GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ITIL
    Standards Comparison

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ITIL

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    2019

    China's mandatory graded protection cybersecurity framework

    VS

    ITIL

    Voluntary
    2019

    Global framework for IT service management best practices.

    Quick Verdict

    MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China networks, enforced by PSBs with fines. ITIL provides voluntary ITSM best practices globally for service efficiency. Chinese operators comply with MLPS legally; worldwide firms adopt ITIL for optimized operations.

    Cybersecurity

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based system classification
    • Mandatory registration with Public Security Bureaus
    • Graded controls for cloud IoT ICS
    • Strict separation of duties requirements
    • Ongoing third-party evaluations oversight
    IT Service Management

    ITIL

    ITIL 4 IT Service Management Framework

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Service Value System (SVS) with 34 flexible practices
    • Seven guiding principles for value-focused decisions
    • Four dimensions of service management
    • Continual improvement model across all elements
    • Integration with DevOps, Agile, and Lean

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation operationalizing Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law. It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical and management controls.

    Key Components

    • Core standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Domains: physical security, network/host protection, data security, monitoring, governance.
    • Extensions for cloud, IoT, big data, ICS.
    • Compliance via self-assessment, expert review (Level 2+), PSB filing, periodic evaluations (75% pass threshold).

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal obligation avoids fines, suspensions; enhances resilience; rationalizes investments; builds trust with regulators, partners. Strategic for China operations, integrates with ISO 27001/NIST.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: inventory/grading, gap analysis, remediation, third-party evaluation, ongoing monitoring. Applies to all China network operators; high complexity for multinationals. Requires local expertise, documentation.

    ITIL Details

    What It Is

    ITIL (formerly Information Technology Infrastructure Library, standalone since 2013) is a best-practices framework for IT Service Management (ITSM). Its primary purpose is aligning IT services with business objectives across the full lifecycle, emphasizing value co-creation. ITIL 4 uses a value-driven methodology through the Service Value System (SVS).

    Key Components

    • Service Value System (SVS): Guiding principles, governance, service value chain (6 activities), 34 practices, continual improvement.
    • 34 Practices: 14 general management, 17 service management (e.g., incident, change), 3 technical management.
    • Seven Guiding Principles: Focus on value, start where you are, progress iteratively, etc.
    • Certification model: PeopleCert-managed, from Foundation to Strategic Leader.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Cost efficiencies, reduced downtime, 87% global adoption.
    • Risk mitigation (e.g., cyber resilience), compliance alignment (ISO 20000).
    • Enhanced customer satisfaction, ROI (up to 38:1).
    • Integrates DevOps/Agile, boosts careers/stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased ten-step roadmap: Assessment, gap analysis, role definition, training, integration.
    • Tailored for all sizes/industries; voluntary, no audits required. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)ITIL
    ScopeCybersecurity graded protection levelsIT service management practices
    IndustryChina network operators all sectorsGlobal IT organizations all sizes
    NatureMandatory Chinese regulation enforcedVoluntary best practices framework
    TestingThird-party evaluations PSB verificationSelf-assessments continual improvement
    PenaltiesFines operational suspensions blacklistingNo legal penalties lost efficiency

    Scope

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Cybersecurity graded protection levels
    ITIL
    IT service management practices

    Industry

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    China network operators all sectors
    ITIL
    Global IT organizations all sizes

    Nature

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory Chinese regulation enforced
    ITIL
    Voluntary best practices framework

    Testing

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party evaluations PSB verification
    ITIL
    Self-assessments continual improvement

    Penalties

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines operational suspensions blacklisting
    ITIL
    No legal penalties lost efficiency

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ITIL

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    ITIL FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe

    The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe

    Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa

    Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

    Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

    Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

    From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

    From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

    Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ITIL compare against other standards

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • DORA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018

    Other ITIL Comparisons

    • NIS2 vs ITIL
    • NIST CSF vs ITIL
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ITIL
    • FedRAMP vs ITIL
    • ISO 27017 vs ITIL
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved