What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD is to protect the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of natural persons by establishing rules for the processing of personal data.** Enacted as Law No. 13.709/2018 on August 14, 2018, LGPD unifies Brazil's data protection framework, mandating 10 core principles under Article 6—including purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, and accountability—to ensure ethical processing of personal data (information relating to identified or identifiable natural persons, Art. 5 I) and sensitive data (e.g., health, biometrics, Art. 5 II).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and operators processing personal data in Brazil, targeting Brazilian residents, or collected therein must comply with LGPD, regardless of company size or location.** Article 3 establishes extraterritorial scope for any entity offering goods/services to or monitoring Brazilians; controllers (deciding purposes/means, Art. 5 VI) bear primary liability, while operators (processing on instructions, Art. 5 VII) share duties—no thresholds exempt micro/small firms if data is processed.

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) conducts audits under Articles 55-56, but organizations must maintain internal Records of Processing Activities (Art. 37), perform Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing (Art. 38), and demonstrate compliance via governance like DPO appointment (Art. 41); voluntary certifications enhance maturity but are not required.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD assessments, including Records of Processing Activities and DPIAs, must be maintained continuously with updates for changes in processing activities.** ANPD regulations like CD/ANPD No. 02/2022 require simplified records for small entities, while high-risk activities demand ongoing DPIAs (Art. 38); practical guidance recommends quarterly internal reviews, annual full audits, and ad-hoc reassessments for new processing, incidents, or ANPD guidance updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD incurs graduated administrative sanctions by ANPD, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction).** Article 52 outlines 9 sanctions: warnings, daily fines, publicity of infractions, data blocking/deletion, processing suspension (up to 6 months, extendable), and activity prohibition; factors like gravity, cooperation, and safeguards influence severity, plus civil liability for damages (Art. 42).

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD can be mapped to other international frameworks due to shared principles like purpose limitation, transparency, minimization, and data subject rights.** Its 10 principles (Art. 6) and rights (Art. 18: access, correction, deletion, portability) align closely with global regimes, facilitating hybrid programs; ANPD-approved Standard Contractual Clauses (Resolution CD/ANPD No. 19/2024) support transfers, though no adequacy decisions exist yet.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step to implement LGPD is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and conducting comprehensive data mapping to create a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA).** Article 41 requires DPO public disclosure for controllers; Phase 1 gap analysis inventories data flows, purposes, legal bases (Art. 7: 10 options like consent, legitimate interests), sensitive data, and transfers, prioritizing high-risk areas per ANPD guidance.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently provide products and services meeting customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective QMS application and continual improvement.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure (Clauses 4–10) with aviation-specific additions like configuration management, product safety, counterfeit/suspect parts prevention, traceability, preservation, and human factors controls, ensuring continuing airworthiness in repair stations and MRO providers.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to organizations whose primary business is aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul (MRO), or continuing airworthiness management services, including repair stations, OEM MRO divisions, and providers at all supply chain levels.** It targets civil/military environments regardless of size, with no employee/revenue thresholds; compliance is driven by customer contracts, OEM requirements, and listing in the IAQG OASIS database for global recognition.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies, involving Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site implementation audit) audits.** The QMS must be fully operational for at least three months, with a full internal audit cycle and management review completed prior; certification is listed in IAQG OASIS, with surveillance audits annually and recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and results, with at least one full cycle before certification.** Management reviews occur regularly (e.g., semi-annually), using performance data; external surveillance audits are annual, and full recertification every three years, ensuring ongoing QMS effectiveness via Clauses 9.2 and 9.3.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from IAQG OASIS, contract ineligibility with OEMs/airlines, and regulatory sanctions like FAA/EASA Part 145 certificate suspension.** It can lead to rework, safety incidents, litigation, fines (e.g., up to $100k/day), reputational damage, and market exclusion, as customer/regulatory requirements override the standard.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C's Annex SL high-level structure enables direct mapping to ISO 9001:2015 as its baseline, with IAQG correlation matrices aligning to aviation regulations like FAA/EASA Part 145.** It supports integrated management systems without exclusions unless justified in QMS scope, ensuring applicable requirements are addressed for conformity.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step to implement AS9110C is to define the QMS scope, determine internal/external issues (Clause 4), and conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 using IAQG checklists.** Secure executive sponsorship, map regulatory/customer requirements, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with risk-based thinking (Clause 6.1).

LGPD vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive federal law protecting personal data

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

International standard for aviation maintenance quality management

Quick Verdict

LGPD mandates data protection for Brazilian residents' personal data across industries, enforced by ANPD fines. AS9110C is a voluntary QMS certification for aviation MROs ensuring maintenance safety and quality via audits. Companies adopt LGPD for legal compliance, AS9110C for market access.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targeting Brazilian residents' data processing
10 core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
Revenue-based fines up to 2% Brazilian turnover capped R$50M
Mandatory DPO with public disclosure for controllers
ANPD-approved SCCs required for cross-border transfers by 2025

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in planning and operations
Configuration management and traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention
Human factors in root cause analysis
Maintenance release and product safety requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

The Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's landmark comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021, it governs personal data processing with extraterritorial scope for any targeting Brazilian residents. LGPD employs a risk-based, accountability-driven approach, mirroring GDPR but with Brazilian adaptations like 10 principles.

Key Components

**10 core principlespurpose limitation, adequacy, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
**Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization, objection to automated decisions.
**10 legal basesconsent, contracts, legitimate interests, sensitive data restrictions.
**Governance toolsmandatory DPO for controllers, Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs), DPIAs for high-risk processing.
**ANPD enforcementgraduated sanctions up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap), 3-day breach notifications.

Why Organizations Use It

LGPD ensures legal compliance amid rising fines and audits, mitigates breach risks in Brazil's digital economy, and builds stakeholder trust. It offers competitive advantages through innovation exemptions like anonymization, secure transfers via SCCs, and market access for global firms.

Implementation Overview

Adopt phased risk-based methodology: governance setup, data mapping/RoPAs, policy design, technical controls, DSR/incident processes, monitoring. Applies universally to public/private entities processing Brazilian data, regardless of size; no certification but ANPD audits required. (178 words)

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an internationally recognized quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance organizations (MROs), repair stations, and continuing airworthiness providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based thinking approach and Annex SL high-level structure across Clauses 4–10.

Key Components

Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, product safety.
Follows PDCA cycle; no fixed number of controls but requires documented information for all applicable clauses.
Certification via IAQG OASIS database.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures regulatory compliance (FAA/EASA), customer satisfaction, and airworthiness.
Mitigates safety risks, enables market access to OEMs/contracts.
Drives operational efficiency, on-time delivery, continual improvement.
Builds stakeholder trust through auditable evidence.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs globally; requires internal audits, management reviews before Stage 2 audit.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	AS9110C
Scope	Personal data protection and processing	Aerospace maintenance quality management
Industry	All sectors targeting Brazilian residents	Aviation MRO organizations worldwide
Nature	Mandatory data protection law/regulation	Voluntary QMS certification standard
Testing	ANPD audits and DPIAs for high-risk	Internal/external certification audits
Penalties	Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue	Loss of certification, no legal fines

Scope

LGPD

Personal data protection and processing

AS9110C

Aerospace maintenance quality management

Industry

LGPD

All sectors targeting Brazilian residents

AS9110C

Aviation MRO organizations worldwide

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory data protection law/regulation

AS9110C

Voluntary QMS certification standard

Testing

LGPD

ANPD audits and DPIAs for high-risk

AS9110C

Internal/external certification audits

Penalties

LGPD

Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue

AS9110C

Loss of certification, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and AS9110C

LGPD FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs Six Sigma

ISO 27001 vs Six Sigma: Compare info security management standards for compliance & resilience against process excellence for efficiency. Discover key differences, benefits & integration tips now!

DORA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Compare DORA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: EU finance resilience meets U.S. disclosure mandates. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & governance insights for global firms now.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs GMP

Discover CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs GMP: Master data localization, network security & compliance strategies to transform obligations into strategic wins. Essential guide!

LGPD

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs Six Sigma

DORA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs GMP