integration.
    • Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage 1/2 audits and surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
    • Reduces risks like recalls via supplier controls and CAPA.
    • Builds stakeholder trust and competitive edge in supply chains.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
    • Applies to manufacturers, suppliers globally; scales by size.
    • Involves eQMS, cross-functional teams; certification every 3 years. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection, consent, rights, breaches
    ISO 13485
    Medical device QMS, lifecycle, risk, validation

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors handling Korean data, extraterritorial
    ISO 13485
    Medical devices, manufacturers, suppliers globally

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory law, PIPC enforcement, fines
    ISO 13485
    Voluntary certification standard, audits

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    Security audits, breach simulations, CPO oversight
    ISO 13485
    Internal audits, process validation, certification audits

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    3% revenue fines, imprisonment, orders
    ISO 13485
    Certification loss, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and ISO 13485

    K-PIPA FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages