NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates EU cybersecurity for essential entities with incident reporting, while MLPS 2.0 enforces graded protection for all China networks via PSB oversight. Companies adopt NIS2 for EU compliance, MLPS for China operations to avoid fines and ensure resilience.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Broadens scope via size-cap rule to medium/large entities
- Mandates 24-hour early warning incident reporting timelines
- Holds senior management directly accountable for compliance
- Imposes fines up to 2% global annual turnover
- Requires supply chain security and risk management measures
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)
Key Features
- Five impact-based protection levels (1-5)
- Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
- Graded controls across technical/management domains
- Third-party evaluations with 75% pass threshold
- Extended requirements for cloud/IoT/big data
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding cybersecurity obligations beyond the original NIS Directive. It targets essential and important entities in 18 sectors like energy, transport, and digital services, using a risk-based, all-hazards approach to boost resilience against cyber threats.
Key Components
- **Four pillarsrisk management, business continuity, incident reporting, corporate accountability.
- Multi-stage reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report.
- Supply chain security, access controls, encryption, continuous assessments.
- National authorities enforce via spot checks and cooperation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids fines up to €10M or 2% global turnover.
- Enhances resilience, ensures continuity, builds trust.
- Leverages standards like ISO 27001 for strategic edge.
Implementation Overview
- Targets medium/large EU entities (50+/250+ employees).
- Involves gap analysis, measures deployment, registration, training.
- Transposed by October 2024; demands ongoing assurance. (178 words)
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
China's Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0) is a mandatory regulatory framework under Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law. It requires all network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, public order, and rights, implementing graded technical and management controls.
Key Components
- Domains: physical security, network/host protection, data security, security management.
- Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
- Compliance model: self-grading, expert review/filing for Level 2+, third-party evaluations (75% pass threshold), PSB oversight.
Why Organizations Use It
- Avoids fines, inspections, operational disruptions.
- Rationalizes cybersecurity investments, strengthens resilience.
- Ensures compliance with CSL, DSL, PIPL; builds regulator/stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: inventory/grading, gap analysis, remediation, evaluation, continuous monitoring.
- Applies to all China-based network operators across industries/sizes; annual audits for Level 3+.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
NIS2 FAQ
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application
Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
COPPA vs NIST 800-171
Explore COPPA vs NIST 800-171: Child privacy consent rules meet CUI cybersecurity for contractors. Key diffs, fines ($170M+), compliance tips. Safeguard data now!
ISO 14001 vs EPA
Discover ISO 14001 vs EPA: global EMS standard vs U.S. regulations. Boost compliance, cut risks, drive sustainability gains. Compare key differences now!
ISO 27032 vs FISMA
Compare ISO 27032 vs FISMA: Guidelines for cyberspace security vs US federal compliance. Discover key differences in strategy, controls & implementation for resilient cyber defense today!