Standards Comparison

    NIST 800-171

    Mandatory
    2020

    U.S. standard protecting CUI in nonfederal systems

    VS

    CIS Controls

    Voluntary
    2021

    Prioritized cybersecurity best practices framework

    Quick Verdict

    NIST 800-171 mandates CUI safeguards for federal contractors via contracts, while CIS Controls offer voluntary, prioritized hygiene for all organizations. Contractors adopt 800-171 for compliance; others use CIS for risk reduction and broad framework alignment.

    Controlled Unclassified Information

    NIST 800-171

    NIST SP 800-171: Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Protects CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
    • 110 requirements across 14 security families
    • Mandates SSP and POA&M documentation
    • Enables CUI enclave scoping for boundaries
    • DFARS-required for DoD contractor compliance
    Cybersecurity

    CIS Controls

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
    • Scalable Implementation Groups IG1-IG3
    • Offense-informed, community-driven best practices
    • Mappings to NIST, ISO, PCI DSS frameworks
    • Free Benchmarks and assessment tools

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST 800-171 Details

    What It Is

    NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 is a U.S. government framework providing security requirements for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) confidentiality in nonfederal systems. Tailored from SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, it uses a control-based, risk-commensurate approach for contractors and supply chains, applicable to components processing, storing, or transmitting CUI.

    Key Components

    • 97-110 requirements (r3/r2) organized into 14-17 families like Access Control, Audit, Configuration Management.
    • Built on FIPS 200 and SP 800-53; includes SP 800-171A assessment procedures.
    • Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M).
    • Compliance via self-assessment or third-party audits like CMMC Level 2.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated by DFARS 252.204-7012 for DoD contractors handling CDI; ensures contract eligibility, reduces breach risks, builds stakeholder trust. Provides competitive edge in federal procurement and supply chain resilience.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scope CUI enclave, gap analysis, implement controls (MFA, SIEM), document SSP/POA&M. Suits all sizes, especially defense contractors; requires ongoing monitoring, no universal certification but CMMC for DoD.

    CIS Controls Details

    What It Is

    CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce cyber risks. It focuses on actionable safeguards across hybrid environments, emphasizing governance, asset management, and resilience against common threats.

    Key Components

    • 18 controls with 153 safeguards, organized into Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3) for scalability.
    • Core areas: asset inventory, data protection, access management, vulnerability management, incident response.
    • Built on offense-informed principles; maps to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.
    • No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates breaches, accelerates regulatory compliance, lowers costs.
    • Builds trust with insurers, partners; enables competitive differentiation.
    • Risk reduction via prioritized hygiene; operational efficiency gains.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: governance, discovery, foundational controls, expansion, assurance.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; tools like CIS Benchmarks aid execution.
    • Involves automation, metrics, cross-functional teams; 9–18 months typical.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST 800-171
    CUI protection in nonfederal systems, 17 families
    CIS Controls
    Prioritized cyber hygiene, 18 controls 153 safeguards

    Industry

    NIST 800-171
    Defense contractors, federal supply chain primarily
    CIS Controls
    All industries, organization sizes worldwide

    Nature

    NIST 800-171
    Contractual NIST standard, mandatory via DFARS
    CIS Controls
    Voluntary best practices framework

    Testing

    NIST 800-171
    SP 800-171A procedures, CMMC assessments
    CIS Controls
    Self-assessments, IG-based maturity checks

    Penalties

    NIST 800-171
    Contract loss, ineligibility, DFARS penalties
    CIS Controls
    No legal penalties, reputational risk only

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST 800-171 and CIS Controls

    NIST 800-171 FAQ

    CIS Controls FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages