OSHA
US federal standards for workplace safety and health
UAE PDPL
UAE federal law for personal data protection
Quick Verdict
OSHA mandates workplace safety standards across US industries via inspections and fines, while UAE PDPL enforces personal data protection for onshore entities through DPIAs, RoPAs and rights management. Companies adopt OSHA for hazard compliance, PDPL for privacy accountability.
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910)
Key Features
- Enforces General Duty Clause for recognized hazards
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizing engineering solutions
- Mandatory OSHA 300/300A/301 injury recordkeeping
- Risk-based inspections targeting high-hazard industries
- State plans matching or exceeding federal standards
UAE PDPL
Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope for UAE residents' data
- Mandatory Records of Processing Activities (RoPA)
- Risk-based DPO and DPIA requirements
- GDPR-aligned data subject rights
- Cross-border adequacy and safeguards
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
OSHA Details
What It Is
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) enforces the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, a US federal regulation codified in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry. Its primary purpose is assuring safe, healthful workplaces by reducing hazards through standards enforcement, inspections, and cooperative programs. It uses a performance-based approach with the General Duty Clause for uncodified hazards.
Key Components
- Organized into Subparts A-Z covering walking surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances.
- **Hierarchy of controlselimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE.
- Recordkeeping (Part 1904): Forms 300/300A/301, electronic ITA submission.
- **Enforcementinspections, citations, penalties up to $165,514 for willful violations.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated by law, prevents injuries/illnesses, avoids fines/disruptions. Reduces workers' comp costs, boosts productivity/reputation. Builds stakeholder trust via transparency.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, written programs (IIPP, HazCom), training, audits. Applies to most US employers; state plans vary. No certification, but ongoing compliance via inspections.
UAE PDPL Details
What It Is
UAE Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL), officially Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021, is a comprehensive federal regulation for processing personal data in onshore UAE. It adopts a risk-based framework to protect privacy, confidentiality, and align with GDPR-like international norms, applying extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting UAE residents.
Key Components
- **Core principleslawfulness, fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, security, storage limitation, accountability.
- Obligations include lawful bases (consent primary), mandatory Records of Processing Activities (RoPA), DPO/DPIA for high-risk processing, breach notification, cross-border safeguards.
- **Data subject rightsaccess, portability, rectification, erasure, objection, automated decision protections.
- Enforced by UAE Data Office; no fixed controls, ~47 articles.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal mandates, avoids penalties (multi-million AED).
- Enhances trust, cybersecurity maturity, digital economy participation.
- Risk mitigation for breaches; synergies for multinationals.
- Builds stakeholder confidence, competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: discovery/mapping, governance/policies, technical controls, monitoring.
- Targets onshore private sector; excludes free zones, govt, sectoral data.
- No certification; demonstrable compliance via RoPA, audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | OSHA | UAE PDPL |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Workplace safety, health hazards, recordkeeping | Personal data processing, privacy rights, security |
| Industry | All US industries, general/construction/agriculture | UAE onshore private sector, excludes free zones/health/banking |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulation with state plans | Mandatory federal law with sectoral/free-zone carve-outs |
| Testing | Inspections, audits, injury recordkeeping, no certification | DPIAs for high-risk, RoPA maintenance, no routine inspections |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $165k willful, daily abatement fees | Administrative fines TBD, criminal/sectoral penalties apply |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about OSHA and UAE PDPL
OSHA FAQ
UAE PDPL FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 19600 vs ISO 30301
Compare ISO 19600 vs ISO 30301: Compliance guidelines (withdrawn) vs certifiable records systems. Uncover differences, benefits & strategies for robust governance now.
COPPA vs IATF 16949
Compare COPPA vs IATF 16949: Child privacy law meets automotive QMS. Key diffs in scope, enforcement (YouTube $170M fine), consent & core tools. Master compliance now!
WCAG vs C-TPAT
Compare WCAG vs C-TPAT: Web accessibility standards meet supply chain security protocols. Master compliance differences, mitigate risks, and optimize governance. Dive in today!