NIS2
EU directive for high cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
FedRAMP
U.S. program standardizing federal cloud security authorization.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity for EU critical sectors with incident reporting and fines up to 2% turnover, while FedRAMP authorizes US federal cloud providers via NIST controls and continuous monitoring. EU firms comply with NIS2 legally; US vendors pursue FedRAMP for contracts.
NIS2
Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Introduces size-cap rule covering medium/large entities
- Mandates strict 24/72-hour multi-stage incident reporting
- Enforces direct senior management accountability
- Requires continuous risk and supply chain management
- Imposes fines up to 2% global annual turnover
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Key Features
- NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baselines at Low/Moderate/High impact levels
- Assess once, use many times reusability across agencies
- Independent 3PAO security assessments and audits
- Continuous monitoring with monthly/quarterly reporting
- FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSP listings
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
The NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS framework to establish a high common level of cybersecurity resilience across member states. It targets essential and important entities in broadened sectors like energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, and more, using a risk-based approach emphasizing proactive measures, supply chain security, and incident response.
Key Components
- **Risk managementOngoing assessments, access controls, encryption, business continuity plans.
- **Incident reporting24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report.
- **Corporate accountabilityDirect responsibility for senior management.
- **SupervisionNational authorities conduct spot checks and enforce harmonized rules.
No formal certification; compliance via national transposition by October 2024.
Why Organizations Use It
Essential for legal compliance avoiding fines up to €10M or 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats, ensures operational continuity, builds trust, and provides competitive edge in critical sectors through stronger governance and cross-border cooperation.
Implementation Overview
Assess scope by size (50+ employees, €10M turnover) and sector. Implement risk frameworks, reporting processes, training, and supply chain audits. Tailor to national variations; ongoing with real-time evidence for audits. Applies EU-wide to medium/large entities. (178 words)
FedRAMP Details
What It Is
FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide standardized framework for security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud service offerings (CSOs) used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on risk-based NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls mapped to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS).
Key Components
- **Baselines~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls across 20 families.
- Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
- Built on NIST standards, 3PAO assessments, FedRAMP Marketplace.
- Compliance via Agency/Program Authorizations, ongoing monitoring.
Why Organizations Use It
- Unlocks $20M+ federal contracts, CMMC compliance.
- Demonstrates mature security for commercial clients.
- Reduces risk, builds stakeholder trust via reusable authorizations.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Sponsor, preparation, 3PAO assessment, monitoring (12-18 months typical).
- Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal market; high documentation, audits required.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and FedRAMP
NIS2 FAQ
FedRAMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
IEC 62443 vs NIST 800-53
Compare IEC 62443 vs NIST 800-53: OT zones/conduits & SLs vs IT baselines/RMF. Uncover gaps, overlaps & tips for IACS resilience. Boost your cyber strategy now!
GMP vs ISO 41001
Compare GMP vs ISO 41001: Key differences in manufacturing quality controls and facility management systems. Discover compliance strategies, risks, and implementation for optimal operations.
EMAS vs Basel III
Discover EMAS vs Basel III: EU eco-management scheme meets global banking standards. Compare requirements, benefits & strategies for compliance excellence. Dive in!