NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide
HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF offers voluntary, flexible risk management guidance for all organizations via Profiles and Tiers, while HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable, prescriptive control assurance through validated assessments, primarily for healthcare and regulated sectors seeking standardized third-party trust.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Key Features
- Govern function establishes strategic cybersecurity oversight
- Six core functions manage full risk lifecycle
- Four Implementation Tiers evaluate maturity levels
- Profiles enable current-target gap analysis
- Flexible mappings to ISO 27001 and NIST 800-53
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ frameworks for assess once report many
- Risk-based tailoring via organizational system factors
- Five-level maturity model with weighted scoring
- Tiered certifications e1 i1 r2 with MyCSF platform
- Cloud inheritance reduces 60-85% assessment scope
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It offers organizations of all sizes and sectors a flexible, non-prescriptive structure to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks, evolving from critical infrastructure focus to universal applicability.
Key Components
- Six core **FunctionsGovern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—providing lifecycle coverage.
- 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53.
- Four Implementation Tiers (Partial to Adaptive) for maturity assessment.
- Framework Profiles (Current vs. Target) for prioritization. No formal certification; relies on self-attestation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Fosters common language for executive-technical communication.
- Enables cost-effective risk prioritization and supply chain management.
- Demonstrates due care, supports compliance (mandatory for U.S. federal).
- Builds stakeholder trust, elevates cybersecurity to enterprise risk strategy.
Implementation Overview
- Develop Profiles, assess Tiers, map Core activities.
- Involves gap analysis, policy alignment, continuous monitoring.
- Suited for all industries/geographies; quick starts for SMEs via guides.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
The HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ sources including HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It provides risk-tailored assurance via structured scoping, maturity scoring, and centralized validation for sensitive data protection.
Key Components
- 19 assessment domains (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management, Incident Management)
- Hierarchical: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications
- **Five-level maturity modelPolicy (15%), Procedure (20%), Implemented (40%), Measured (10%), Managed (15%)
- Tiered products: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year); MyCSF platform enables inheritance
Why Organizations Use It
- **Unified complianceAssess once, report many across regulations
- **Third-party trustStandardized reports reduce questionnaires/audits
- **Risk reduction99.4% breach-free rate; operational maturity
- **Market edgeRequired by healthcare payers; cyber insurance benefits
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Scoping/gap analysis (2-4 months), remediation (3-12 months), validated assessment
- Targets regulated sectors (healthcare, finance); any size via tailoring
- Requires Authorized Assessors, evidence management; ~12-18 months total
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | HITRUST CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management across 6 functions | Prescriptive controls across 19 domains, 60+ standards |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any size | Healthcare primary, regulated industries, all sizes |
| Nature | Voluntary risk management framework | Certifiable control assurance program |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers | Validated assessments by authorized external assessors |
| Penalties | No penalties, loss of self-attested posture | No certification, reliance party contract risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and HITRUST CSF
NIST CSF FAQ
HITRUST CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
HIPAA vs AS9100
Compare HIPAA vs AS9100: HIPAA protects health data privacy/security; AS9100 drives aerospace quality/safety. Unlock key differences & compliance strategies now!
Six Sigma vs Australian Privacy Act
Discover Six Sigma vs Australian Privacy Act: Integrate data-driven quality with privacy compliance for secure, efficient operations. Unlock strategies now! (152 characters)
GMP vs WCAG
Discover GMP vs WCAG: Pharma's Good Manufacturing Practices (FDA/EU) vs W3C Web Accessibility Guidelines. Key differences, compliance tips for quality & digital inclusion. Dive in!