OSHA
U.S. regulation assuring safe workplace conditions nationwide
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
OSHA ensures workplace safety across US industries via standards and inspections, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial entities with risk assessments and reporting. Companies adopt OSHA for hazard prevention, Part 500 for regulatory compliance.
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
Key Features
- Enforces safety via 29 CFR 1910 standards hierarchy
- General Duty Clause addresses recognized serious hazards
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering over PPE
- Mandatory injury recordkeeping with OSHA 300 logs
- Risk-prioritized inspections and civil penalties
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Annual CEO/CISO dual compliance certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
- Risk-based TPSP oversight and contracts
- Comprehensive asset inventory and management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
OSHA Details
What It Is
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), established by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, is a U.S. federal regulation enforcing workplace safety and health standards primarily in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry. Its primary purpose is assuring safe conditions by reducing hazards through standards enforcement, inspections, and cooperative programs. Key approach: hierarchy of controls (elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE) and General Duty Clause for uncodified hazards.
Key Components
- Organized into subparts covering walking-working surfaces, hazardous materials, PPE, toxic substances (Subpart Z), and recordkeeping (29 CFR 1904).
- Core principles: performance-based standards, employee rights, state plans at least as effective as federal.
- Compliance model: self-implementation with OSHA inspections, citations, penalties up to $165,514 for willful violations.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated by law for most private employers; reduces injuries, lowers costs, avoids fines. Enhances risk management, productivity, insurance rates, and reputation via IIPP programs.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, written programs (HazCom, LOTO), training, audits. Applies to most U.S. private employers; no certification but ongoing compliance via inspections.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate effective 2017 with 2023 amendments. It establishes prescriptive, risk-based cybersecurity requirements for financial services entities to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and system integrity. The approach emphasizes governance, evidence-based outcomes, and phased compliance.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO oversight, MFA, encryption, asset inventory, TPSP management, penetration testing, and 72-hour incident reporting.
- Built on risk assessments (annual or material change-driven) using frameworks like NIST CSF.
- Annual CEO/CISO certification by April 15, with five-year record retention; enhanced for Class A companies (e.g., >$20M NY revenue).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial entities (banks, insurers, etc.) to avoid multimillion-dollar fines.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust, and aligns with enterprise risk management.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance setup, risk assessment, controls (MFA, PAM), TPSP contracts, testing.
- Applies to all sizes (limited exemptions <10 employees/$5M revenue); no formal certification but DFS examinations and evidence audits required. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | OSHA | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Workplace safety, health hazards, recordkeeping | Cybersecurity for information systems, NPI |
| Industry | All general industry, construction, US-wide | NY financial services licensees only |
| Nature | Mandatory federal safety regulation | Mandatory NY state cybersecurity regulation |
| Testing | Inspections, no mandated pen testing | Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $165k per violation | Multi-million consent orders, license actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about OSHA and 23 NYCRR 500
OSHA FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs ISO 22301
Discover AEO vs ISO 22301: AEO streamlines customs & secures supply chains; ISO 22301 builds resilient BCMS. Compare benefits for trade efficiency now!
AS9120B vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
AS9120B vs MLPS 2.0: Compare aerospace distributor QMS with China's cybersecurity scheme. Master key differences for compliance, risk mgmt & global ops. Dive in!
RoHS vs ISO 26000
Compare RoHS vs ISO 26000: EU hazardous substance bans in EEE clash with global SR guidance. Master exemptions, testing & integration for compliance wins. Dive in now!