What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is to protect the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of natural persons through comprehensive regulation of personal data processing.** Enacted August 14, 2018, it unifies fragmented norms, mandating 10 core principles (Art. 6)—including purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, and accountability—for controllers and processors handling identified/identifiable natural persons' data.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and processors handling personal data in Brazil, targeting Brazilian residents, or collected therein must comply with LGPD, regardless of organization size or location (Art. 3).** This extraterritorial scope applies to public/private entities in sectors like e-commerce, fintech, healthcare, and cloud services; no employee/revenue thresholds exempt micro/small firms processing personal or sensitive data (e.g., health, biometrics).

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification, but ANPD may conduct audits and requires controllers to maintain processing records and DPIAs for high-risk activities (Arts. 37-38).** Voluntary certifications enhance compliance demonstration; processors must follow controller instructions with security measures, subject to ANPD enforcement.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD assessments, including Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs) and DPIAs for high-risk processing, must be maintained continuously and updated as needed, with annual internal reviews recommended (Art. 37).** ANPD demands on-request DPIAs; incident logs retain 5 years per Resolution CD/ANPD No. 15/2024.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD incurs graduated ANPD sanctions, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction), data processing suspension up to 6 months, and publicity of violations (Art. 52).** Factors like gravity, cooperation, and safeguards influence penalties; civil claims for damages also apply (Art. 42).

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD maps closely to international frameworks due to shared principles like purpose limitation, transparency, minimization, and data subject rights, facilitating hybrid compliance programs.** ANPD regulations (e.g., No. 19/2024 on transfers) align with mechanisms like SCCs, though no adequacy decisions exist yet.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step to implement LGPD is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) for controllers and conducting comprehensive data mapping to create a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA) (Arts. 41, 37).** Publish DPO details publicly; prioritize identifying data flows, legal bases, and high-risk processing.

What is the primary objective of **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The primary objective of the Australian Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is to regulate the handling of personal information by Australian Government agencies and eligible private sector organisations to promote and protect individual privacy while facilitating transborder information flows.** This is achieved through the **13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)**, which govern collection, use, disclosure, security (**APP 11**), and individual rights across the data lifecycle. The **Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme** (Part IIIC, from 22 February 2018) enforces transparency for breaches likely to cause **serious harm**.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The Australian Privacy Act applies to all Australian Government agencies and private sector/not-for-profit organisations with annual turnover exceeding AU$3 million, plus specific small business operators (SBOs) in defined cases.** SBOs (turnover ≤ AU$3 million) must comply if they provide **health services**, **trade in personal information**, hold **Consumer Data Right** accreditation, provide **Digital ID Act 2024** accredited services, handle **TFNs**, or opt-in under s 6EA. It has extraterritorial reach via the **Australian link** for foreign entities handling Australians’ data.

Does **Australian Privacy Act** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, the Australian Privacy Act does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **OAIC** conducts voluntary privacy assessments and commissioner-initiated investigations, but compliance relies on entities demonstrating **reasonable steps** under the **APPs** (e.g., **APP 11** security). Entities may pursue ISO 27701 for assurance, but it is not required.

How often should an assessment for **Australian Privacy Act** be performed?

**Assessments for Australian Privacy Act compliance should be performed regularly as part of ongoing risk management, with no fixed statutory frequency.** **OAIC** expects periodic reviews scaled to context (e.g., annually for high-risk entities), triggered by changes like acquisitions, new systems, or incidents. **NDB** assessments occur immediately for potential eligible breaches (s 26WH: reasonable and expeditious within 30 days).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **Australian Privacy Act**?

**Non-compliance with the Australian Privacy Act can result in civil penalties up to AU$50 million or 30% of adjusted annual turnover (whichever is greater) for serious or repeated interferences.** The **OAIC** may issue investigations, enforceable undertakings, infringement notices, or court proceedings (e.g., s 13G). **NDB** failures (s 26WK) attract separate penalties; reputational damage and remediation orders follow.

Can **Australian Privacy Act** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, the Australian Privacy Act’s APPs can be mapped to other international frameworks, though no formal equivalence exists.** **APP 8** (cross-border) aligns with adequacy mechanisms; **APP 11** security maps to ISO 27001/27701. **OAIC** guidance supports interoperability, but entities must address gaps (e.g., no controller/processor distinction).

What is the first step to begin implementing **Australian Privacy Act**?

**The first step to implement the Australian Privacy Act is to conduct a coverage and data mapping assessment to confirm APP entity status and inventory personal information flows.** Identify turnover, SBO exceptions (e.g., health/TFN), **Australian link**, and high-risk holdings (**APP 11**, cross-border **APP 8**), per **OAIC** guidance.

LGPD vs Australian Privacy Act

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection

Australian Privacy Act

Mandatory

1988

Australia's federal regulation for personal information protection

Quick Verdict

LGPD mandates comprehensive data protection for Brazilian residents with 10 principles and ANPD enforcement, while Australian Privacy Act's 13 APPs require reasonable steps for Aussie-linked entities under OAIC oversight. Companies adopt them for legal compliance, fines avoidance, and market trust.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Brazil's General Data Protection Law (LGPD, Law 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targets Brazilian residents' data processing
10 core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped at R$50M
Mandatory DPO appointment with public disclosure for controllers
3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD and subjects

Data Privacy

Australian Privacy Act

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) for data lifecycle
Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme for serious harms
Cross-border disclosure accountability under APP 8
Security and retention via reasonable steps (APP 11)
OAIC enforcement with multimillion penalties

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021, it safeguards personal data of Brazilian residents with extraterritorial scope. Its risk-based approach mandates principles like purpose limitation and accountability for all processing.

Key Components

**10 core principlesPurpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
**Data subject rightsAccess, correction, deletion, portability, objection to automated decisions.
**Legal bases10 options including consent, legitimate interests, contracts.
**GovernanceMandatory DPO for controllers, records of processing, DPIAs for high-risk activities.
**EnforcementANPD imposes graduated sanctions up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap).

Why Organizations Use It

LGPD compliance avoids multimillion fines, operational halts, reputational damage. It builds trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy, supports AI innovation via anonymization exemptions, and aligns with GDPR for multinationals.

Implementation Overview

Phased risk-based methodology: governance setup, data mapping, policies, controls, DSR/incident processes, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries processing Brazilian data; no certification but ANPD audits required.

Australian Privacy Act Details

What It Is

The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's foundational federal regulation governing personal information handling. It establishes economy-wide privacy standards via the 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), using a principles-based, contextual 'reasonable steps' approach balancing individual rights with data flows. Scope includes government agencies, private entities over AU$3M turnover, certain small businesses, and those with an Australian link.

Key Components

**13 APPsCover transparency (APP 1), collection/use/disclosure (APPs 3-8), quality/security (APPs 10-11), and access/correction (APPs 12-13).
**NDB schemeMandatory breach notifications for serious harm.
**Special regimesCredit reporting, TFNs.
**OAIC enforcementAudits, penalties up to AU$50M/30% turnover; no certification required.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance for in-scope entities avoids severe fines.
Enhances risk management, security (APP 11), cross-border accountability (APP 8).
Builds trust, enables data-driven innovation, reduces breach impacts.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy/design, controls/training, NDB readiness, audits.
Applies broadly; scales by size/sensitivity; ongoing governance essential.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	Australian Privacy Act
Scope	Personal data processing, 10 principles, data subject rights	Personal info handling via 13 APPs, security, cross-border
Industry	All sectors, Brazil residents, extraterritorial	All sectors >$3M turnover, Australian link, health/credit
Nature	Mandatory law, ANPD enforcement, graduated sanctions	Mandatory principles, OAIC enforcement, civil penalties
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits on demand	Reasonable steps security, PIAs recommended, OAIC assessments
Penalties	2% Brazilian revenue, max R$50M per infraction	Up to AUD50M or 30% turnover, court penalties

Scope

LGPD

Personal data processing, 10 principles, data subject rights

Australian Privacy Act

Personal info handling via 13 APPs, security, cross-border

Industry

LGPD

All sectors, Brazil residents, extraterritorial

Australian Privacy Act

All sectors >$3M turnover, Australian link, health/credit

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory law, ANPD enforcement, graduated sanctions

Australian Privacy Act

Mandatory principles, OAIC enforcement, civil penalties

Testing

LGPD

DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits on demand

Australian Privacy Act

Reasonable steps security, PIAs recommended, OAIC assessments

Penalties

LGPD

2% Brazilian revenue, max R$50M per infraction

Australian Privacy Act

Up to AUD50M or 30% turnover, court penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and Australian Privacy Act

LGPD FAQ

Australian Privacy Act FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIS2 vs EU AI Act

Discover NIS2 vs EU AI Act: NIS2 expands cyber scope, mandates 24/72hr reports & 2% fines; AI Act bans high-risk AI, phases GPAI rules. Compare & comply now!

GMP vs CAA

Discover GMP vs CAA: Pharma quality standards vs Clean Air Act emissions rules. Unlock key differences, compliance strategies & risk mitigation for seamless operations. Dive in!

BREEAM vs ISO 41001

Compare BREEAM vs ISO 41001: BREEAM rates building sustainability (energy, health, ecology) for certifications like Outstanding. ISO 41001 governs FM systems via PDCA for efficiency. Choose wisely—read now!

LGPD

Australian Privacy Act

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

Australian Privacy Act

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Australian Privacy Act Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

Australian Privacy Act FAQ

What is the primary objective of Australian Privacy Act?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with Australian Privacy Act?

Does Australian Privacy Act require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for Australian Privacy Act be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with Australian Privacy Act?

Can Australian Privacy Act be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing Australian Privacy Act?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIS2 vs EU AI Act

GMP vs CAA

BREEAM vs ISO 41001