Standards Comparison

    NIS2

    Mandatory
    2022

    EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors

    VS

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection.

    Quick Verdict

    NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU essential entities via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while K-PIPA enforces strict data privacy for Korean data handlers through consent and subject rights. Organizations adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance, K-PIPA to avoid fines and build trust.

    Cybersecurity

    NIS2

    Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months
    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer for all data handlers
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data processing
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
    • Extraterritorial scope for foreign entities targeting Koreans
    • 10-day response time for data subject rights

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIS2 Details

    What It Is

    NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common level of cybersecurity across member states, targeting essential and important entities in critical sectors like energy, transport, and digital infrastructure. It uses a risk-based approach with continuous assurance rather than static compliance.

    Key Components

    • Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
    • Strict timelines: 24-hour early warnings, 72-hour notifications, one-month final reports.
    • Mandates supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
    • Built on standards like ISO 27001; no formal certification but national enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal obligation for in-scope entities to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats, builds stakeholder trust, ensures continuity. Provides competitive edge through proactive cybersecurity.

    Implementation Overview

    Applies to medium/large entities (>50 employees, >€10M turnover) in EU sectors. Involves risk assessments, training, reporting setup, supply chain audits. Member states transposed by October 2024; ongoing spot checks by authorities. Tailor to national variations.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It protects personal information of Korean residents, including sensitive data like health and biometrics, applying to all data handlers—domestic and foreign—with a consent-centric, risk-based approach emphasizing transparency and accountability.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, explicit consent.
    • Obligations: mandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs), security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
    • Breach notifications within 72 hours; cross-border transfers require consent or certifications.
    • Enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% of revenue; no fixed control count, but granular requirements.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal compliance mandatory for entities processing Korean data to avoid fines (e.g., Google's $50M penalty).
    • Enhances risk management, builds stakeholder trust, enables EU adequacy data flows.
    • Strategic benefits: privacy-by-design fosters innovation, competitive edge in Asia-Pacific.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, data mapping, technical controls, training.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries targeting Koreans; audits via PIPC guidelines, no formal certification but ISMS-P recommended. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIS2
    Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, resilience
    K-PIPA
    Personal data protection, consent, subject rights

    Industry

    NIS2
    Essential sectors (energy, transport, digital), EU-focused
    K-PIPA
    All data handlers (public/private), Korea residents

    Nature

    NIS2
    Mandatory EU directive, national transposition
    K-PIPA
    Mandatory national law, PIPC enforcement

    Testing

    NIS2
    Risk assessments, spot checks by authorities
    K-PIPA
    Security audits, CPO oversight, no mandatory DPIA

    Penalties

    NIS2
    Up to 2% global turnover or €10M fines
    K-PIPA
    Up to 3% revenue or KRW 3B fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIS2 and K-PIPA

    NIS2 FAQ

    K-PIPA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages