NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide
OSHA
US regulation for workplace safety and health standards
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF offers voluntary cybersecurity risk management for all organizations, while OSHA mandates workplace safety regulations for US employers with enforced inspections and fines. Companies adopt NIST for strategic cyber resilience; OSHA for legal compliance and injury prevention.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0
Key Features
- Introduces Govern function for strategic cybersecurity oversight
- Six core Functions span full risk lifecycle
- Implementation Tiers measure risk management maturity
- Profiles enable current-target gap analysis roadmaps
- Maps to standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
Key Features
- General Duty Clause addresses recognized hazards
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering solutions
- Electronic injury reporting via Injury Tracking Application
- State plans with potentially stricter requirements
- Enforcement through prioritized inspections and penalties
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It provides organizations worldwide with a flexible structure to manage cybersecurity risks, evolving from critical infrastructure focus to universal applicability. Its methodology emphasizes outcomes over prescriptive controls, using a common language for risk communication.
Key Components
- **Framework CoreSix Functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), 22 Categories, 112 Subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001.
- **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial to Adaptive) for assessing risk management sophistication.
- **ProfilesCurrent vs. Target for gap analysis. No formal certification; self-attestation via Profiles.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances risk prioritization, stakeholder communication, supply-chain management. Demonstrates due care, supports compliance (mandatory for U.S. federal agencies), builds trust. Aligns cybersecurity with enterprise risk, aiding budgets and insurance discounts.
Implementation Overview
Start with Current Profile assessment, prioritize gaps using Tiers. Applicable to all sizes/sectors; Quick Start Guides aid SMEs. Involves policy development, training, monitoring. No audits required, but third-party validation possible. Flexible for integration with existing programs.
OSHA Details
What It Is
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) is a US federal agency enforcing the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. It is a regulatory framework with standards in 29 CFR 1910 (general industry) and others, aimed at assuring safe, healthful working conditions. Its risk-based approach uses specific standards, General Duty Clause, and hierarchy of controls.
Key Components
- Subparts covering walking-working surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances (Subpart Z).
- **Core principlesGeneral Duty Clause, PELs, recordkeeping (Forms 300/300A/301), inspections.
- Over 1,000 standards across industries; compliance via enforcement, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for US employers; avoids penalties up to $165k.
- Reduces injuries, lowers costs, improves productivity.
- Builds reputation, meets stakeholder expectations.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachgap analysis, written programs (IIPP, HazCom), training, audits.
- Applies to most US private employers; state plans vary.
- Ongoing compliance via inspections, no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | OSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle | Physical, chemical, biological workplace hazards |
| Industry | All sectors, sizes worldwide | US private sector industries |
| Nature | Voluntary risk management framework | Mandatory enforceable regulations |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles, Tiers | OSHA inspections, compliance audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Civil fines up to $165k per violation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and OSHA
NIST CSF FAQ
OSHA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs CSA
Discover ISO 37001 vs CSA: Anti-bribery ABMS vs safety standards. Key differences, risk mitigation benefits & implementation strategies for compliance. (152 characters)
LEED vs C-TPAT
Compare LEED green building certification vs C-TPAT supply chain security: key differences, benefits & strategies for executives. Boost sustainability & compliance now!
ISO 27001 vs ISO 28000
Compare ISO 27001 vs ISO 28000: Info security mgmt (27001) for data risks vs supply chain security (28000) for logistics threats. Boost compliance & resilience—explore now!