NIS2
EU regulation for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
COBIT
Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors with strict reporting and fines, while COBIT provides voluntary IT governance framework for value creation and risk management. Organizations adopt NIS2 for compliance, COBIT for strategic alignment.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2 Directive)
Key Features
- Implements size-cap rule capturing medium/large entities
- Enforces 24/72-hour multi-stage incident reporting
- Imposes direct accountability on senior management
- Mandates supply chain security and risk management
- Applies fines up to 2% global turnover
COBIT
COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives
Key Features
- 40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
- 11 design factors for tailored governance systems
- Goals cascade aligning stakeholder needs to IT
- CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
- 7 components including processes and culture
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
The NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) is an EU regulation establishing a high common level of cybersecurity across member states. It expands the original NIS Directive's scope to essential and important entities in sectors like energy, transport, and digital infrastructure, using a risk-based, all-hazards approach to enhance resilience.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
- Strict reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report.
- Leverages standards like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF; focuses on supply chain security and continuous measures.
- Compliance via national authorities with spot checks and enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Essential for legal compliance amid transposition by October 2024, avoiding fines up to 2% global turnover. Builds cyber resilience, protects critical services, fosters stakeholder trust, and aids multi-state operations.
Implementation Overview
Applies to medium/large entities (50+ employees, €10M+ turnover) in covered sectors EU-wide. Involves risk assessments, management training, reporting setup, supply chain audits. Tailor to national laws; ongoing supervision without formal certification. (178 words)
COBIT Details
What It Is
COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, is a comprehensive governance and management framework for enterprise IT (EGIT). Its primary purpose is to help organizations create value from IT, manage risk, and optimize resources by aligning stakeholder needs with actionable objectives. It uses a tailored, design-factor-driven approach with 40 objectives across five domains.
Key Components
- **Five domainsEDM (governance), APO, BAI, DSS (management), MEA (assurance).
- 40 governance and management objectives with practices and metrics.
- Six governance system principles and seven components (e.g., processes, structures, culture).
- CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5); no formal certification, but assessments via toolkits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives strategic alignment, risk optimization, and compliance (e.g., SOX, GDPR mappings).
- Enhances auditability, reduces incidents, builds stakeholder trust.
- Provides competitive edge in digital transformation via tailored governance.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachAssess gaps, design via 11 factors, pilot objectives, measure capabilities.
- Involves training, RACI, MEA monitoring; suits all sizes/industries; voluntary with ISACA assessments.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | COBIT |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for critical infrastructure sectors | Enterprise IT governance and management |
| Industry | Essential/important EU entities, size-cap rule | All industries, enterprise-wide IT governance |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement | Voluntary ISACA framework for EGIT |
| Testing | Incident reporting, national authority oversight | Capability assessments, internal audits |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% global turnover | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and COBIT
NIS2 FAQ
COBIT FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PRINCE2 vs SOC 2
PRINCE2 vs SOC 2: Compare structured project governance (7 principles, practices, processes) with security compliance (Trust Services Criteria). Boost delivery & trust—read now!
ISO 45001 vs IEC 62443
Discover ISO 45001 vs IEC 62443: Compare OH&S leadership & PDCA for worker safety with IACS zones, SLs & cybersecurity. Unlock integration for resilient ops now!
CSA vs AS9100
Compare CSA vs AS9100: Key differences in OHS (Z1000/Z1002) vs aerospace QMS standards. Ensure compliance, risk control & safety. Expert insights—choose wisely now!