Standards Comparison

    NIST CSF

    Voluntary
    2024

    Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide

    VS

    OSHA

    Mandatory
    1970

    US regulation for workplace safety and health standards

    Quick Verdict

    NIST CSF offers voluntary cybersecurity risk management for all organizations, while OSHA mandates workplace safety regulations for US employers with enforced inspections and fines. Companies adopt NIST for strategic cyber resilience; OSHA for legal compliance and injury prevention.

    Cybersecurity

    NIST CSF

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Introduces Govern function for strategic cybersecurity oversight
    • Six core Functions span full risk lifecycle
    • Implementation Tiers measure risk management maturity
    • Profiles enable current-target gap analysis roadmaps
    • Maps to standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53
    Occupational Safety

    OSHA

    Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • General Duty Clause addresses recognized hazards
    • Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering solutions
    • Electronic injury reporting via Injury Tracking Application
    • State plans with potentially stricter requirements
    • Enforcement through prioritized inspections and penalties

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST CSF Details

    What It Is

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It provides organizations worldwide with a flexible structure to manage cybersecurity risks, evolving from critical infrastructure focus to universal applicability. Its methodology emphasizes outcomes over prescriptive controls, using a common language for risk communication.

    Key Components

    • **Framework CoreSix Functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), 22 Categories, 112 Subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001.
    • **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial to Adaptive) for assessing risk management sophistication.
    • **ProfilesCurrent vs. Target for gap analysis. No formal certification; self-attestation via Profiles.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances risk prioritization, stakeholder communication, supply-chain management. Demonstrates due care, supports compliance (mandatory for U.S. federal agencies), builds trust. Aligns cybersecurity with enterprise risk, aiding budgets and insurance discounts.

    Implementation Overview

    Start with Current Profile assessment, prioritize gaps using Tiers. Applicable to all sizes/sectors; Quick Start Guides aid SMEs. Involves policy development, training, monitoring. No audits required, but third-party validation possible. Flexible for integration with existing programs.

    OSHA Details

    What It Is

    OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) is a US federal agency enforcing the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. It is a regulatory framework with standards in 29 CFR 1910 (general industry) and others, aimed at assuring safe, healthful working conditions. Its risk-based approach uses specific standards, General Duty Clause, and hierarchy of controls.

    Key Components

    • Subparts covering walking-working surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances (Subpart Z).
    • **Core principlesGeneral Duty Clause, PELs, recordkeeping (Forms 300/300A/301), inspections.
    • Over 1,000 standards across industries; compliance via enforcement, not certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal mandate for US employers; avoids penalties up to $165k.
    • Reduces injuries, lowers costs, improves productivity.
    • Builds reputation, meets stakeholder expectations.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phased approachgap analysis, written programs (IIPP, HazCom), training, audits.
    • Applies to most US private employers; state plans vary.
    • Ongoing compliance via inspections, no formal certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST CSF
    Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle
    OSHA
    Physical, chemical, biological workplace hazards

    Industry

    NIST CSF
    All sectors, sizes worldwide
    OSHA
    US private sector industries

    Nature

    NIST CSF
    Voluntary risk management framework
    OSHA
    Mandatory enforceable regulations

    Testing

    NIST CSF
    Self-assessment via Profiles, Tiers
    OSHA
    OSHA inspections, compliance audits

    Penalties

    NIST CSF
    No legal penalties
    OSHA
    Civil fines up to $165k per violation

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST CSF and OSHA

    NIST CSF FAQ

    OSHA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages