GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    PCI DSS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    PCI DSS

    Mandatory
    2022

    Industry standard protecting payment cardholder data security

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection regime

    Quick Verdict

    PCI DSS secures cardholder data globally via contractual controls, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded protection for all China networks under police oversight. Companies adopt PCI for payments, MLPS for legal China operations.

    Payment Security

    PCI DSS

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 12 requirements across 6 control objectives protecting cardholder data
    • Tiered levels 1-4 for merchants based on transaction volume
    • Quarterly ASV vulnerability scans and QSA-conducted ROC audits
    • Mandatory network segmentation scoping Cardholder Data Environment
    • v4.0 mandates MFA, strong cryptography, third-party risk management
    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-tier grading by societal impact of compromise
    • Mandatory for all China network operators
    • Technical/management controls per protection level
    • Expert review and PSB registration for Level 2+
    • Ongoing inspections and continuous re-evaluations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PCI DSS Details

    What It Is

    The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is a globally mandated industry standard for entities handling credit, debit, or prepaid card data from major brands like Visa and Mastercard. Managed by the PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) since 2006, it protects cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) through a control-based approach with 12 requirements organized into 6 control objectives.

    Key Components

    • 12 core requirements spanning secure networks, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, network monitoring, and personnel policies.
    • Over 300 sub-requirements and controls, updated in v4.0 (fully mandatory since 2025).
    • Tiered compliance: 4 merchant levels, 2 service provider levels; validated via Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ), Report on Compliance (ROC) by Qualified Security Assessors (QSAs), and quarterly Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV) scans.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual obligation enforced by payment brands, avoiding fines, processing bans, and breach costs (~$165 per record).
    • Reduces fraud, ensures GDPR alignment, builds customer trust.
    • Provides competitive edge through demonstrated security maturity.

    Implementation Overview

    • Define Cardholder Data Environment (CDE), conduct gap analysis, implement segmentation and controls.
    • Applies to all merchants/service providers globally handling CHD.
    • Involves annual/quarterly validations, ongoing maintenance amid evolving threats.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) is China's mandatory regulatory regime for classifying and securing networks and information systems. Formalized via Ministry of Public Security regulations and GB/T standards like GB/T 22239-2019, it implements Article 21 of the Cybersecurity Law (CSL). Its core approach grades systems into five levels based on potential societal impact from compromise.

    Key Components

    • Domains: physical/environmental, network, host/application, data security, operations/monitoring, governance/personnel.
    • Baseline controls plus level-specific extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS.
    • Compliance model: self-classification, expert review/registration (Level 2+), PSB enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for China network operators; fines, shutdowns for non-compliance.
    • Reduces breach risks, ensures resilience, enables government/SOE contracts.
    • Aligns with DSL/PIPL; builds trust, market access.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased program: mobilization, assessment/classification, remediation, verification/filing, operationalization. Targets all China-based orgs; requires Chinese documentation, audits for higher levels. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectPCI DSSMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeCardholder data protectionAll networks and systems graded by impact
    IndustryPayment processing globallyAll sectors in mainland China
    NatureContractual standard, fines via banksMandatory law, police enforcement
    TestingQuarterly scans, annual ROC/SAQLevel-based expert reviews, periodic re-evals
    PenaltiesFines, processing bansFines, suspensions, criminal exposure

    Scope

    PCI DSS
    Cardholder data protection
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All networks and systems graded by impact

    Industry

    PCI DSS
    Payment processing globally
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All sectors in mainland China

    Nature

    PCI DSS
    Contractual standard, fines via banks
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory law, police enforcement

    Testing

    PCI DSS
    Quarterly scans, annual ROC/SAQ
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Level-based expert reviews, periodic re-evals

    Penalties

    PCI DSS
    Fines, processing bans
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, suspensions, criminal exposure

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PCI DSS and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    PCI DSS FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

    Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

    Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

    How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

    How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

    Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

    SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

    SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

    Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how PCI DSS and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other PCI DSS Comparisons

    • PCI DSS vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    • PCI DSS vs ISO 27018
    • PCI DSS vs MAS TRM
    • PCI DSS vs NIST CSF
    • NIS2 vs PCI DSS

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • TISAX vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • DORA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018
    • NIS2 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved