MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs CIS Controls
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme
CIS Controls
Prioritized cybersecurity framework of 18 defensive controls
Quick Verdict
MLPS 2.0 mandates graded protection for China networks via audits and PSB enforcement, while CIS Controls offer voluntary global best practices for hygiene. Chinese firms comply with MLPS legally; global orgs adopt CIS for resilience.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)
Key Features
- Five-level impact-based system classification
- Mandatory under Cybersecurity Law for all networks
- Enforced by Public Security Bureaus inspections
- Graded technical and governance controls by level
- Third-party audits required for Level 2+ systems
CIS Controls
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
- Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS
- Free CIS Benchmarks for secure configurations
- Asset inventory and continuous vulnerability management focus
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on compromise impact to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, governance, and physical controls.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, personnel management.
- Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
- Common controls for all levels; extended for cloud, IoT, big data.
- Compliance via self-classification, third-party audits (Level 2+), PSB approval.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for all China-based networks; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
- Enhances resilience, supports market access, aligns with data laws.
- Builds regulator trust, reduces breach risks.
Implementation Overview
Phased: inventory/classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit/file with PSBs. Applies to all sizes/industries in China; ongoing re-evaluations required. (178 words)
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1 is a community-driven cybersecurity framework of prioritized, actionable best practices. It reduces attack surfaces and enhances resilience across hybrid environments via 18 controls and 153 safeguards, structured by Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3) for risk-based adoption.
Key Components
- 18 controls spanning asset management, access control, vulnerability management, monitoring, incident response, and penetration testing.
- IG1 (56 safeguards) for basic hygiene; IG2/IG3 for advanced maturity.
- Built on real-world attack data; includes free CIS Benchmarks for configurations.
- No formal certification; self-assessed compliance with mappings to NIST, ISO 27001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates 85% of common attacks, cuts breach costs, accelerates compliance (NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA).
- Builds trust with insurers, partners; enables efficiency via automation.
- Scalable for SMBs to enterprises across industries.
Implementation Overview
Phased roadmap: governance, discovery, foundational controls (IG1), expansion (IG2/IG3), validation. Applies universally; uses tools like Controls Navigator for metrics and audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Graded protection for all networks/systems in China | Prioritized cybersecurity best practices globally |
| Industry | All sectors in mainland China only | All industries worldwide, any size |
| Nature | Mandatory regulation enforced by police | Voluntary best-practice framework |
| Testing | Mandatory third-party audits, PSB approval | Self-assessments, optional audits |
| Penalties | Fines, license suspension, operations halt | No legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and CIS Controls
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and CIS Controls compare against other standards