NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide
ISO 19600
International guidelines for compliance management systems
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF offers voluntary cybersecurity risk management for all organizations, while ISO 19600 provides guidelines for compliance systems. Companies adopt NIST CSF for cyber posture improvement and ISO 19600 for structured compliance governance.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0
Key Features
- Introduces Govern function as central governance pillar
- Six core Functions spanning cybersecurity lifecycle
- Four Implementation Tiers for maturity assessment
- Profiles for current-target gap analysis
- Mappings to standards like ISO 27001
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Risk-based compliance management framework
- Good governance principles and proportionality
- Annex SL structure with PDCA cycle
- Scalable for all organization sizes
- Integrates with existing ISO management systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline for cybersecurity risk management. Developed by NIST, it provides flexible structure for organizations to identify, protect, detect, respond, recover, and govern cyber risks across any size or sector.
Key Components
- **Six Core FunctionsGovern (new), Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover.
- **Categories and Subcategories22 categories, 112 subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53.
- **Implementation TiersPartial to Adaptive for maturity evaluation.
- **ProfilesCurrent vs. Target for prioritization. No formal certification; self-attestation.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances risk communication, aligns cyber with business strategy, demonstrates due care, supports compliance, improves supply chain oversight. Builds stakeholder trust, enables insurance discounts, fosters continuous improvement.
Implementation Overview
Start with Current Profile assessment, gap analysis to Target Profile. Applicable globally, all industries/sizes. Use free NIST resources, vendor tools; iterative via Tiers. Focuses outcomes over prescriptions.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It offers recommendations—not requirements—for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The risk-based approach emphasizes proportionality, applying universally across organization sizes, sectors, and regions.
Key Components
- 10 clauses following Annex SL structure: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
- Key elements: obligations identification, risk assessment, controls, monitoring, PDCA cycle.
- Non-certifiable; supports benchmarking and integration with other ISO standards.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates fines, disruptions, reputational damage via structured risk management.
- Achieves 10-20% compliance cost savings, enhanced decision-making, market access.
- Builds ethical culture, stakeholder trust; future-proofs for ISO 37301.
Implementation Overview
- **Phasedleadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, continual improvement.
- Scalable for SMEs to globals, all industries; internal audits, no certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | ISO 19600 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle | Compliance management systems guidelines |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any size | All organizations, any sector globally |
| Nature | Voluntary cybersecurity framework | Non-certifiable guidance standard |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles/Tiers | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | No penalties, voluntary adoption | No direct penalties, withdrawn 2021 |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and ISO 19600
NIST CSF FAQ
ISO 19600 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 26000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Uncover ISO 26000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Compare SR guidance on governance & risk with mandatory incident disclosures. Align strategies for compliance & resilience. Explore now!
ISO 37301 vs AS9110C
Compare ISO 37301 vs AS9110C: Certifiable CMS for risk-based compliance vs aerospace QMS for MRO safety. Integrate for superior governance, audits & certification. Explore now!
ISO 14001 vs WEEE
Compare ISO 14001 vs WEEE: Voluntary EMS standard for continual improvement meets mandatory EU e-waste directive on collection & recycling. Boost compliance & sustainability today.