Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent personal information protection regulation

    VS

    NIST 800-171

    Mandatory
    2020

    U.S. standard protecting CUI in nonfederal systems.

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA mandates granular consent and privacy rights for Korean data handlers, while NIST 800-171 requires CUI security controls for US federal contractors. Companies adopt K-PIPA for Korea market access and NIST 800-171 for DoD contract eligibility.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory independent Chief Privacy Officers for handlers
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
    • 72-hour breach notifications to affected subjects
    • Extraterritorial reach targeting foreign Korean data processors
    • Fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
    Controlled Unclassified Information

    NIST 800-171

    NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Scoped protection for CUI in nonfederal systems
    • 110 requirements across 14-17 control families
    • SSP and POA&M documentation requirements
    • SP 800-171A assessment procedures
    • DFARS contractual enforcement and incident reporting

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA, or Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information of Korean residents, including sensitive data like health and biometrics. Scope covers all data handlers—domestic and foreign—with extraterritorial application. Adopts consent-centric, risk-based approach emphasizing transparency and accountability.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, security.
    • Mandatory CPO appointment, granular consents, 10-day data subject rights (access, erasure, portability).
    • **Security measuresencryption, access controls per 2024 Guidelines; 72-hour breach notifications.
    • No fixed controls count; enforced by PIPC with revenue-based fines up to 3%.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal compliance avoids fines (e.g., Google's KRW 70B); builds trust in privacy-sensitive market. Enables secure cross-border transfers via certifications; supports AI/data innovation with pseudonymization. Enhances reputation, stakeholder confidence amid strict enforcement.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, CPO setup, policy development, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all data processors globally targeting Koreans; no certification but PIPC oversight. Involves data mapping, vendor contracts, breach playbooks—typically 12-18 months for mid-size firms.

    NIST 800-171 Details

    What It Is

    NIST SP 800-171 (Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations) is a U.S. government cybersecurity framework providing security requirements for safeguarding CUI confidentiality. It targets nonfederal systems via a control-based approach tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, emphasizing scoping to CUI-processing components.

    Key Components

    • 17 families in Rev 3 (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management) with ~97-110 requirements.
    • Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M).
    • Built on FIPS 200; companion SP 800-171A for assessments (examine/interview/test).
    • Compliance via self-assessment or third-party (e.g., CMMC Level 2).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandates (e.g., DFARS 252.204-7012 for DoD).
    • Reduces breach risk, ensures procurement eligibility.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, competitive edge in federal supply chains.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, gap analysis, controls, evidence collection.
    • Applies to contractors handling CUI; all sizes, U.S.-focused.
    • Audits via SPRS scoring; ongoing monitoring essential. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data privacy/consent
    NIST 800-171
    CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors targeting Koreans
    NIST 800-171
    US federal contractors/supply chain

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory national privacy law
    NIST 800-171
    Contractual security requirements

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    PIPC audits/guideline compliance
    NIST 800-171
    SSP/POA&M assessments (self/3rd-party)

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    3% revenue fines/imprisonment
    NIST 800-171
    Contract loss/DFARS ineligibility

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and NIST 800-171

    K-PIPA FAQ

    NIST 800-171 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages