NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
ISA 95
International standard for enterprise-manufacturing system integration.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors via risk management and reporting, while ISA 95 provides voluntary integration models for global manufacturing ERP-MES interfaces. Companies adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance; ISA 95 for efficient, standardized operations.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2 Directive)
Key Features
- Applies size-cap rule to medium/large entities in covered sectors
- Mandates multi-stage incident reporting within 24/72 hours and 1 month
- Holds senior management directly accountable for compliance
- Imposes fines up to 2% of global annual turnover
- Requires continuous risk management and supply chain security
ISA 95
ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration
Key Features
- Defines Purdue levels 0-4 for system boundaries
- Activity models for manufacturing operations management
- Object models for equipment, materials, personnel
- Standardized Level 3-4 transactions and messaging
- Alias services for identifier mapping across systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation strengthening cybersecurity. It expands the original NIS Directive's scope to essential and important entities across sectors like energy, transport, and digital infrastructure. NIS2 employs a risk-based approach with continuous measures for resilience against cyber threats.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, business continuity, incident reporting, corporate accountability.
- Strict reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, 1-month final report.
- Requirements for supply chain security, access controls, encryption, and training.
- Leverages standards like ISO 27001; focuses on compliance via national audits and spot checks.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures legal compliance to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M.
- Mitigates risks from supply chain attacks and incidents.
- Builds trust with stakeholders and enhances operational resilience.
- Provides competitive edge in regulated sectors through proactive cybersecurity.
Implementation Overview
- Identify applicability via size-cap (50+ employees/€10M turnover for important entities).
- Conduct risk assessments, develop reporting plans, train management.
- Targets EU medium/large organizations in critical sectors.
- National transposition by October 2024; involves ongoing audits and evidence-based assurance.
ISA 95 Details
What It Is
ISA-95 (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264) is an international framework standard for integrating enterprise business systems (e.g., ERP) with manufacturing operations and control systems (e.g., MES). It defines models for information exchange at the Level 3-4 interface of the Purdue hierarchy, using activity, object, and transaction models to reduce integration risks.
Key Components
- Five hierarchical levels (0-4) from Purdue model
- Eight parts: terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions/messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 5-8)
- Core principles: semantic consistency, shared vocabulary, technology-agnostic exchanges
- Compliance via alignment, no mandatory certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Cuts integration costs/errors, enables semantic consistency
- Supports OEE, traceability, Industry 4.0 agility
- Facilitates IT/OT collaboration, cybersecurity segmentation
- Builds stakeholder trust through auditable architectures
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assessment, canonical modeling, pilot, rollout/governance
- Targets manufacturing industries globally
- Involves data stewardship, testing, change management
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | ISA 95 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting for critical sectors | Enterprise-control system integration, manufacturing information models |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport | Global manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with national transposition, fines | Voluntary international standard, no legal enforcement |
| Testing | Incident reporting, spot checks by national authorities | No formal testing; self-assessment, architectural alignment |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover or €10M fines | No penalties; business integration benefits only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and ISA 95
NIS2 FAQ
ISA 95 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EMAS vs J-SOX
EMAS vs J-SOX: EU's voluntary eco-management scheme for performance & transparency vs Japan's ICFR regime for financial reliability. Compare compliance, benefits & strategy now!
IEC 62443 vs FedRAMP
Discover IEC 62443 vs FedRAMP: Compare OT cybersecurity for IACS (zones, SLs, shared roles) with federal cloud baselines (NIST 800-53). Align standards for resilient industrial security. Dive in now!
WELL vs ISO 27701
Compare WELL vs ISO 27701: Health certification (Bronze-Platinum, 10 concepts) vs privacy PIMS. Boost ESG, compliance & wellness—discover key differences now!