What is the primary objective of **PCI DSS**?

**The primary objective of PCI DSS is to protect cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) to reduce payment card fraud.** PCI DSS, managed by the PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) since 2006, establishes 12 requirements across six control objectives for entities storing, processing, or transmitting CHD, such as the Primary Account Number (PAN). It mandates rendering PAN unreadable (e.g., via tokenization or strong cryptography) and prohibits SAD storage post-authorization, including full track data, CVV/CVC, and PINs.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **PCI DSS**?

**All entities that store, process, or transmit cardholder data (CHD) or sensitive authentication data (SAD), or impact their security, must comply with PCI DSS.** This includes merchants (Levels 1-4 based on transaction volume, e.g., Level 1 over 6 million transactions annually per brand) and service providers (two levels). The Cardholder Data Environment (CDE) encompasses connected systems like networks and authentication servers. Compliance is contractual, enforced by card brands (Visa, Mastercard, etc.) via acquirers.

Does **PCI DSS** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**PCI DSS requires external validation for higher-risk entities, including QSA-conducted Reports on Compliance (ROC) and ASV quarterly scans.** Level 1 merchants/service providers (high transaction volumes) mandate annual on-site QSA ROCs plus four passing ASV external vulnerability scans (CVSS ≥4.0 vulnerabilities fail). Levels 2-4 use Self-Assessment Questionnaires (SAQs) with some ASV scans; no universal certification exists, but Attestations of Compliance (AOCs) accompany reports.

How often should an assessment for **PCI DSS** be performed?

**PCI DSS assessments occur annually, with ongoing quarterly and periodic testing to ensure continuous compliance.** Annual SAQ/ROC validation is required, supported by quarterly internal/external vulnerability scans (ASV for external), annual penetration testing (plus post-changes), semi-annual firewall rule reviews, daily log reviews, and weekly file integrity monitoring. Scoping must be reviewed annually and after significant changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **PCI DSS**?

**Non-compliance with PCI DSS results in contractual penalties including fines up to $100,000 monthly, fraud liability, and loss of card-processing privileges.** Card brands enforce via acquirers, imposing increased fees, forensic costs, and suspension (e.g., Heartland's 14-month ban). Breaches amplify damages: average $37 per record, plus GDPR fines up to €20M/4% global turnover if CHD involves personal data; 47.5% of interim-compliant entities fail maintenance.

An **PCI DSS** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**PCI DSS v4.0 can be mapped to frameworks like NIST CSF and ISO 27001 via shared controls in risk management, access, and monitoring.** Its 12 requirements align with NIST CSF functions (e.g., Protect/Detect via encryption/logging) and ISO 27001 Annex A domains, enabling integrated programs. PCI SSC provides guidance, but mappings require evidence of equivalent outcomes, especially for customized approaches.

What is the first step to begin implementing **PCI DSS**?

**The first step to implement PCI DSS is to define and document the Cardholder Data Environment (CDE) scope via data flow diagrams and asset inventory.** Identify all CHD/SAD locations, flows, and connected systems; assume everything in scope until segmentation is validated. This enables gap analysis, SAQ/ROC selection, and scope reduction via tokenization or network segmentation.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it follows a high-level Annex SL structure with ten clauses covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. Core principles include good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability, enabling risk-based integration with existing management systems for all organization sizes and sectors.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a non-mandatory Type B guidance standard.** It applies voluntarily to all types and sizes of organizations facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal policy obligations, including financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, technology, public sector, and SMEs. Stakeholders such as Chief Compliance Officers, boards, and risk committees use it to benchmark CMS alignment for regulators, customers, and partners.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a non-certifiable guidance document.** Organizations conduct internal audits per ISO 19011, self-assessments, and management reviews (Clause 9) to evaluate CMS effectiveness. It supports benchmarking and demonstration of compliance but lacks mandatory "shall" requirements; certification is available under its successor, ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should occur at planned intervals via monitoring, internal audits, and management reviews, with reassessments triggered by changes or issues.** Clause 9.1 requires continual monitoring of performance, obligations, risks, and culture using Key Compliance Indicators (KCIs). Quarterly management reviews (Clause 9.3), annual audits, and horizon scanning for regulatory changes ensure the CMS remains suitable, adequate, and effective under the PDCA cycle.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal mandates.** However, lacking a structured CMS increases exposure to regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, higher insurance costs, and governance failures from unaddressed compliance obligations and risks, as illustrated by cases like fines for inadequate anti-bribery controls.

An **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 can be mapped to other international frameworks due to its Annex SL structure and PDCA alignment.** Its risk-based CMS integrates with existing systems like quality or environmental management, facilitating consolidated processes, shared documentation, and unified audits while preserving compliance independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is securing top-management commitment and establishing a Compliance Steering Committee (Phase 0).** Per Clause 5, obtain board endorsement via a signed charter, define CMS scope considering context and obligations (Clause 4), and appoint cross-functional oversight to ensure leadership, resources, and governance principles like independence and direct board access.

PCI DSS vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

PCI DSS

Mandatory

2022

Global standard for securing payment cardholder data

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

Guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

PCI DSS mandates technical controls for cardholder data security in payments, enforced contractually with fines and bans. ISO 19600 provides voluntary CMS guidelines for all compliance risks. Payments firms adopt PCI DSS for operations; others use ISO 19600 for governance.

Payment Security

PCI DSS

Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

12 requirements across 6 control objectives protect cardholder data
Over 300 granular sub-requirements with testing procedures
Leveled validation via SAQ for small, ROC for large entities
Contractual enforcement by brands with fines and bans
Evolves with v4.0 emphasizing MFA, segmentation, third-party risks

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based compliance management framework
PDCA cycle with Annex SL structure
Principles of good governance and proportionality
Scalable for all organization sizes
Integration with existing management systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

PCI DSS Details

What It Is

PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a contractual security framework for entities handling cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD). Managed by the PCI Security Standards Council, it mandates protection during storage, processing, and transmission via a control-based approach with 12 requirements under 6 objectives.

Key Components

12 core requirements covering network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, and policies.
Over 300 sub-requirements with testing procedures.
Leveled compliance: SAQ for smaller entities, ROC by QSAs for larger.
Evolves via versions like v4.0 (2022, mandatory 2024) adding MFA, segmentation.

Why Organizations Use It

Merchants and service providers adopt it contractually to avoid fines, processing bans, and breach costs ($37/record avg.). Benefits include fraud reduction, customer trust, regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR), and operational maturity.

Implementation Overview

Involves scoping CDE, gap analysis, remediation, validation (ASV scans, pentests). Applies globally to card handlers; costs $5K-$200K+. Phased: assess-repair-report cycle, ongoing via quarterly scans.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The risk-based approach applies universally across organization sizes, sectors, and geographies, using a PDCA cycle aligned with Annex SL structure.

Key Components

10 clauses covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Focus on compliance obligations, risk assessment, controls, training, monitoring, and continual improvement.
Non-certifiable benchmarking tool, predecessor to ISO 37301.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates legal penalties, operational disruptions, reputational damage.
Enhances decision-making, efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access.
Builds integrity culture, future-proofs for certification.
Demonstrates governance to regulators, stakeholders.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, deployment, improvement.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals; integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
No formal certification; internal audits, self-assessments.

Key Differences

Aspect	PCI DSS	ISO 19600
Scope	Payment card data security (CHD/SAD protection)	General compliance management systems (CMS)
Industry	Payment processing, merchants, service providers globally	All industries/organizations worldwide
Nature	Contractual standard, enforced by card brands	Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable
Testing	Quarterly ASV scans, annual pen tests, QSA ROC/SAQ	Internal audits, management reviews, no certification
Penalties	Fines, processing bans, GDPR fines	No direct penalties (governance improvement)

Scope

PCI DSS

Payment card data security (CHD/SAD protection)

ISO 19600

General compliance management systems (CMS)

Industry

PCI DSS

Payment processing, merchants, service providers globally

ISO 19600

All industries/organizations worldwide

Nature

PCI DSS

Contractual standard, enforced by card brands

ISO 19600

Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable

Testing

PCI DSS

Quarterly ASV scans, annual pen tests, QSA ROC/SAQ

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews, no certification

Penalties

PCI DSS

Fines, processing bans, GDPR fines

ISO 19600

No direct penalties (governance improvement)

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about PCI DSS and ISO 19600

PCI DSS FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025

Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance

Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 26000 vs SAMA CSF

Discover ISO 26000 vs SAMA CSF: Social responsibility guidance meets cyber framework. Compare principles, maturity models & implementation for resilient compliance. Dive in!

CMMC vs NERC CIP

Compare CMMC vs NERC CIP: DoD cybersecurity tiers for DIB contractors vs grid reliability standards for BES. Uncover key differences, compliance paths, and strategies to boost security now.

SAFe vs Basel III

SAFe vs Basel III: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe's Lean-Agile principles & configs vs Basel III's capital/liquidity rules. Unlock compliant agility—compare now!

PCI DSS

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

PCI DSS

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

PCI DSS Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

PCI DSS FAQ

What is the primary objective of PCI DSS?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with PCI DSS?

Does PCI DSS require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for PCI DSS be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with PCI DSS?

An PCI DSS be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing PCI DSS?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

An ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 26000 vs SAMA CSF

CMMC vs NERC CIP

SAFe vs Basel III