K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent data privacy regulation
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates strict data privacy for all handling Korean data, emphasizing consent and rights. MAS TRM provides proportionate tech risk guidelines for Singapore FIs, focusing on cyber resilience. Organizations adopt K-PIPA for compliance, MAS TRM for supervisory trust.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
- Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
- Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
- Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
- Imposes fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines
Key Features
- Board/senior management accountability for oversight
- Proportional implementation by risk profile
- End-to-end lifecycle controls (SDLC to audit)
- Third-party risk management beyond outsourcing
- Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal, sensitive, and unique identification information by public and private entities. Adopting a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it emphasizes explicit opt-ins, data minimization, and accountability, with extraterritorial reach for foreign handlers targeting Koreans.
Key Components
- **Core principlesTransparency, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy.
- **ObligationsMandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs), granular consents, security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
- **Breach response72-hour notifications for significant incidents.
- No certification model; enforced by PIPC via fines up to 3% revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
Compliance avoids severe penalties (e.g., Google's KRW 70B fine), builds trust in privacy-sensitive markets, enables cross-border flows via EU adequacy, and supports AI/innovation through pseudonymization. It mitigates risks from breaches and litigation while enhancing reputation.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, data mapping, governance (CPO appointment), technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all data handlers domestically/foreign; large entities face escalated duties. No formal certification, but PIPC guidelines and ISMS-P aid compliance. (178 words)
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions (FIs). They provide a principles-and-outcomes-based framework focused on governance, cybersecurity, resilience, and operational controls to preserve CIA (confidentiality, integrity, availability) amid digital transformation and cyber threats. Implementation is proportional to risk profile and complexity.
Key Components
- 15 sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure SDLC/DevSecOps, ITSM, resilience, access/cryptography, cyber operations/assessments, third-party management, and audit.
- Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventories, defence-in-depth.
- No fixed controls; emphasises risk-based practices with independent assurance.
Why Organizations Use It
- **Regulatory supervisionMAS assesses observance of spirit; non-compliance risks fines/enforcement.
- Enhances cyber resilience, reduces incidents, builds trust.
- Enables digital innovation securely; competitive edge in Singapore finance.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachGovernance setup, asset inventory, controls, testing, monitoring.
- Targets MAS-supervised FIs (banks, insurers, fintechs); scalable by size.
- No certification; demonstrated via audits, metrics, board reporting.
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection, consent, rights, breaches | Technology/cyber risk governance, resilience, cybersecurity |
| Industry | All sectors processing Korean data | Singapore financial institutions only |
| Nature | Mandatory national privacy law | Supervisory guidelines, proportionate enforcement |
| Testing | Security audits, no mandatory DPIAs for private | Annual PT for internet systems, regular VA/DR tests |
| Penalties | 3% revenue fines, criminal up to 5 years | Supervisory fines, license actions, no fixed cap |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and MAS TRM
K-PIPA FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27001 vs PMBOK
Explore ISO 27001 vs PMBOK: ISO 27001 masters info sec risk mgmt; PMBOK excels in project delivery. Align for compliant, resilient ops. Discover synergies now!
AEO vs APRA CPS 234
Explore AEO vs APRA CPS 234: WCO/EU supply chain security standards vs Australia's financial info sec mandate. Key differences, compliance, benefits & strategies for resilient trade & ops. Dive in now.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 56002
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 56002: Decode compliance for electronic records vs innovation systems. Master risks, controls & strategies for trust. Optimize now!