What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD is to protect the fundamental rights of natural persons regarding personal data processing through a comprehensive framework of principles, rights, and obligations.** Enacted as Law No. 13.709/2018 on August 14, 2018, LGPD unifies prior fragmented regulations, mandating 10 core principles under Article 6—including purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, and accountability—to ensure ethical handling of personal data (Art. 5, I) and sensitive data (Art. 5, II) like health or biometrics.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and processors handling personal data of Brazilian residents must comply with LGPD, regardless of company size or location.** Its extraterritorial scope (Art. 3) applies to any processing in Brazil, targeting Brazilian residents for goods/services, or data collected there, capturing global entities in sectors like e-commerce, fintech, and healthcare. No employee/revenue thresholds exist; even micro-enterprises qualify if processing covered data.

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD)** conducts audits under Arts. 55-56, while controllers must maintain Records of Processing Activities (Art. 37, simplified for small entities per CD/ANPD No. 02/2022) and perform Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing (Art. 38). Voluntary certifications enhance compliance demonstration.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD assessments, including Records of Processing Activities and DPIAs, must be maintained continuously and updated for changes in high-risk processing.** ANPD requires ongoing monitoring (e.g., Resolution CD/ANPD No. 15/2024 for incidents), with internal audits recommended quarterly/annually. No fixed frequency is prescribed, but revisions are triggered by new processing, breaches, or ANPD guidance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD incurs graduated administrative sanctions by ANPD, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction).** Nine sanctions (Art. 52) range from warnings and publicity to daily fines, data blocking/deletion, and activity suspension (up to 6 months, extendable). Factors include gravity, cooperation, and safeguards; civil claims for damages (Art. 42) add liability.

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD can be mapped to other international frameworks due to shared principles like purpose limitation and data subject rights.** Its 10 principles (Art. 6) and rights (Art. 18) align closely with global regimes, facilitating hybrid programs—though ANPD-specific elements like revenue-based fines (2% Brazilian vs. global) and SCC mandates (Resolution No. 19/2024) require tailored adaptations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step to implement LGPD is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and conducting a comprehensive data mapping to create a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA).** Per Art. 41, controllers must designate a DPO (publicly disclosed, exemptions limited), followed by inventorying data flows, purposes, legal bases (Art. 7), and risks to enforce principles (Art. 6) and enable governance.

What is the primary objective of **SOX**?

**The primary objective of SOX is to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures under federal securities laws.** Enacted July 30, 2002, following scandals like Enron and WorldCom, it mandates CEO/CFO certifications (**Section 302**), management assessment of **internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR)** (**Section 404**), auditor independence (**Title II**), and PCAOB oversight (**Title I**) to prevent fraud and ensure transparent financial reporting.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOX**?

**SOX applies to all U.S.-listed public companies, including foreign private issuers, and their PCAOB-registered auditors.** Section 404(a) requires management assessment of ICFR for issuers under Securities Exchange Act Sections 12 or 15(d); Section 404(b) mandates auditor attestation except for non-accelerated filers (public float under $75 million) and Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs, up to 5 years post-IPO unless revenues exceed $1.235 billion). Private firms comply indirectly for IPO/M&A readiness.

Does **SOX** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOX Section 404(b) requires external auditor attestation on management's ICFR assessment for applicable issuers, per PCAOB standards like AS 2201.** Non-accelerated filers and EGCs are exempt from 404(b) but must perform 404(a) management assessments. Auditors attest annually in Form 10-K, testing design and operating effectiveness.

How often should an assessment for **SOX** be performed?

**SOX requires annual management assessment of ICFR effectiveness under Section 404(a), reported in Form 10-K.** Quarterly CEO/CFO certifications under Section 302 evaluate disclosure controls. Mature programs conduct continuous monitoring, interim testing mid-year, and year-end validation to support attestations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOX**?

**Non-compliance with SOX triggers civil penalties, criminal fines up to $5 million, and imprisonment up to 20 years for willful false certifications (Section 906) or document tampering (Section 802).** SEC enforcement, PCAOB sanctions, restatements, delisting, investor lawsuits, and higher capital costs follow material weaknesses or adverse ICFR opinions.

Can **SOX** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOX ICFR requirements map directly to COSO's five components: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information/communication, and monitoring.** This alignment supports top-down risk assessments, key control rationalization, and ITGC integration, enabling efficiency without prescribing a specific framework.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOX**?

**The first step is a top-down risk assessment to scope material financial statement accounts, assertions, processes, and systems per PCAOB AS 2201.** Form a steering committee, define materiality thresholds (e.g., 5% of assets), map risks to controls using risk-control matrices, and document entity-level controls to establish program governance.

LGPD vs SOX | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection

SOX

Mandatory

2002

U.S. regulation for internal controls over financial reporting.

Quick Verdict

LGPD governs personal data protection for Brazilian residents globally, mandating consent and breach notifications. SOX enforces financial reporting integrity for U.S. public firms via ICFR assessments. Companies adopt LGPD for privacy compliance, SOX for investor trust and governance.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law No. 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targets Brazilian residents globally
10 core principles include prevention and non-discrimination
Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped at R$50M
Mandatory DPO for controllers with public disclosure
SCCs required for cross-border transfers by 2025

Financial Reporting

SOX

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandates CEO/CFO certification of financial reports (Section 302)
Requires management ICFR assessment (Section 404(a))
Demands external auditor ICFR attestation (Section 404(b))
Creates PCAOB for audit firm oversight (Title I)
Enforces auditor independence and rotation (Title II)

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. Enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021, it safeguards personal data of Brazilian residents with extraterritorial scope. Its risk-based approach mandates principles like purpose limitation and accountability for controllers and processors.

Key Components

**10 core principlesPurpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
10 legal bases for processing, including consent and legitimate interests.
**Data subject rightsAccess, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization.
**GovernanceMandatory DPO for controllers, DPIAs for high-risk processing, RoPAs.
Enforcement by ANPD with graduated sanctions up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap).

Why Organizations Use It

LGPD compliance avoids multimillion fines, operational halts, and reputational damage. It builds stakeholder trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy, and supports innovation via anonymization exemptions. Strategic benefits include efficient data governance and competitive differentiation.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance setup, data mapping, policies, controls, training, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries processing Brazilian data globally. No certification, but ANPD audits and vendor SCCs required.

SOX Details

What It Is

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted post-Enron scandals to protect investors via accurate corporate disclosures. It mandates internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) using a risk-based approach with COSO framework.

Key Components

**Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive accountability (Titles III-IV).
Core sections: 302 (CEO/CFO certifications), 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures).
Built on COSO principles; no fixed controls, focuses on key risks.
Compliance via annual management reports and auditor opinions.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for U.S. public companies; reduces restatements, builds investor trust.
Enhances governance, fraud deterrence, operational efficiency.
Lowers cost of capital; aids M&A/IPO readiness.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, monitoring.
Applies to public issuers; scaled for size (exemptions for smaller filers).
Requires annual audits; ongoing continuous monitoring recommended.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	SOX
Scope	Personal data processing and privacy rights	Financial reporting and internal controls
Industry	All sectors, Brazil-targeted processing	U.S. public companies, all sectors
Nature	Mandatory data protection regulation	Mandatory corporate governance law
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits	Annual ICFR testing, PCAOB audits
Penalties	2% Brazilian revenue, R$50M cap	Criminal fines, imprisonment, SEC fines

Scope

LGPD

Personal data processing and privacy rights

SOX

Financial reporting and internal controls

Industry

LGPD

All sectors, Brazil-targeted processing

SOX

U.S. public companies, all sectors

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory data protection regulation

SOX

Mandatory corporate governance law

Testing

LGPD

DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits

SOX

Annual ICFR testing, PCAOB audits

Penalties

LGPD

2% Brazilian revenue, R$50M cap

SOX

Criminal fines, imprisonment, SEC fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and SOX

LGPD FAQ

SOX FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 21001 vs NERC CIP

ISO 21001 vs NERC CIP: Compare learner-centric ed management systems with grid cybersecurity standards. Key differences, implementation tips & compliance strategies for excellence. Dive in!

ISO 45001 vs TOGAF

ISO 45001 vs TOGAF: Compare OH&S safety standard with enterprise architecture framework. Uncover PDCA/ADM cycles, leadership, risk mgmt & IMS integration benefits!

ISO 9001 vs SAMA CSF

Compare ISO 9001 vs SAMA CSF: Quality excellence meets cyber resilience for Saudi finance. Uncover differences, benefits & strategies to elevate compliance now.

LGPD

SOX

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

SOX

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOX Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

SOX FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOX?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOX?

Does SOX require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOX be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOX?

Can SOX be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOX?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 21001 vs NERC CIP

ISO 45001 vs TOGAF

ISO 9001 vs SAMA CSF