What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-171**?

**NIST SP 800-171 provides recommended security requirements for protecting the confidentiality of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in nonfederal systems and organizations.** Requirements apply to components that process, store, transmit CUI, or provide protection for such components. Derived from SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, it ensures consistent safeguards via contracts like DFARS 252.204-7012. Rev. 3 (May 2024) supersedes Rev. 2, adding families like Supply Chain Risk Management.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-171**?

**Nonfederal organizations handling CUI via federal contracts, grants, or agreements must comply with NIST SP 800-171.** This includes DoD contractors/subcontractors under DFARS 252.204-7012 for covered defense information (CDI) in covered contractor information systems. Applicability targets systems not operated on behalf of agencies under FISMA. Rev. 3 applies to CUI components; cloud providers require FedRAMP Moderate equivalence.

Does **NIST 800-171** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-171 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** It recommends self-assessments using SP 800-171A procedures (examine/interview/test). DoD may require SPRS score submissions or CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO for prioritized contracts). SSP/POA&M document implementation; contractual clauses dictate assurance levels.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-171** be performed?

**Organizations must perform NIST SP 800-171 assessments at least annually or after significant changes.** SP 800-171A r3 supports continuous monitoring; DoD requires annual SPRS reaffirmation for self-assessments. Rev. 3 emphasizes ongoing security assessment and monitoring (CA family), with POA&Ms tracking remediation.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-171**?

**Non-compliance with NIST SP 800-171 risks contract ineligibility, termination, and DoD procurement disqualification.** DFARS 252.204-7012 mandates implementation; failures trigger 72-hour incident reporting, remedial demands, SPRS score penalties (down to -203), and potential False Claims Act liability. No direct fines, but business/reputational impacts are severe.

An **NIST 800-171** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST SP 800-171 includes mappings to NIST SP 800-53, NIST CSF, and ISO 27001 in appendices.** Rev. 2 Appendix D details alignments; Rev. 3 tightens SP 800-53 r5 ties. Organizations demonstrate compliance within existing programs via SSP, using tailoring for equivalencies like FedRAMP Moderate.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-171**?

**The first step is defining the system boundary and scoping CUI components per NIST SP 800-171 guidance.** Identify assets processing/storing/transmitting CUI or providing protection; use enclaves for isolation. Develop initial SSP describing environment and produce gap analysis against 17 Rev. 3 families (97 requirements).

What is the primary objective of **SOX**?

**The primary objective of SOX is to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures under federal securities laws.** Enacted July 30, 2002, following scandals like Enron and WorldCom, it establishes PCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications (**Section 302**), and ICFR assessments (**Section 404**).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOX**?

**SOX applies to U.S.-listed public companies, including foreign private issuers, and their PCAOB-registered auditors.** **Section 404(a)** mandates management ICFR assessments for all issuers; **Section 404(b)** requires auditor attestation except for non-accelerated filers (public float under $75 million) and Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs, up to 5 years post-IPO unless exceeding $1.235 billion revenue).

Oes **SOX** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOX Section 404(b) requires external auditors to attest to management's ICFR assessment per PCAOB standards for applicable issuers.** Exemptions apply to non-accelerated filers and EGCs, but all must perform **Section 404(a)** management assessments with documented evidence.

How often should an assessment for **SOX** be performed?

**SOX requires annual ICFR assessments by management under Section 404(a), reported in Form 10-K.** Quarterly **Section 302** certifications support ongoing disclosure controls; mature programs include continuous monitoring, interim testing, and year-end validation of key controls like ITGCs.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOX**?

**Non-compliance triggers civil fines, criminal penalties up to $5 million and 20 years imprisonment under Sections 802 and 906, and SEC enforcement.** Material weaknesses lead to restatements, adverse audit opinions, delisting risk, higher capital costs, and personal executive liability for false certifications.

An **SOX** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, these SOX FAQs address only SOX requirements and do not map to other frameworks.** Focus remains on U.S. public issuer obligations under SEC/PCAOB rules.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOX**?

**The first step is a top-down risk assessment to scope material financial accounts, processes, and assertions per PCAOB AS 2201.** Establish governance (audit committee oversight, RACI matrix), then document key controls using COSO, prioritizing entity-level, ITGC, and process controls.

NIST 800-171 vs SOX

Standards Comparison

NIST 800-171

Mandatory

2020

U.S. standard protecting CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

SOX

Mandatory

2002

U.S. regulation mandating internal controls over financial reporting

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-171 protects CUI confidentiality for federal contractors via scoped security requirements, while SOX mandates ICFR assessments for public companies with CEO/CFO certifications. Contractors use NIST for DoD eligibility; publics use SOX for investor protection and legal compliance.

Controlled Unclassified Information

NIST 800-171

NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Protects CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems
Requires SSP and POA&M documentation artifacts
Organized into 17 security requirement families
Supports scoped CUI enclave isolation strategy
Aligns with DFARS for contractual enforcement

Financial Reporting

SOX

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandates ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
Requires CEO/CFO certifications with personal liability (Sections 302/906)
Establishes PCAOB for audit firm oversight and standards
Enforces auditor independence and rotation rules (Title II)
Imposes criminal penalties for document tampering (Section 802)

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 is a U.S. government special publication providing recommended security requirements for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) confidentiality in nonfederal systems. It is a control-based framework tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, applicable to contractors handling CUI via contracts.

Key Components

97 requirements across 17 families including Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management.
Built on FIPS 200 and SP 800-53 principles.
Compliance via System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M).
Assessment procedures in companion SP 800-171A using examine/interview/test methods.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for DoD contractors under DFARS 252.204-7012.
Enables CMMC Level 2 certification and SPRS scoring.
Reduces breach risks, ensures contract eligibility.
Builds stakeholder trust in supply chains.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping CUI enclaves, gap analysis, control deployment, evidence collection.
Suits federal contractors across sizes; cloud via FedRAMP equivalence.
Self or third-party assessments; ongoing monitoring required.

SOX Details

What It Is

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted post-Enron scandals to protect investors via accurate corporate disclosures. It mandates internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) using a risk-based approach aligned with frameworks like COSO.

Key Components

**Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive accountability (Titles III–XI).
Core sections: §302/906 (CEO/CFO certifications), §404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), §409 (real-time disclosures).
Built on COSO principles; no fixed control count, focuses on key controls.
Compliance via annual management reports and auditor opinions.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for U.S. public companies; reduces restatements, fraud risk.
Enhances governance, investor trust, operational efficiency.
Lowers cost of capital; aids M&A/IPO readiness.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, monitoring.
Applies to public issuers; exemptions for smaller filers.
Requires external audits for most; ongoing via GRC tools.

Key Differences

Aspect	NIST 800-171	SOX
Scope	CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems	Financial reporting internal controls (ICFR)
Industry	Defense contractors, federal supply chain	All public companies, financial reporting
Nature	Recommended security requirements, contractual	Mandatory federal law with criminal penalties
Testing	Examine/interview/test via SP 800-171A	Annual ICFR assessment and auditor attestation
Penalties	Contract ineligibility, SPRS score impact	Fines up to $5M, imprisonment up to 20 years

Scope

NIST 800-171

CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

SOX

Financial reporting internal controls (ICFR)

Industry

NIST 800-171

Defense contractors, federal supply chain

SOX

All public companies, financial reporting

Nature

NIST 800-171

Recommended security requirements, contractual

SOX

Mandatory federal law with criminal penalties

Testing

NIST 800-171

Examine/interview/test via SP 800-171A

SOX

Annual ICFR assessment and auditor attestation

Penalties

NIST 800-171

Contract ineligibility, SPRS score impact

SOX

Fines up to $5M, imprisonment up to 20 years

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about NIST 800-171 and SOX

NIST 800-171 FAQ

SOX FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic

Ace your SOC 2 Type 2 audit with the first 5 essential steps: evidence collection, auditor tips, red flags from SignWell's experience. Get checklists & infograp

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

RoHS vs ISO 31000

RoHS vs ISO 31000: Compare EU RoHS's 10 hazardous substance bans in EEE with ISO 31000's risk framework for compliance mastery. Unlock exemptions, testing & strategies now!

K-PIPA vs FSSC 22000

Compare K-PIPA vs FSSC 22000: Decode South Korea's stringent data privacy law against global food safety certification. Essential requirements, compliance strategies, and business insights await.

POPIA vs ISO 19600

Compare POPIA vs ISO 19600: SA's privacy law meets global compliance guidelines. Discover key differences, synergies, and strategies for integrated risk management and enforcement readiness.

NIST 800-171

SOX

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-171

Key Features

SOX

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

NIST 800-171 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOX Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

NIST 800-171 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-171?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-171?

Does NIST 800-171 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-171 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-171?

An NIST 800-171 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-171?

SOX FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOX?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOX?

Oes SOX require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOX be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOX?

An SOX be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOX?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

RoHS vs ISO 31000

K-PIPA vs FSSC 22000

POPIA vs ISO 19600