PCI DSS
Industry standard for securing payment cardholder data
EN 1090
EU standard for execution of steel and aluminium structures
Quick Verdict
PCI DSS secures payment card data for merchants worldwide via audits and controls, preventing breaches. EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium fabrication through FPC certification, ensuring safety. Organizations adopt PCI for fraud protection, EN 1090 for market access.
PCI DSS
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)
Key Features
- 12 requirements organized into 6 control objectives
- 300+ granular sub-requirements for cardholder data protection
- Tiered merchant/service provider levels by transaction volume
- Mandatory quarterly ASV scans and annual penetration tests
- Contractual enforcement with fines and processing bans
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- CE marking under CPR for market access
- Welding quality via ISO 3834 integration
- Material traceability and NDT inspection
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PCI DSS Details
What It Is
PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a contractual industry standard managed by the PCI Security Standards Council. It mandates technical and operational requirements to protect cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) for entities storing, processing, or transmitting payment card information. Structured around 12 requirements in 6 control objectives, it uses a control-based approach with over 300 sub-requirements.
Key Components
- **Core structureNetwork security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring/testing, and policies.
- **PCI DSS v4.0Introduces customized approaches, MFA emphasis, and third-party risk.
- **Compliance modelTiered levels (1-4 for merchants, 2 for service providers); validated via SAQ, ROC, ASV scans, and QSA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual obligation for card handlers, avoiding fines, bans, and breach costs ($37/record avg.).
- Reduces fraud, builds customer trust, enables market access.
- Enhances risk management and operational maturity.
Implementation Overview
- **Assess-Repair-Report cycleScope CDE, gap analysis, remediate, validate.
- Applies globally to all sizes handling cards; 6-12 months typical, high complexity/cost.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is the harmonized European standard family for the execution of steel and aluminium structural components and kits. It serves as a regulatory framework under the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR), enabling CE marking through conformity assessment. The primary purpose is to ensure controlled fabrication, assembly, and performance declaration for load-bearing components in construction works. It employs a risk-based approach via Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4), scaling requirements by consequence, service, and production categories.
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC) certification, Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (materials, welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, inspection/NDT).
- Core principles: Traceability, welding quality (ISO 3834), risk-proportional controls.
- Compliance model: Notified Body certification of FPC with ongoing surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces liability, ensures safety. Benefits include defect reduction, market credibility, and capability for high-risk projects. Builds stakeholder trust via auditable processes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: Gap analysis, FPC development, personnel training, NB certification. Applies to fabricators in construction; 3–12 months typical. Requires audits, welding qualifications.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PCI DSS | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Payment card data security controls | Structural steel/aluminium fabrication execution |
| Industry | Payment processing, merchants globally | Construction, fabrication in EU/EEA |
| Nature | Contractual standard, voluntary certification | Harmonized standard, mandatory CE marking |
| Testing | Quarterly scans, annual audits by QSA/ASV | FPC certification, NB surveillance audits |
| Penalties | Fines, loss of processing privileges | Market exclusion, legal enforcement under CPR |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PCI DSS and EN 1090
PCI DSS FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
POPIA vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare POPIA vs Australian Privacy Act: Scope, 8 conditions, juristic persons, enforcement & gaps. GDPR-aligned insights for seamless compliance. Master global privacy now!
PCI DSS vs NIST 800-53
PCI DSS vs NIST 800-53: Compare payment security standards vs federal privacy controls. Key differences, overlaps & implementation guide for compliance success. Secure smarter now!
NIS2 vs CE Marking
NIS2 vs CE Marking: Compare cybersecurity risk mgmt & reporting vs product conformity. Avoid fines up to 2% turnover, ensure EU compliance. Dive in now!