NIS2
EU regulation enhancing cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors
AS9120B
Aerospace QMS standard for distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while AS9120B certifies quality systems for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention. Organizations adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance; AS9120B for supply chain approval.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Expanded scope with size-cap rule for medium/large entities
- Strict multi-stage incident reporting (24/72-hour timelines)
- Direct senior management accountability for compliance
- Fines up to 2% of global annual turnover
- Continuous risk management and supply chain security
AS9120B
AS9120B: Quality Management Systems for Distributors
Key Features
- Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
- Traceability and chain-of-custody for split lots
- Enhanced external provider controls and flowdown
- Configuration management in distribution operations
- Risk-based planning addressing distributor hazards
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common cybersecurity level across member states by bolstering resilience of critical infrastructure and digital services. Applies risk-based, all-hazards approach to essential and important entities.
Key Components
- **Risk managementContinuous assessments, supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
- **Incident reporting24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report.
- **Business continuityCrisis response and recovery plans.
- **Corporate accountabilitySenior management direct responsibility. Aligns with standards like ISO 27001, NIST CSF. Compliance enforced via national authorities, spot checks.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for in-scope entities to avoid fines up to €10M or 2% global turnover. Enhances cyber resilience, ensures service continuity, builds stakeholder trust. Supports multi-state operations amid evolving threats.
Implementation Overview
Conduct gap analysis, implement measures, register with CSIRTs, train staff. Targets medium/large entities in 18 sectors (e.g., energy, transport) across EU. Ongoing supervision, no formal certification but aligns with frameworks. Transposed nationally by October 2024.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aviation, space, and defense distributors. It augments ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure with distributor-specific requirements. Primary purpose: mitigate risks like traceability loss, counterfeit parts, and documentation errors in procurement, storage, splitting, and resale without altering products. Employs risk-based thinking and PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Over 100 aerospace additions to ISO 9001 clauses 4-10.
- Pillars: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, counterfeit prevention, external providers), performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on 10-clause HLS; certification via accredited bodies with OASIS listing.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
- Reduces supply chain risks, builds customer trust via auditable chain-of-custody.
- Enhances efficiency, market access (2,442 global certifications), competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
- Applies to distributors globally; requires internal audits, management review, certification audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, business continuity | Quality management for aerospace parts distribution, traceability |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport | Aerospace distributors globally, aviation/space/defense supply chains |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with national transposition | Voluntary IAQG certification standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Incident reporting timelines, national authority supervision | Third-party audits, internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M | Loss of certification, no direct legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and AS9120B
NIS2 FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs APRA CPS 234
Compare K-PIPA vs APRA CPS 234: Korea's consent-driven privacy law vs Australia's board-led security standard. Uncover 72h breaches, CPOs, testing, fines up to 3% revenue. Master compliance today!
FISMA vs ISO 50001
Compare FISMA cybersecurity vs ISO 50001 energy management: key differences in compliance, risk frameworks & strategies for agencies & orgs. Boost resilience now!
PRINCE2 vs HITRUST CSF
PRINCE2 vs HITRUST CSF: Compare governance-driven project management with certifiable security controls. Uncover principles, processes, maturity scoring & compliance paths. Boost success—read now!