Standards Comparison

    NIST CSF

    Voluntary
    2024

    Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide

    VS

    TISAX

    Mandatory
    2017

    Automotive standard for trusted information security assessments

    Quick Verdict

    NIST CSF offers voluntary, flexible cybersecurity risk management for all organizations worldwide, while TISAX mandates automotive-specific assessments with labels for supply chain trust. Companies adopt NIST for broad strategy, TISAX for OEM contracts.

    Cybersecurity

    NIST CSF

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Introduces Govern function as central governance hub
    • Defines six core Functions for cybersecurity lifecycle
    • Offers four Tiers for maturity and rigor assessment
    • Enables Profiles for current-target gap analysis
    • Provides mappings to ISO 27001 and NIST 800-53
    Cybersecurity

    TISAX

    Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Standardized assessments exchanged via ENX portal
    • Automotive-specific prototype protection controls
    • Three risk-based assessment levels (AL1-AL3)
    • Maturity model based on VDA ISA catalog
    • Reduces duplicate audits across supply chain

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIST CSF Details

    What It Is

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It offers organizations a flexible structure to identify, manage, and reduce cybersecurity risks across all sectors and sizes, using a common language for strategic alignment.

    Key Components

    • **Six core FunctionsGovern (new), Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover, organized into 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories.
    • **Four Implementation TiersPartial to Adaptive, assessing risk management sophistication.
    • **Framework ProfilesCurrent (existing posture) vs. Target (desired outcomes) for prioritization.
    • Built on industry standards; no formal certification, relies on self-attestation and mappings.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Elevates cybersecurity to enterprise risk strategy, fosters board-level communication, demonstrates due care (mandatory for U.S. federal agencies), enhances supply chain oversight, and supports compliance with global standards like ISO 27001. Builds stakeholder trust and competitive edge through prioritized risk reduction.

    Implementation Overview

    Start with Profile creation and Tier assessment for gap analysis; map to existing controls. Applicable globally to any organization; involves policy development, training, monitoring. Leverages free NIST resources and tools; ongoing via continuous improvement cycles. (178 words)

    TISAX Details

    What It Is

    TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry framework developed by the ENX Association and VDA for standardizing information security assessments in the automotive supply chain. Its primary purpose is to verify protection of sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information against cyber threats. It uses a risk-based approach with maturity levels across VDA ISA catalog controls, building on ISO 27001.

    Key Components

    • 70+ controls in 7 groups: policy, organization, personnel, physical security, access, cryptography, operations.
    • Three assessment levels: Basic (self), Significant (remote), Very High (on-site).
    • Modules for prototype protection and data protection.
    • 3-year labels shared via ENX portal.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandates from OEMs like BMW, Volkswagen.
    • Reduces duplicate audits, enables market access.
    • Mitigates risks, enhances resilience, builds trust.
    • ROI via efficiency gains and IP protection.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: preparation/gap analysis (1-3 months), remediation/tabletops (3-9 months), audit/certification (2-4 months). Targets automotive suppliers/OEMs globally; scalable for SMEs to enterprises via self-assessments or full audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIST CSF
    Cybersecurity risk management across all functions
    TISAX
    Automotive-specific info sec and prototype protection

    Industry

    NIST CSF
    All sectors worldwide, any organization size
    TISAX
    Automotive supply chain, primarily European OEMs/suppliers

    Nature

    NIST CSF
    Voluntary flexible framework, no certification
    TISAX
    Industry-mandated assessment with labels, 3-year validity

    Testing

    NIST CSF
    Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers
    TISAX
    AL1 self, AL2 remote, AL3 on-site audits by providers

    Penalties

    NIST CSF
    No legal penalties, loss of best practices alignment
    TISAX
    Contract loss, OEM exclusion, no direct fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIST CSF and TISAX

    NIST CSF FAQ

    TISAX FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages