Standards Comparison

    NIST CSF

    Voluntary
    2024

    Voluntary framework for cybersecurity risk management

    VS

    ISO 27018

    Voluntary
    2019

    International code for PII protection in public clouds.

    Quick Verdict

    NIST CSF provides flexible cybersecurity risk management for all organizations globally, while ISO 27018 offers privacy-specific controls for cloud PII processors. Companies adopt NIST CSF for broad risk reduction and ISO 27018 to demonstrate audited cloud privacy compliance.

    Cybersecurity

    NIST CSF

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes common language for risk communication
    • Govern function elevates cybersecurity governance
    • Implementation Tiers assess process maturity
    • Profiles enable gap analysis and roadmaps
    • Maps to standards like ISO 27001
    Cloud Privacy

    ISO 27018

    ISO/IEC 27018:2025 PII protection in public clouds

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • PII processor controls for public cloud environments
    • Subprocessor transparency and disclosure requirements
    • Prohibits PII use for marketing without consent
    • Mandates customer breach notification procedures
    • Supports data subject rights like erasure/portability

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST CSF Details

    What It Is

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline for managing cybersecurity risks. Developed by NIST, it provides flexible, adaptable structure for organizations of all sizes and sectors to identify, protect, detect, respond, recover, and govern cyber risks.

    Key Components

    • **Six Core FunctionsGovern (new), Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover.
    • **Framework CoreOrganized into 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories with informative references.
    • **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial to Adaptive) for maturity assessment.
    • **ProfilesCurrent vs. Target for gap analysis. No formal certification; self-attestation used.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances risk communication via common language, supports compliance, prioritizes investments, builds stakeholder trust. Aligns cyber with enterprise risk, addresses supply chain threats, demonstrates due care without mandates (except U.S. federal agencies).

    Implementation Overview

    Start with Current Profile assessment, prioritize gaps via Tiers. Involves policy development, training, tooling. Applicable globally, any industry/size; quick starts for SMEs, ongoing for enterprises. Uses mappings to ISO 27001, NIST 800-53.

    ISO 27018 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27018 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary purpose is to provide privacy-specific controls addressing cloud risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border data flows. It uses a risk-based approach integrated into an Information Security Management System (ISMS).

    Key Components

    • Privacy controls (~25-30 additional) on consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, and accountability.
    • Mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A themes: Organizational, People, Physical, Technological.
    • Built on ISO 29100 principles; assessed via ISO 27001 audits, not standalone certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Builds customer trust, accelerates procurement, aligns with GDPR/HIPAA processor obligations.
    • Reduces security questionnaire friction; favors cyber insurance terms.
    • Differentiates CSPs in competitive markets.

    Implementation Overview

    • Gap analysis against existing ISMS, add controls to Statement of Applicability.
    • Involves policy updates, subprocessor transparency, training, audits.
    • Suited for CSPs of all sizes; requires ISO 27001 base; annual surveillance audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST CSF
    Cybersecurity risk management across organizations
    ISO 27018
    PII protection in public clouds for processors

    Industry

    NIST CSF
    All sectors, sizes, global
    ISO 27018
    Cloud service providers, privacy-focused

    Nature

    NIST CSF
    Voluntary framework, no certification
    ISO 27018
    Code of practice, extends ISO 27001 certification

    Testing

    NIST CSF
    Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers
    ISO 27018
    Audits within ISO 27001 certification process

    Penalties

    NIST CSF
    No legal penalties, voluntary adoption
    ISO 27018
    No standalone penalties, tied to ISO 27001

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST CSF and ISO 27018

    NIST CSF FAQ

    ISO 27018 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages