Standards Comparison

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's comprehensive personal information protection regulation

    VS

    WELL

    Voluntary
    2014

    Building certification for occupant health and well-being.

    Quick Verdict

    K-PIPA mandates strict data privacy for Korean operations with heavy fines, while WELL is voluntary certification enhancing building health via performance testing. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance, WELL for occupant wellness, productivity, and ESG differentiation.

    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
    • Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
    • Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
    • Imposes fines up to 3% of global annual revenue
    Building Health & Wellness

    WELL

    WELL Building Standard v2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • On-site performance verification testing required
    • 10 core concepts from Air to Community
    • Mandatory Preconditions and points-based Optimizations
    • Tiered certifications: Bronze to Platinum levels
    • Continuous monitoring for ongoing compliance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's primary data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information, including sensitive data and unique identifiers, for all data handlers—domestic and foreign. Adopting a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it emphasizes transparency, purpose limitation, and data minimization.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: explicit consent, security safeguards, data subject rights.
    • Mandatory CPO appointment, technical controls (encryption, access logs), breach response.
    • No fixed control count; obligations scale by entity size (e.g., large handlers notify PIPC).
    • PIPC enforcement with revenue-based fines up to 3%.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Compliance avoids fines (e.g., Google's $50M penalty), builds trust in privacy-sensitive markets, enables EU data flows via adequacy. Mitigates risks from breaches, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization, enhances reputation.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, governance (CPO), technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all processing Korean data; no certification but PIPC guidelines/ISMS-P. Large entities need domestic reps; 12-18 months typical for multinationals.

    WELL Details

    What It Is

    The WELL Building Standard (WELL v2) is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its approach combines mandatory Preconditions with optional Optimizations across 10 concepts.

    Key Components

    • **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
    • 24 Preconditions (mandatory) and 102 Optimizations (points-based).
    • Built on public health and building science research.
    • Certification tiers: Bronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80), with concept minimums at higher levels.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances occupant productivity, retention, and ESG reporting.
    • Differentiates assets with verified health outcomes.
    • Mitigates risks like poor IEQ; boosts rents and values.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via rigorous verification.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years.
    • Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries.
    • Requires third-party review and performance testing.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection and privacy
    WELL
    Building health, wellness, indoor environments

    Industry

    K-PIPA
    All sectors processing Korean data
    WELL
    Real estate, construction, facilities management

    Nature

    K-PIPA
    Mandatory national law with fines
    WELL
    Voluntary performance-based certification

    Testing

    K-PIPA
    No mandatory audits; breach reporting
    WELL
    On-site performance verification testing

    Penalties

    K-PIPA
    Up to 3% revenue fines, imprisonment
    WELL
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about K-PIPA and WELL

    K-PIPA FAQ

    WELL FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages