What is the primary objective of **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The primary objective of MLPS 2.0 is to establish a graded cybersecurity protection system ensuring controls match the potential harm from system compromise to national security, social order, and public interests.** It classifies systems into five levels (1-5) based on impact severity, mandating technical, management, physical, and personnel controls via standards like GB/T 22239-2019, with common baselines for all levels and extensions for cloud, IoT, and big data.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**All network operators in mainland China must comply with MLPS 2.0 under Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law.** This includes domestic enterprises, foreign-invested firms with local operations, cloud providers, and critical infrastructure in sectors like finance, energy, and telecom. Virtually any entity operating IT networks, mobile apps, IoT, or big data platforms qualifies, with Levels 2+ requiring PSB filing.

Does **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 mandates external security reviews by licensed Chinese firms for Level 2+ systems, targeting a minimum score of 75/100.** PSBs approve classifications and issue certifications post-review, involving technical testing, documentation checks, and on-site inspections. Level 1 requires only self-assessment; higher levels demand recurring evaluations.

How often should an assessment for **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be performed?

**MLPS 2.0 requires periodic re-evaluations scaling by level: biennially for Level 2, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5.** Reassessments are also triggered by major changes like system upgrades or cloud migrations, including self-inspections and third-party audits for Level 2+.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**Non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 risks fines up to 100,000 yuan, operational suspensions, system shutdowns, and intensified PSB inspections.** Enforcement ties certification to business license renewals; severe cases in critical sectors have led to multimillion-yuan penalties and blacklisting, as seen in banking and hacking incidents.

An **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 control domains—physical, network, data, operations, governance—map to frameworks like ISO 27001 Annex A and NIST CSF.** Organizations leverage existing ISMS Statements of Applicability for gap analysis, though MLPS adds prescriptive grading, PSB oversight, and data localization unique to China.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The first step is conducting a provisional self-assessment to classify systems into Levels 1-5 based on impact to national security, social order, and public interests.** Inventory assets, evaluate harm severity per GB/T 22240-2020, document rationale, and prepare for Level 2+ PSB filing within 30 days of system commissioning.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 41001**?

**ISO 41001:2018 specifies requirements for a facility management (FM) system to demonstrate effective and efficient FM delivery that supports the demand organization’s objectives, consistently meets interested parties’ needs and applicable requirements, and aims for sustainability in a globally competitive environment (Clause 1).** This PDCA-based standard, using the High-Level Structure, elevates FM from operational services to a strategic capability, integrating people, processes, and assets across in-house, outsourced, or hybrid models.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 41001**?

**ISO 41001 is voluntary and non-sector-specific, applicable to all organizations or parts thereof—public or private, any size, type, or geography—delivering FM services (Clause 1).** It targets FM organizations (in-house teams or providers) accountable for the FM system, distinguishing them from the demand organization. Professional drivers include tenders requiring certification, contractual SLAs, ESG reporting, and risk mitigation for asset-intensive sectors like healthcare, manufacturing, and real estate.

Oes **ISO 41001** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 41001 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification, offering pathways like self-declaration, external confirmation, or accredited certification (Introduction).** Certification involves Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site verification), followed by annual surveillance and triennial recertification, providing market differentiation and audit efficiency when integrated with other HLS standards.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 41001** be performed?

**ISO 41001 requires ongoing performance evaluation through monitoring, internal audits at planned intervals, and management reviews at predetermined times (Clauses 9.1–9.3).** Internal audits follow a scheduled program (e.g., annual full coverage), management reviews occur at least annually or biannually for complex portfolios, with continual improvement via corrective actions (Clause 10). Amendment 1:2024 emphasizes periodic climate risk reassessments.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 41001**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 41001 carries no direct legal penalties as it is voluntary, but it exposes organizations to operational risks like regulatory fines, contractual breaches, downtime, higher insurance premiums, and reputational damage.** Certification lapses lead to surveillance failures or decertification; poor FM governance risks asset failures, safety incidents, and missed ESG targets, amplifying costs in critical sectors.

An **ISO 41001** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 41001’s High-Level Structure and PDCA cycle enable seamless mapping and integration with other ISO management system standards like ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, and ISO 22301.** Common elements include leadership (Clause 5), risk planning (Clause 6), and performance evaluation (Clause 9), facilitating a single integrated management system (IMS) with shared audits, policies, and evidence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 41001**?

**The first step is determining the organization’s context, documenting external/internal issues, identifying interested parties and their requirements, and defining the FM system scope as documented information (Clauses 4.1–4.3).** Conduct a clause-aligned gap analysis to establish boundaries, considering FM-delivery models and interactions, forming the foundation for leadership commitment and planning.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 41001

Standards Comparison

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

2019

China's mandatory multi-level cybersecurity protection scheme

ISO 41001

Voluntary

2018

International standard for facility management systems

Quick Verdict

MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China's networks via PSB enforcement, while ISO 41001 offers voluntary FM certification globally. Companies adopt MLPS for legal compliance; ISO 41001 for efficiency, sustainability, and stakeholder trust.

Cybersecurity

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five-level impact-based system classification model
Mandatory PSB registration and approval for Level 2+
Third-party audits requiring 75/100 minimum score
Extended controls for cloud, IoT, and ICS
Law enforcement-led inspections and enforcement

Facility Management

ISO 41001

ISO 41001:2018 Facility management — Management systems — Requirements

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Distinguishes FM organization from demand organization
HLS alignment enables integrated management systems
Risk-based planning includes business continuity
Stakeholder requirements lifecycle management
Service integration and operational coordination

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires all network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, management, and physical controls.

Key Components

Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
Level 2+ mandates third-party audits (75/100 score), PSB approval; extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS.
Compliance model: self-classification, expert review, ongoing re-evaluations.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for China operations to avoid fines, suspensions, inspections.
Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws; enables market access.
Builds regulator trust, reduces breach risks.

Implementation Overview

Phased: inventory/classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit/file with PSBs. Applies to all sizes in China; Level 3+ annual audits. Costs tens of thousands USD yearly for mid-level systems.

ISO 41001 Details

What It Is

ISO 41001:2018 — Facility management — Management systems — Requirements with guidance for use — is a certifiable international management system standard for facility management (FM). Its primary purpose is to ensure effective, efficient FM delivery supporting the demand organization's objectives, stakeholder needs, and sustainability. It uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with ISO's High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

Core clauses: Context (4), Leadership (5), Planning (6), Support (7), Operation (8), Performance evaluation (9), Improvement (10).
FM-specific elements: stakeholder requirements lifecycle, service integration, demand organization alignment.
Built on HLS for interoperability; no fixed control count, focuses on processes.
Certification via accredited third-party audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Strategic alignment elevates FM to executive capability.
Reduces costs, risks (continuity, emergencies), improves wellbeing.
Meets contractual, ESG demands; enhances competitiveness.
Builds trust through measurable performance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, processes, audits.
Applies universally (size, sector, geography).
Involves training, digital tools (CMMS), internal audits, management reviews.