What is the primary objective of MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

**MLPS 2.0 ensures security controls match potential harm from system compromise to national security, social order, and public interests.** It classifies systems into five levels, mandating commensurate technical, management, and governance measures for all network operators in China per GB/T 22239-2019 standards.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

**Virtually all network operators in mainland China must comply with MLPS 2.0.** This includes domestic firms, foreign enterprises with local operations, cloud providers, and critical infrastructure handling IT, OT, IoT, or big data systems, enforced under the Cybersecurity Law.

Does MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, Level 2+ systems require mandatory third-party audits by licensed Chinese firms.** Audits score ≥75/100 across technical/management controls, followed by PSB review and certification; Level 1 relies on self-assessment.

How often should an assessment for MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) be performed?

**Assessments occur biennially for Level 2, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5.** Re-evaluations are also triggered by major system changes, with ongoing self-inspections required.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

**Non-compliance triggers fines up to 100,000 yuan, operational suspensions, intensified inspections, and license denial.** PSBs enforce via on-site checks; severe cases link to broader sanctions under Cybersecurity Law.

Can MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 maps to ISO 27001 and NIST CSF control domains.** Organizational, physical, technical controls align; organizations extend global ISMS with China-specific grading, audits, data localization.

What is the first step to begin implementing MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)?

**Conduct impact-based self-classification of systems into five protection levels.** Inventory assets, assess harm to security/social interests, document rationale, then file with local PSB for Level 2+ validation.

What is the primary objective of **23 NYCRR 500**?

**23 NYCRR 500 aims to protect nonpublic information and ensure operational integrity of information systems for NYDFS-regulated financial entities.** It mandates risk-based cybersecurity programs, governance, technical controls like MFA and encryption, and rapid incident reporting to safeguard against cyber threats from nation-states, terrorists, and criminals, as outlined in the regulation's preamble.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **23 NYCRR 500**?

****23 NYCRR 500 applies to all Covered Entities licensed, registered, or operating under NY Banking, Insurance, or Financial Services Law.** This includes state-chartered banks, insurers, mortgage brokers, virtual currency licensees, HMOs, and NY branches of foreign banks handling nonpublic information (NPI). Limited exemptions exist for small entities with fewer than 10 employees, under $5M NY revenue, or under $10M assets, but core obligations like risk assessments remain.

Does **23 NYCRR 500** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, 23 NYCRR 500 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for most entities, but Class A companies must undergo independent audits.** Compliance relies on annual CISO/CEO certifications, 5-year documentation retention, and NYDFS examinations. Enhanced monitoring, EDR, and PAM are required for Class A (>$20M NY revenue plus >2,000 employees or >$1B global revenue).

How often should an assessment for **23 NYCRR 500** be performed?

**Risk assessments under 23 NYCRR 500 must be performed annually and updated upon material changes.** Section 500.9 requires documented, periodic evaluations of threats, vulnerabilities, and controls, integrated with enterprise risk management. Penetration testing is annual, vulnerability assessments bi-annual (or continuous), with policy approvals and CISO reports to the board at least annually.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **23 NYCRR 500**?

**Non-compliance with 23 NYCRR 500 results in civil monetary penalties, consent orders, and remediation mandates from NYDFS.** Enforcement includes multimillion-dollar fines, e.g., $30M against Robinhood Crypto, $4.25M against OneMain Financial. Violations trigger license actions, reputational damage, and heightened scrutiny, with penalties scaling to $75,000 per day for reckless acts.

An **23 NYCRR 500** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, 23 NYCRR 500 maps closely to NIST CSF, CRI Profile, and ISO 27001.** NYDFS accepts frameworks like NIST for risk assessments, with alignments in governance, asset management, MFA, encryption, incident response, and third-party risk. This enables integrated compliance for cross-jurisdictional operations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **23 NYCRR 500**?

**The first step for 23 NYCRR 500 implementation is determining Covered Entity status and appointing a qualified CISO.** Use NYDFS exemption flowchart, then establish governance with board access, conduct initial risk assessment on critical assets/TPSPs, and build an evidence repository for 5-year retention to support annual April 15 certification.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs 23 NYCRR 500

Standards Comparison

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

2019

China's mandatory graded cybersecurity regime for networks

23 NYCRR 500

Mandatory

2017

NY regulation for financial cybersecurity programs

Quick Verdict

MLPS 2.0 mandates graded protection for all China networks via PSB oversight, while 23 NYCRR 500 requires risk-based programs for NY financial firms with annual certifications. Companies adopt them for legal compliance and cyber resilience in respective jurisdictions.

Cybersecurity

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five-level classification based on societal impact harm
Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
Third-party audits requiring 75/100 score minimum
Extended controls for cloud IoT ICS big data
Law enforcement oversight with on-site inspections

Financial Services

23 NYCRR 500

23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Annual CISO/CEO dual-signature compliance certification
72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
Third-party service provider security policy and oversight
Risk-based annual penetration testing and vulnerability management

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally enforceable cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It mandates classification of information systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, applying graded technical, organizational, and governance controls to all network operators.

Key Components

Common controls in physical security, network protection, data security, operations monitoring.
Level-specific baselines via GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 standards.
Extended requirements for cloud, IoT, big data, industrial controls.
Governance structures, personnel vetting, incident response; compliance via third-party audits (≥75/100 score) and PSB approval.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for China operations, avoiding fines (up to 100,000 yuan), suspensions, inspections.
Builds resilience, enables market access, aligns with data laws; differentiates in procurement.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: scoping, self-classification, gap analysis, remediation, external audits, PSB filing, ongoing re-evaluations. Targets all mainland China network operators; Level 3+ demands annual audits, high costs for multinationals.

23 NYCRR 500 Details

What It Is

23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate for financial services entities. It establishes minimum risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems' confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The approach emphasizes governance, evidence-based outcomes, and prescriptive controls like MFA and incident reporting.

Key Components

14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO oversight, risk assessments, MFA, encryption, penetration testing, TPSP management, and 72-hour incident notification.
Built on risk assessment-centric architecture with annual certifications by CISO/CEO.
Compliance model involves self-attestation, documentation retention for 5 years, and NYDFS examinations; Class A companies require enhanced audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for NY-licensed financial entities to avoid multimillion-dollar fines and consent orders.
Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust, and aligns with NIST CSF.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: governance setup, risk assessment, technical controls (MFA/PAM), TPSP contracts, testing.
Targets financial services in NY; scalable by size/complexity; no third-party certification but evidentiary audits.