Standards Comparison

    NIST 800-171

    Mandatory
    2020

    U.S. framework protecting CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems

    VS

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

    Mandatory
    2023

    U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity disclosures in public companies

    Quick Verdict

    NIST 800-171 mandates CUI controls for defense contractors via contracts, while U.S. SEC Rules require public firms to disclose material incidents in 4 days and annual governance, ensuring investor transparency.

    Controlled Unclassified Information

    NIST 800-171

    NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Tailored 110 requirements protecting CUI confidentiality
    • Scoped to nonfederal systems processing CUI
    • Mandates System Security Plan and POA&M
    • Supports CUI security domain isolation
    • Derived from SP 800-53 moderate baseline
    Capital Markets

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

    Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Four-business-day material incident disclosure on Form 8-K
    • Annual risk management and governance in Regulation S-K Item 106
    • Inline XBRL tagging for structured comparability
    • Board oversight and management expertise disclosures
    • Third-party risk processes inclusion

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST 800-171 Details

    What It Is

    NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 is a U.S. government framework providing security requirements for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) confidentiality in nonfederal systems. Its primary scope targets federal contractors handling CUI, using a control-based approach tailored from SP 800-53 moderate baseline and FIPS 200.

    Key Components

    • 110 requirements (r2) across 14 families like Access Control, Audit, Configuration Management (expanded to 17 families in r3).
    • Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP) and Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M).
    • Assessment via SP 800-171A procedures (examine/interview/test).
    • r3 introduces ODPs and new families (Planning, Supply Chain Risk Management).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandate via DFARS 252.204-7012 for DoD suppliers.
    • Enables CMMC Level 2 certification and SPRS scoring.
    • Reduces CUI breach risks, enhances supply chain trust.
    • Provides defensible scoping via CUI enclaves.

    Implementation Overview

    • Gap analysis, SSP/POA&M development, control remediation.
    • Applies to contractors in defense, federal supply chains.
    • Self-assessment or third-party via C3PAO; annual affirmations.

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details

    What It Is

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) is a mandatory regulation for public companies under the Securities Exchange Act. It standardizes disclosures on cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and material incidents, applying a materiality-based approach aligned with securities law principles like TSC Industries v. Northway.

    Key Components

    • **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material cybersecurity incidents within four business days of materiality determination.
    • **Annual disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 mandates descriptions of risk processes, governance, and impacts in Form 10-K.
    • Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
    • Built on existing disclosure frameworks; no fixed controls, emphasizes processes over technical details.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Public companies comply to meet legal obligations, enhance investor protection, improve capital market efficiency, and reduce enforcement risks (e.g., Yahoo, Ashford cases). It drives integrated risk management, board oversight, and third-party risk focus for stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    Involves cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, governance updates, and Inline XBRL readiness. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants; phased compliance (Dec 2023 onward). No certification, but SEC reviews and enforcement apply. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST 800-171
    CUI protection in nonfederal systems via 110 controls
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    Public company disclosures of incidents and governance

    Industry

    NIST 800-171
    Defense contractors, federal supply chain (DoD focus)
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    All SEC registrants, public companies (financial markets)

    Nature

    NIST 800-171
    Mandatory NIST controls via contracts (Rev 3 current)
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    Mandatory SEC reporting rules (disclosure-focused)

    Testing

    NIST 800-171
    SP 800-171A assessments, CMMC certifications
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    Materiality determinations, Inline XBRL filings

    Penalties

    NIST 800-171
    Contract ineligibility, CMMC failure, SPRS scoring
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    SEC enforcement, fines, shareholder litigation

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST 800-171 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

    NIST 800-171 FAQ

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages