NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
SOX
U.S. federal act for financial reporting controls and accountability
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates EU cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while SOX enforces U.S. public company financial integrity through ICFR assessments and executive certifications. Organizations adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance, SOX for investor protection.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2 Directive)
Key Features
- Expanded scope with size-cap rule for medium/large entities
- Strict multi-stage incident reporting within 24/72 hours
- Direct senior management accountability for compliance
- Continuous risk management including supply chain security
- Harmonized EU enforcement with fines up to 2% turnover
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- Mandates ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
- Requires CEO/CFO certifications with personal liability (Section 302/906)
- Establishes PCAOB for public audit firm oversight
- Enforces auditor independence and rotation rules (Title II)
- Provides whistleblower protections against retaliation (Section 806)
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive to enhance cybersecurity resilience across member states. It targets essential and important entities in broadened sectors like energy, transport, health, and digital infrastructure, using a risk-based approach with continuous assurance.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
- Strict timelines: 24-hour early warnings, 72-hour notifications, one-month final reports.
- Supply chain security, access controls, encryption; built on standards like ISO 27001.
- No formal certification; compliance via national transposition and audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for medium/large entities in scope to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats, ensures service continuity, builds stakeholder trust, and supports cross-border cooperation amid rising attacks.
Implementation Overview
Proactive enterprise transformation: conduct risk assessments, implement measures, train staff, register with authorities. Applies to EU entities >50 employees or €10M turnover; varies by member state post-October 2024 transposition. Ongoing spot checks demand real-time evidence.
SOX Details
What It Is
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute establishing corporate accountability standards for public companies. It aims to protect investors by enhancing internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) accuracy and reliability. SOX uses a risk-based approach through SEC rules, PCAOB standards, and COSO frameworks.
Key Components
- **PillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), certifications/ICFR (Titles III-IV).
- Core sections: 302 (CEO/CFO certifications), 404 (ICFR assessments), 409 (real-time disclosures).
- No fixed controls; emphasizes effective systems with entity-level, process, and ITGC controls.
- Compliance model: annual management reports, auditor attestations for larger filers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for U.S. public issuers to avoid criminal/civil penalties.
- Builds investor trust, reduces restatements, lowers capital costs.
- Strengthens governance, fraud deterrence, operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: risk scoping, documentation, testing, remediation, monitoring.
- Targets public companies; scales for size (exemptions for EGCs/non-accelerated filers).
- Involves ITGC, continuous monitoring; external audits required.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | SOX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, supply chain security | Internal controls over financial reporting, corporate governance |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU critical sectors (energy, transport, digital) | U.S. public companies across all industries |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive, national transposition required | Mandatory U.S. federal law for public issuers |
| Testing | Continuous risk assessments, incident response testing | Annual ICFR design/operating effectiveness testing |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover or €10M for essential entities | Criminal fines up to $5M, 20 years imprisonment |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and SOX
NIS2 FAQ
SOX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025
Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr
CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 17025 vs CMMI
Discover ISO 17025 vs CMMI: Lab competence for valid results vs process maturity for IT excellence. Compare structures, benefits & pitfalls. Boost compliance now!
NIST CSF vs NERC CIP
Discover NIST CSF vs NERC CIP: Flexible risk framework meets mandatory BES cyber controls. Compare tiers, standards—boost grid compliance & resilience today!
ISO 9001 vs AEO
Explore ISO 9001 vs AEO: Compare quality management certification & Authorized Economic Operator status. Key differences, benefits, requirements & implementation tips for global success.