OSHA
US federal regulation for workplace safety and health standards
ISO 37001
International standard for anti-bribery management systems.
Quick Verdict
OSHA enforces mandatory US workplace safety via inspections and fines, while ISO 37001 offers voluntary global anti-bribery certification. Companies adopt OSHA for legal compliance; ISO 37001 for risk mitigation, reputation, and market access.
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 CFR 1910)
Key Features
- General Duty Clause addresses uncodified serious hazards
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering over PPE
- 29 CFR 1910 standards cover general industry hazards
- Risk-based inspections target high-hazard workplaces
- Mandatory recordkeeping with electronic injury reporting
ISO 37001
ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management Systems
Key Features
- Risk-based bribery risk assessments
- Third-party due diligence requirements
- Leadership commitment and policy
- Financial and non-financial controls
- PDCA continual improvement cycle
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
OSHA Details
What It Is
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 CFR 1910 for general industry), are U.S. federal regulations enforcing workplace safety. Primary purpose: assure safe conditions by reducing hazards via standards, enforcement, and education. Key approach: performance-based with hierarchy of controls and General Duty Clause for recognized hazards.
Key Components
- Subparts A-Z covering walking surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances.
- Over 1,000 specific requirements plus recordkeeping (29 CFR 1904).
- Core principles: employer/employee duties, inspections, penalties.
- Compliance via self-implementation, no central certification but enforced through citations.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal mandate avoids fines up to $165,514; reduces injuries/costs; enhances reputation. Mitigates risks like fatalities; supports ESG and insurance savings.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, written programs (IIPP, HazCom), training, audits. Applies to most U.S. private employers; state plans may enhance. Ongoing via inspections, no formal certification.
ISO 37001 Details
What It Is
ISO 37001 is the international certifiable standard for Anti-Bribery Management Systems (ABMS). It provides requirements and guidance to prevent, detect, and respond to bribery risks. Applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, it employs a risk-based approach following the ISO Harmonized Structure and PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Core elements: anti-bribery policy, risk assessment, due diligence, financial/non-financial controls, training, reporting, audits.
- Built on proportionality and continual improvement principles.
- Optional third-party certification with 3-year cycles and surveillance audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal risks under FCPA/UK Bribery Act; reduces liability via evidence of 'reasonable steps'.
- Enhances reputation, stakeholder trust, ESG alignment.
- Drives efficiencies (up to 15% compliance cost reduction), third-party risk control (95% cases involve them).
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control design, training, audits.
- Scalable for SMEs to multinationals; 6-12 months typical.
- Global applicability; integrates with ISO 9001/27001.
Key Differences
| Aspect | OSHA | ISO 37001 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Workplace safety, health hazards, recordkeeping | Anti-bribery management, corruption prevention |
| Industry | All US industries, general/construction/agriculture | All sectors worldwide, public/private/non-profit |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulations, enforced inspections | Voluntary certifiable international management standard |
| Testing | OSHA inspections, injury logs, compliance audits | Third-party certification audits, internal reviews |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $165k, criminal for willful violations | No penalties, loss of certification only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about OSHA and ISO 37001
OSHA FAQ
ISO 37001 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs SOC 2
Decode NIST CSF vs SOC 2: NIST's flexible Govern-led risk framework vs SOC 2's audited Security TSC. Pick the right path for robust cyber compliance today.
GDPR vs EN 1090
Compare GDPR vs EN 1090: EU data privacy law meets steel/aluminium structural standards. Master compliance, fines up to 4% turnover, execution classes & FPC for business success. Explore now!
ISO 13485 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare ISO 13485 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Essential differences in med device QMS & cyber risk governance. Boost compliance—read expert insights now!