NIST 800-53
U.S. catalog of security and privacy controls
BRC
Global standard for food safety in manufacturing
Quick Verdict
NIST 800-53 offers flexible security/privacy controls for federal and any organizations managing info risks via RMF, while BRC mandates food safety certification for manufacturers to ensure retailer access and prevent contamination recalls.
NIST 800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls
Key Features
- Outcome-based controls across 20 families
- Baselines separated into SP 800-53B for tailoring
- Integrated privacy controls with PT family
- Supply Chain Risk Management (SR) family
- OSCAL machine-readable formats for automation
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- Senior management commitment and food safety culture plan
- Codex HACCP-based food safety plan with fundamentals
- Site standards, zoning, and environmental monitoring requirements
- GFSI-benchmarked certification with grading system
- Unannounced audits and root cause analysis mandates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST 800-53 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary control catalog for security and privacy safeguards. It provides a flexible, outcome-based framework for protecting information systems against diverse threats, emphasizing risk management over checklists.
Key Components
- 20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, SR, PT) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
- Baselines (Low/Moderate/High, Privacy) in SP 800-53B for tailoring.
- Integrated with RMF (SP 800-37), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), and OSCAL for automation.
- No formal certification; compliance via authorization to operate (ATO).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal agencies/contractors under FISMA/OMB A-130.
- Builds resilience, enables reciprocity, supports FedRAMP.
- Enhances risk management, supply chain security, privacy compliance.
- Competitive edge via audit-ready programs and cross-framework mappings.
Implementation Overview
Follow **RMF lifecyclecategorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, authorize, monitor. Suited for federal, critical infrastructure, enterprises; phased rollout with automation reduces burden. (178 words)
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and prerequisite programs like GMP/GHP.
Key Components
Nine core clauses cover governance, HACCP, quality systems, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, and traded products. Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management) are non-negotiable. Built on risk assessments and validated controls, it uses annual audits for certification grading (AA/A/B/C/D).
Why Organizations Use It
Provides market access to retailers mandating GFSI schemes, reduces duplicative audits, evidences due diligence, and mitigates recalls from allergens/pathogens. Enhances operational resilience, stakeholder trust, and compliance with regulations like FSMA.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, then certification audit (announced/unannounced). Suited for food manufacturers globally; requires 6-12 months for mid-sized sites with CAPEX for facilities/training.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST 800-53 | BRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security/privacy controls for info systems | Food safety, quality in manufacturing |
| Industry | Federal, any orgs processing info globally | Food manufacturers, retailers worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary control catalog, risk-based | GFSI-benchmarked certification standard |
| Testing | RMF assessments, continuous monitoring | Annual on-site audits, announced/unannounced |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of authorization | Certification withdrawal, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST 800-53 and BRC
NIST 800-53 FAQ
BRC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UAE PDPL vs ISO 26000
UAE PDPL vs ISO 26000: Compare data privacy law with social responsibility guidance. Uncover synergies in governance, rights, security & compliance. Align now!
GDPR vs ISO 9001
Compare GDPR vs ISO 9001: Privacy law with fines up to 4% turnover vs QMS for excellence. Key diffs, overlaps & tips for compliance. Boost your strategy now!
CMMC vs Australian Privacy Act
CMMC vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare US DoD cybersecurity maturity with Australia's data privacy principles. Master compliance strategies, risks & frameworks for global ops now.